Results 21 to 30 of 98
-
02-15-2005 #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 601
Originally Posted by Bigwilly
I don't have to change my work just because a handfull of people disagree with my decision, a word of advice - don't buy or watch my movies, as a matter of fact....my name is not a bone to be in a dog's mouth - get smart dude.
And by the way....I haven't had an avitar for a few months because my old one was stored in my old web site which was erased, so now it it stored in my other account....Those are my new pictures....And I wouldn't make any decision based on any of your comments any where - I can care less for uneducated fools - Eat Shit!
-
02-15-2005 #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 601
By the way - what do you guys think of my new Animation, I am so proud I made it myself.....
-
02-15-2005 #23
Love it.
Originally Posted by Danielle Foxxx
-
02-15-2005 #24
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 145
Originally Posted by AllanahStarrNYC
-
02-15-2005 #25
Re: Love it.
Originally Posted by joyboy123
-
02-15-2005 #26
LOL Sid did you just drop a hit of acid?
Or have u become dellusional
b/c
in NO WAY have I EVER said I was a scientist lol
or a doctor, or an expert.
The tone os my posts are that I have questions and SO do alot of other people.
I am not preaching anything- I am stating another point a view.
To call someones point of view dangerous who is offering diversity in a topic and optional opinions, such as the man who whon the nobel prize for chemistry in 71- is indeed dangerous because you are trying to censor other view points and not taking any of the experts or research I have posted seriously.
I am nort advocating any kind of "risky" sexual behaviour as myself will only do scenes with condoms and always preactice safe sex. In fact, I am not advocating anything.
Arent you British? Do u live in the UK? Maybe U should watch that BBC program I mentioned.
AIDS does exist and I have never said it does not. However, HIV is the probable cause of AIDS- SCIENTIFFIC FACT. PROBABLE-ASK YOU MATES THE GENETICIST. There is no scientiffic data that proves that if you contract HIV you will develop AIDS- the hypothesis says "most likely".
Go educate yourself before you start spewing out nonsense, especially about my post and what I claim myself to be...
BY the way- if you are interested in what I do claim to be-
a thinking human being.
-
02-15-2005 #27
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 145
Australian, not British (AU?). Look, I agree with you that all viewpoints must be looked at, but until something better comes along prudence suggests that the majority view be given due creedence. Although there is no outright link between HIV and full-blown AIDS, there is a lot of empirical evidence (I agree, not outright proof) to suggest a connection. That alone needs to respected.
Through no choice of your own, there are some here who are sycophantic in their approach to your posts. Your lack of acknowledgement of the opposing view to your own is potentially dangerous in that some here - and elsewhere - may well infer that there is little or no point in following the advice of the general scientific community. That is why what you espouse is dangerous - at least to an extent.
-
02-15-2005 #28
Heu SID
here are EXACT quotes from your Mates-
Geneticist and Scientist- not people on the fringes of genetic and HIV research
I do my HOMEWORK on both ends- and I suggest you do before you come attack me
I realized that the whole group of viruses to which HIV is said to belong, retroviruses ...in fact do not exist at all. I was wondering what viruses are for... in evolutionary biology and found that ...every one of our genomes, and that of higher plants and animals, is the product of so-called reverse transcription: RNA transcribed into DNA.."
Dr. Stefan Lanka Ph.D.
Interview in Zengers Magazine
Virologist
" People have totally misunderstood the nature of genetic systems in higher organisms. This will probably turn out to be the greatest failure in the history of molecular biology."
Prof. Dr. John S. Mattick
Quoted in NY Times 21 Jan 2003
Director: Aus. Genome Research Facility; Institute for Molecular Bioscience Univ. Queensland; ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics.
"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."
Dr. Kary Mullis
1993 Nobel Prize Winner for Chemistry
Dr. Harry Rubin, Professor of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley: "It is not proven that AIDS is caused by HIV infection, nor is it proven that it plays no role whatever in the syndrome."
Dr. Richard Strohman, Emeritus Professor of Cell Biology at the University of California at Berkeley:
"In the old days it was required that a scientist address the possibilities of proving his hypothesis wrong as well as right. Now there's none of that in standard HIV-AIDS program with all its billions of dollars."
Dr. Harvey Bialy, Molecular Biologist, former editor of Bio/Technology and Nature: "HIV is an ordinary retrovirus. There is nothing about this virus that is unique. Everything that is discovered about HIV has an analogue in other retroviruses that don't cause AIDS. HIV only contains a very small piece of genetic information. There's no way it can do all these elaborate things they say it does."
"AIDS is a behavioural disease. It is multifactorial, brought on by several simultaneous strains on the immune system - (Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, University of Glasgow) drugs, pharmaceutical and recreational, sexually transmitted diseases, multiple viral infections."
Dr. Joseph Sonnabend: "The marketing of HIV, through press releases and statements, as a killer virus causing AIDS without the need for any other factors, has so distorted research and treatment that it may have caused thousands of people to suffer and die."
Physician, founder of the American Foundation for AIDS Research (AmFAR)
-
02-15-2005 #29
SID if I advocated
"Go out and fuck everything with out a condom" then YES that would be dangerous...
I am not advocating anything-
Dont be afraid to hear other view points...
You have the same reaction to these post like the media does and the AIDS establishment-
b/c you say this stuff it means we should not be worried about STDS
that is not what this is about-
this is about a different view point from the view points we all know that is preached to us all the time-
i dont want to contract HIV and of course I am worried about it-
but i am no convinced with conventional medicine 100 %
btw
i believe there is an Australian scientist
in my list of quotes...cool
-
02-15-2005 #30
My quick summary and "the end" comment clearly didn't work. Ha ha.
Allanah you know what I am talking about though. I certainly oversimplified it, but that is the point of summarization. Obviously my post failed to serve at the most simplistic of levels... sarcastic witty humor. What I really think is you should create a generic response to the HIV topic inquiries and Danielle and I should write one explaining safety in doing BB scenes in porn. We write the same thing ever time... which is really what I was asserting in my last post.
ps - As usual, thanks for your insight kitten kat (purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr)
pss - Danielle, I love your animation. Good stuff
psss - I got Saturday's test back from AIM... Still neg. Woohoo!!! Glad I didn't catch something from those "dirty" porn girls. :P
freak on y'all,
~V~