Results 41 to 50 of 98
-
02-16-2005 #41
Danielle adds an insightful introspect to the thread. A play by play if you will. You should keep starting interesting topics that inspire others to comment on. Why don't you start a great threat on the Extravaganza girls.
Danielle also has a very tight asspussy. If I catch her and Allanah kissing again I am going to have to go back to men.
-
02-16-2005 #42
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 440
there is no safety in doing BB sex pure and simple. ANY BB sex is an open window to the virus.
nobody should need any articles or stats. unprotected sex is russian roulette. but for a couple bucks i guess its justified. right?
totally insane. you wash your hands after going to the bathroom but would have sex with a virtual stranger unprotected? putting your life on the line. screwy.
shit everyone on this board is probably connected sexually. scary shit.
-
02-16-2005 #43
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 57
Originally Posted by Danielle Foxxx
A recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine suggested that everyone should get a yearly AIDs exam. I strongly disagree with this. And it's too bad that they we have this feeling of politically correctness in this country that we can't just say; "Look, if you're engaging in xyz, you NEED to get tested for AIDs OFTEN." Here's a few things that come to my mind:
If you're engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners, you need to get an AIDs test.
If you're doing drugs and sharing needles, you need to get an AIDs test.
If you're working with blood products, you need to get an AIDs test.
If you've had more than five sex partners, regardless of whether or not you are gay or straight, you need to get an AIDs test. And when I say sex partners, I mean people you have had sex with, including oral, vaginal, and anal, protected or unprotected, it never hurts.
But let's stop with this "everyone" thing. Not everyone needs to get tested. If you can't say to certain groups of people they should be tested, a) you have no balls, and b) you're skirting the issue.
Something else, I also feel that if you know you're HIV positive and you're going around having unprotected sex with people, you should be charged with first degree murder. Here's why: HIV leads to AIDs which is a deadly disease that kills people every single year. If you know you have HIV and you're having unprotected sex with people and not telling them you have HIV, you are willfully and deliberately spreading a deadly disease, and there's no telling how many people could get it from a person you infected. And if you live in a state that has the death penalty, I would have no problems seeing it invoked.
As far as this super AIDs virus or however it's being dubbed goes, I don't take too much stock in it. Drug addicts have weaker immune systems (to my knowledge the first person this was found in was a major meth user), HIV weakens the immune system even more, so just imagine what it would do to someone whose immune system has been turned into liquid shit by drugs. Either it's a huge scare by the liberally biased media who enjoys jumping the gun and reporting stories by the media, or it really is a super AIDs virus...until I get my hands on some concrete medical studies, I put little stock in what the media tells me...unless it's Fox News, since they do report both sides of the issues.
"You wanna hug it out?" "No...not really." "Let's hug it out, bitch, let's hug it out." -- Entourage
-
02-16-2005 #44
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 440
i think the concept is that everyone should get tested as a safegaurd because you can't put any numbers or parameters on the virus. a virus doesn't discriminate or give you a few free passes.
if you sleep with x amount of partners you aren't at risk? huh?
aren't people statistically unfaithful? do you know who is being faithful?
no we don't. hence everyone maybe should get tested. i can't imagine why someone would resist.
why do people resist? fear of...? its a shame there are people out there dedicating themselves to the stop of the spread of the virus and others who almost seem to be going out of their way to spread it.
now where is my crystal?
-
02-16-2005 #45Originally Posted by hillbilly
Is this reminding anyone of the South Park episode?
-
02-16-2005 #46
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 440
did you read my whole post?
monogamy? what's that? so in theory we are dealing with 2 monogamous virgins? where are they i'd love to meet them hahah.
is that the idea?
-
02-16-2005 #47
-
02-16-2005 #48
-
02-16-2005 #49
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 601
I rest my case, we obviously have differences of opinions here and I totally respect everyone's opinion and I thank you for your concern. I do not think I am putting anyone at risk, and if one day I test positive ( knock on wood - Vicki's wood to be exact ) I will not work anylonger. Number one - they test in Porn - I don't do 5 movies every week, I do 1 movie a month - if that - This includes web site modeling and video. Girls who are working all the time are GGs who are at higher risk then me - if I may ask. I see sleeping with tranny chasers a higher risk then sleeping with porn stars who are tested, I don't know if some of you are too old to get that through your thick head, but it looks like it. So, as I can put it, I order flavored condoms online and extra thick/large condoms as well, I have them with me all the time, in case I run into one of you. I practice safe sex basically most of the time - Most because I do bareback scenes, but I would let Vicki cum inside with right now w/out a test because I know she is the most safest person out there - You all should see that there are some girls that care about more then a few bucks, I am sure you are used to dealing with cheap whores all the time, girls you have to call and bargain prices with, trust me, you tried to call me several times - cheap asses - but the truth is - if a girl looks like she needs to shower with a bottle of hand sanitizer, or doesn't land scape, or has bumps on her crotch, or has red balls, if she looks too skinny etc...DON"T TOUCH IT! I mean this is a stereotype and I am sorry for doing it - but since you are all treating me and Vicki like dirty sluts because we do care to get regular tests then you can kiss both of our HIV negative Asses!
By the way - here are a few pictures of STD infested pubic areas...
-
02-16-2005 #50
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 601
more