Impeachment!

[White_Male_Canada]

point is there was NO UNDERLYING CRIME. Libby was set up in a perjury trap.

Clinton conspired to suborn perjury and lied in court. he did it in a deliberate premeditated manner , there was no trap set for him.

if you can`t see the legal distinctions you`re as far gone as queen.

Let us see. Clinton lied, Libby lied. Neither lied in court, both in sworn testimony. Clinton's lie was about having sex (in a sexual harassment lawsuit, that was dismissed), Libby's was about what he knew of the outing of a CIA operator (in grand jury testimony about the leak, in which he was the only one charged). Both were caught. Clinton lost his law llicense, Libby was sentenced to jail and a fine.

Libby, like Clinton, was not going to tell the 'whole' truth. He was, like Clinton, going to evade the absolute truth, and give just enough information to satisfy the prosecutor. Both were caught in their lies.

That you see Clinton's as a worse offense exposes your bias. They are both felons.

As Fitzgerald's sentencing memo said: Libby had options, including telling the truth, declining to speak with FBI agents or taking the Fifth Amendment before the Grand Jury or challenging the lines of inquiry he believed to be improper.

"Regrettably, Mr Libby chose the one option the law prohibited: He lied. "

Clinton gave sworn testimony by deposition before a Judge. To be specific, Judge Wright in the Jones v. Clinton case. When he did so he committed perjury repeatedly. Added to that fact is subornation of perjury , filing a false affidavit, witness tampering, obstruction,etc.

Libby fell into a perjury trap because Fitzgerald knew no law was broken. If a law was broken R.Armitage would be on trial.

[Rod la Rod]

There has to be some basis for having an adult conversation. W M Canada does not meet the minimum required standard.

Clearly a remedial semi-literate retard.

[Oli]

Clinton gave sworn testimony by deposition before a Judge. To be specific, Judge Wright in the Jones v. Clinton case. When he did so he committed perjury repeatedly. Added to that fact is subornation of perjury , filing a false affidavit, witness tampering, obstruction,etc.

Libby fell into a perjury trap because Fitzgerald knew no law was broken. If a law was broken R.Armitage would be on trial.

What law was broken to bring Clinton into that courtroom?

None, it was a civil lawsuit.

What law was broken to bring Libby into the Grand Jury room?

None, Fitzgerald lacked the evidence.

Both lied under oath. Neither in the commission of a crime. Both were caught.

You're excusing Libby's behavior.

An aside, the commutation was probably the right thing, and Libby showed his character by paying the fine today.

[Oli]

A few other nuggets:

Marc Rich's lawyer was I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby. "Early in March 2001, at a "contentious" Congressional hearing to review Clinton's pardons, Libby testified that he thought the prosecutions's case against Rich "misconstrued the facts and the law". -Wiki

The Washington D.C. Bar has suspended Libby's law license, pending the outcome of his appeal.

Libby is the first sitting White House official to be indicted in 130 years.

[ToyBoy6669]

Dense !? LOL Good one. Libby was found guilty and is a felon. He did pay, 250 Gs and 2 years probation. The sentence was commuted, not pardoned.

You`ve become another mental defective like quinn aka queen aka villageidiot.

Do all you left wing kooks drink from the same well? Better have the water tested.

what kind of punishment is 250G's to a lawer who probly makes close to a million a year? They commuted the jail time because he would have sung like a bird in prision