Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Platinum Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The United States of kiss-my-ass
    Posts
    8,004

    Default Woman must pay 222K in RIAA lawsuit

    RIAA Jury Finds Minnesota Woman Liable for Piracy, Awards $222,000

    DULUTH, Minnesota -- Jammie Thomas, a single mother of two, was found liable Thursday for copyright infringement in the nation's first file-sharing case to go before a jury.

    Twelve jurors here said the Minnesota woman must pay $9,250 for each of 24 shared songs that were the subject of the lawsuit, amounting to $222,000 in penalties.

    They could have dinged her for up to $3.6 million in damages, or awarded as little as $18,000. She was found liable for infringing songs from bands such as Journey, Green Day, Aerosmith and others.

    After the verdict was read, Thomas and her attorney left the courthouse without comment. The jurors also declined to talk to reporters.

    The verdict, coming after two days of testimony and about five hours of deliberations, was a mixed victory for the RIAA, which has brought more than 20,000 lawsuits in the last four years as part of its zero-tolerance policy against pirating. The outcome is likely to embolden the RIAA, which began targeting individuals in lawsuits after concluding the legal system could not keep pace with the ever growing number of file-sharing sites and services.

    "This is what can happen if you don't settle," RIAA attorney Richard Gabriel told reporters outside the courthouse. "I think we have sent a message we are willing to go to trial."


    rest of article-
    http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...ury-finds.html


    "I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity." - Poe

  2. #2
    Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NYC area
    Posts
    1,121

    Default

    I <3 free, unsigned music.

    Fucking people and their money.



  3. #3
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    256

    Default

    And I bet they were shitty songs too...*sigh*


    It's not denial. I'm just very selective about the reality I accept.

  4. #4
    Gold Poster SarahG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Everywhere & Nowhere
    Posts
    4,502

    Default

    What do you expect? She had no case.

    The laws are clear about the consequences if someone uses your insecure wireless network for illegal activity.

    If you refuse to read the owners manual and have an open network, people can do whatever the hell they want with it and you're the one that'll end up in jail when the cops find your IP has been hosting a kittie porn site...

    Ignorance is no excuse.


    And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
    With all of its misery and wretched lies
    If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
    The Big Machine will just move on
    Still we cling afraid we'll fall
    Clinging like the memory which haunts us all

  5. #5
    Gold Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Moya
    Posts
    4,902

    Default

    Ridiculous,corporation greed at its best instead of going after single mothers why don't they spend that time and effort going after sites like piratebay who really puts a dent in their precious sales.



  6. #6
    Professional Poster timxxx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,535

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by manbearpig
    And I bet they were shitty songs too...*sigh*
    She downloaded
    Guns N Roses, Vanessa Williams, Janet Jackson, Gloria Estefan, Sara McLachlan, Aerosmith, Def Leppard, Green Day, Bryan Adams, No Doubt, Sheryl Crow, Richard Marx and Destiny's Child.



  7. #7
    Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    The key is do not "upload". Downloading is not the crime, as RIAA would have a heck of a case proving she did not own those CD's in the past at some time or another (which provides her ownership to the copyright to download).

    She should have used an anonymous IP ie TOR or something if she was going to distribute..



  8. #8
    Gold Poster SarahG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Everywhere & Nowhere
    Posts
    4,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ottorocket
    The key is do not "upload". Downloading is not the crime, as RIAA would have a heck of a case proving she did not own those CD's in the past at some time or another (which provides her ownership to the copyright to download).

    She should have used an anonymous IP ie TOR or something if she was going to distribute..
    It is also illegal, debatibly, in some states & countries, to "link to pirated content"

    And if you settle with the RIAA et al, they expect you to sign a legal document stipulating that you agree making something available for download is the same as actually uploading the content to someone else.


    And maybe its easier to withdraw from life
    With all of its misery and wretched lies
    If we're dead when tomorrow's gone
    The Big Machine will just move on
    Still we cling afraid we'll fall
    Clinging like the memory which haunts us all

  9. #9
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    339

    Default

    Just another example of corporate America stiffing the little guy. Not like the artists or labels would go bankrupt on a few people downloading their music. I stopped buying CDs years ago.



  10. #10
    Professional Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Potomac, Maryland
    Posts
    1,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phxguy
    I stopped buying CDs years ago.
    You're not alone buddy. Torrents are my friend.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •