Results 91 to 98 of 98
-
02-18-2005 #91
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 667
I believe all males are gay to a certain degree. There are a lot of straight males that love watching porn that has huge dicks banging chicks.
-
02-18-2005 #92Originally Posted by domweb
The point is, the testing is quick and easy and it IS adopted by the porn community as a whole. I don't know what you are talking about here. All porn performers are tested at least every 30 days.
Vicki
-
02-18-2005 #93
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Midwest USA
- Posts
- 10
Originally Posted by Vicki Richter
I quote,
"CHATSWORTH, Calif. - After Darren James was found to be HIV-positive in March after a trip to Brazil, the Adult industry as a whole realized there was a hole in the testing system that acts as their only defense against HIV: while Porn Valley subjects performers to PCR-DNA tests at least once every 30 days, performers across the globe don’t enjoy the same safety protections."
Click here for Entire Article
While it is true that the recent HIV problems have caused 'Porn Valley' in California to institute thirty day HIC testing, not all Porn is made there. (Just most of it).
Originally Posted by Danielle Foxxx
Great discussion by the way. I appreciate the info on the new tests.
-
02-18-2005 #94
Not 3 days. They are talking about the international community. American porn is fairly well regulated for the most part.
-
02-19-2005 #95
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 211
Am I missing something here? There are places in NYC where you can get your test results in 20 minutes for $95 - which would seem to have a window narrow enough to safeguard against infection after the testing. I'm not sure if the other tests are more accurate, but why wouldn't this test be the one used?
I also get pissed that it's not something readily available for people to use at home. I know that if a positive result comes up, the person would need counseling desperately and that's a large reason why instant home testing isn't around, but wouldn't the fallout be less deadly if you could buy something to use at home? I am also aware that it might make people use condoms less, but I still think the benefits would outweigh the danger. It might not be the most romantic thing to do before you hook up with a new partner, but to me, saving a life is a pretty romantic notion.
Also, I haven't read anywhere on these boards about the 'incubation period' between the moment you are infected and when it actually appears in your tests. I have asked doctors and heard anything from 1 week to 6 weeks. That means if you had sex and got infected on any given night, you might not yield a positive result for 3 weeks. THAT'S where the real danger is. I'm not terribly educated on the details, but isn't this an issue?
-
02-19-2005 #96
The test you can get results in 20 minutes is the shitty one not the PCRDNA.
-
02-19-2005 #97
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 7
Tests
Vicki
The test you can get results in 20 minutes is the shitty one not the PCRDNA.
How do you know which is which test ? What is the one you girls do and how do you go about getting one of those ?
I thought the shitty one was pretty cheap and wasn't effective until up to a few months after actual infection ? I don't see the point in getting the result after 20 mins if it is that crappy ...
Cheers
-
02-19-2005 #98
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 211
Originally Posted by Vicki Richter
The PCRDNA tests specifically for the HIV virus; the ELISA tests for antibodies. The antibodies can take up to 13 weeks to develop, but the virus presence would be detected in cells right away (the results are available usually within 48-72 hours), and if a PCRDNA comes back negative it's usually confirmed with an ELISA 13 weeks later.