Republican's are sooo gay!

[trish]

...as evidenced this week by Sen. Larry Craig.

[Quinn]

The whole thing actually reminded me of our now dear departed White_Male_Canada.

-Quinn

[qeuqheeg222]

GOP-gay old pederasts......

[TJT]

You think a Senator would be above understall action. I'm only voting for gloryhole guys from now on.

[Rogers]

Now you know why the Republicans hated Clinton so much: he likes women!

The GOP's Bathroom Problem
The moment is so thick with irony, I scarcely know where to begin. But let's start with their incredibly lame attempts at damage control. Upon arrest, both Allen and Craig attempted to use their positions of power to escape charges (Craig handed over his US Senate business card to the officer and asked, "What do you think about that?).

Post-arrest, Allen, appealing at once to homophobia and racism, mounted a "black (gay) panic" defense. You see he wasn't really interested in giving head, he was just trying to save his neck. Apparently, the cop was "a pretty stocky black guy" and "there were nothing but other black guys around in the park." Fearing he was "about to become a statistic," Allen did what any other, rational, straight (straight!), white man would do if he just so happened to find himself cruising a public restroom full of black men: fork over a Jackson and drop to your knees.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion?pid=227318

Such a parcel o' rogues in a nation - Robert Burns.

[trish]

If Craig was up on his Jerry Seinfeld he could've used the "i was asking for a spare square" excuse.

what irks me most about this fiasco is that after his run-in with the law he makes the public statement, "I am not gay," as if that's what he was cited for. He's was charged with lewd and indecent behavior, not for being gay. Craig would like to give the impression that hanging around in bathrooms cruising for cocks to suck is the definition of a gay relationship.

_________________
I ain't got no squares to spare.

[Trans Mission]

It's all posturing. Gay/straight, who even knows anymore. Lines are blurred.

I lean right, but you throw me in a room with Jennifer Paris and I'm gonna melt and submit. I don't condemn ANY sexuality, though.

His Rebublicanism is being held against him like George Soros should have his lack of energy conservation held against him. If we're to be fair and honest.

These political predujices are no more founded than sexual ones. People like to attack opposing indoctrinations, when the truth is usually in the middle.

Let's get back to the objects of our obsession?

[trish]

Craig’s rhetoric against gays was vituperative and his obstructionism of gay rights was formidable and relentless. It’s not his republicanism I hold against him, it’s his blind hypocrisy. Note too, it’s not the democrats who called for his resignation, it was his own party.

[Rogers]

... it’s his blind hypocrisy.

Fuckin' A! (Pardon my French.)

[Trans Mission]

Craig’s rhetoric against gays was vituperative and his obstructionism of gay rights was formidable and relentless. It’s not his republicanism I hold against him, it’s his blind hypocrisy. Note too, it’s not the democrats who called for his resignation, it was his own party.

It's my own fault for engaging in this conversation. I wasn't trying to invalidate your opinion, just shed light on blind ideology being the basis of SOME peoples uninformed opinions. Not necessarily yours.

Vituperative, c'mon, that's being pretentious and you know it.

Also, of course, it has to be his own political affiliates that best his unintentional political genocide. Otherwise, they absorb the brunt of his foolish actions.

While I absolutely agree he is a raving hypocrite, I am just saying both sides are guilty of hypocrisy and any rational thinker realizes this.

With all this said, I like your sexuality in regards to writing, which I complimented you on in Vikki Richters stinging bunghole thread. So keep coming at us with your witty prose.

Have I mentioned my school boy crush on Jennifer Paris, yet?