High price for hot air( GlobalWarmingNOT!) CourierMail

[specialk]

because WMC has even less integrity than he has intellect.

Hi Trish.....isn't this the guy everyone is bantering with? :P

[trish]

…just because a particular paper has passed through peer review does not absolutely insure that the conclusions are correct or scientifically valid.

This is true. But it’s also true that if an author can’t get his paper published in a any peer reviewed journals, then the paper just doesn’t pass muster.

Most of those are former students of his. So you`ve got these little saplings thinking their actually bigger and have deluded themselves into some sort of consensus, thinking they are casting their swadow over the massive oak tree who spawned them.

In other words, you’re saying that his mentoring is as pathetic as his research.

Here’s an idea, WMC. Why don’t you spend some time addressing the points people put to you? Fill up one hole before digging another? At least wipe your ass after you take a shit.

[Rogers]

First, peer review, just because a particular paper has passed through peer review does not absolutely insure that the conclusions are correct or scientifically valid.

Sound familiar ?

Hurrah! You've finally conceded that there is not one scientific paper that casts doubt on global warming and it's human causes. Ergo, skeptics have only got opinion. As Jeff Poole of Wynnum said, "if it ain't in a scientific journal baby, it ain't science!" Oh, but it's all a conspiracy isn't it? And it's ensure, not insure, but that will be your dyslexia again.

Secondly:

And I see you've completely ignored my point about what appears to be the man-made cooling of Antarctica lowering the global mean temperature. Weak, pathetic

So, how is cooling actually warming ?

Surely you're not that dumb, _Canada? Cooling of the Antarctic (which appears to have been caused by the hole in the ozone layer) has lowered the global mean temperature. The World is made up of a Northern Hemisphere (which is rapidly warming) AND a Southern Hemisphere (which contains the bulk of the World's Oceans, i.e. a big buffer of temperature, the World's least industrialized countries, AND a friggin' big island continent that has become colder thanks to man) don't you know. You essentially answered your question yourself:

This study was promptly seized upon as proof that the world is not warming, but a single example of localised cooling proves no such thing, as the lead author of the 2002 study has tried to point out.

Anyway, a few years data doesn't make a trend in climate. Lies, damn lies, and statistics, what.

It really is absolutely pointless debating with you, _Canada. I am of the opinion that you are only here to annoy others and spam this board with your bilious wingnut opinions. How sad is that? Real debate is about the exchange of informed opinions between fellow human beings who respect each other. I really don't know how trish and LG can stand your idiocy and obnoxiousness.

Hey, _Canada, peer review this,

[Rogers]

Why? Most of those are former students of his. So you`ve got these little saplings thinking their actually bigger and have deluded themselves into some sort of consensus, thinking they are casting their swadow over the massive oak tree who spawned them.

So you're into hero worship as well, _Canada? That has as much place in science as politics does, i.e. no place.

[White_Male_Canada]

And I see you've completely ignored my point about what appears to be the man-made cooling of Antarctica lowering the global mean temperature. Weak, pathetic

This study was promptly seized upon as proof that the world is not warming, but a single example of localised cooling proves no such thing, as the lead author of the 2002 study has tried to point out.

Anyway, a few years data doesn't make a trend in climate. Lies, damn lies, and statistics, what.

All data is not peer reviewed in journals and the facts are that the data have proven mean temp. cooling.

The piece de resistance is "anyway data doesn`t matter...".

I have qouted from your own link and it`s made you so dizzy and confused you don`t even know if you`re arguing global cooling or warming.
You argue global mean cooling and get contradicted by your own link to your own story.
When confronted with data proving global mean temps have fallen since `98 you state a "few years of data doesn`t a trend make...Lies, damn lies...", thereby clearly implying not global cooling but warming !

Phone algore, get your story straight, then go talk to other retards and leave rational thought to the adults.It`s offcial you moronic idiot, you`ve just won the asshole merit badge.

Congratulations, now get lost punk, you should be ashamed of yourself.

[Rogers]

Data is not peer reviewed and the facts are that the data have proven mean temp. cooling.

ROTFLMAO. Still no papers to back up your position, so you have conceded!!! Haha. Nah, still don't see evidence of global cooling:
Global temperature:
http://www.newscientist.com/data/ima...6/24861402.jpg
Another angle:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:I...ure_Record.png
Satellite data:
http://www.globalwarmingart.com/imag...mperatures.png

The piece de resistance is "anyway data doesn`t matter...".

Never said that, never would. Cheating again, dyslexic _Canada.

I have qouted from your own link and it`s made you so dizzy and confused you don`t even know if you`re arguing global cooling or warming.
You argue global mean cooling and get contradicted by your own link to your own story.
When confronted with data proving global mean temps have fallen since `98 you state a "few years of data doesn`t a trend make...Lies, damn lies...", thereby clearly implying not global cooling but warming !

Nah, the only one here that's "dizzy and confused" is you. What don't you understand, _Canada? Not all areas of the Earth will warm, and some will cool. Antarctica is cooling because of the strengthening of the circular winds that move around it, thus reducing the global mean temperature. It does not mean that the Earth is entering a cooling period.

Congratulations, now get lost punk, you should be ashamed of yourself.

Coming from you, I'll take that as a compliment. I seem to have gotten under your skin very quickly, _Canada. That's the kind of reaction I like from a liar and a fraud. And all you can do is try and make it look like I said things I didn't. Very poor, very poor indeed!

[White_Male_Canada]

Once more, you`ve contradicted yourself and apparently are either so fucking stupid you don`t even know it or are just feinging ignorance in a worthless attempt to save any last vestige of dignity.

And I see you've completely ignored my point about what appears to be the man-made cooling of Antarctica lowering the global mean temperature. Weak, pathetic

This study was promptly seized upon as proof that the world is not warming, but a single example of localised cooling proves no such thing, as the lead author of the 2002 study has tried to point out.

Global mean temperatures have dropped since 1998:

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/te...adcrut3vgl.txt

Anyway, a few years data doesn't make a trend in climate. Lies, damn lies, and statistics, what.

The piece de resistance is "anyway data doesn`t matter...".

I have quoted from your own link and it`s made you so dizzy and confused you don`t even know if you`re arguing global cooling or warming.
You argue global mean cooling and get contradicted by your own link to your own story.
When confronted with data proving global mean temps have fallen since `98 you state a "few years of data doesn`t a trend make...Lies, damn lies...", thereby clearly implying not global cooling but warming !

Phone algore, get your story straight, then go talk to other retards and leave rational thought to the adults.

[trish]

oh, we're into repeating ourselves again, eh. ok

[trish]

oh, we're into repeating ourselves again, eh. ok

[muhmuh]

I really don't know how trish and LG can stand your idiocy and obnoxiousness.

Hey, _Canada, peer review this,

allright guys time to pay up!
who had his money on todays date?