Escorts - BJ with or without Protection ?

[whatsupwithat]

I don't buy into much the Bush (or any other) administration, the CDC, forum members or media try to sell me. I look at things and draw my on conclusions. I have plenty of views on this entire topic that I'm sure would piss you and probably everyone else here off--- so I'll keep them to myself. But the fact is that sex if not done for procreation is done for recreation, that goes for heterosexuals too. Unlike you, I can accept that. Sex does not express love, you're being silly. And as a recreational activity, not much different than doing drugs (the release of endorphins), it always involves some risk. You're getting mad at people who chose to take a personal risk, when you're doing the EXACT SAME THING, you just feel better because you think your risk is lower.You're going to die, and personally I think you're gonna die the way it's planned for you to die. Some people get infected with HIV and never develope AIDS, just like some people smoke 10 packs of cigs a day and live to be 90. Why? Man doesn't know because he doesn't know everything and is not in control of everything.
I'm saying if you want to start a crusade, start one against rec. sex otherwise you're just advocating playing the odds.And you didn't answer my question: WOULD YOU BE MAD AT SOMEONE WHO CONTRACTED HIV WHILE WEARING A CONDOM? (I'll answer it for you-- NO!). It's kinda simple logic, sorta like " doctor it hurts when I do this"..."well don't do that!". If you truly don't want to catch a sexually transmitted disease, don't have sex.

The risk is 87% lower with a condom.


And, no, I would never be mad at anyone who contracted HIV, no matter how they contracted it. However, I would be mad at someone who had HIV and knowingly had unprotected sex with people...or people that don't have HIV and don't take some simple steps to stop its spread to them and others.

[whatsupwithat]

I don't buy into much the Bush (or any other) administration, the CDC, forum members or media try to sell me. I look at things and draw my on conclusions. I have plenty of views on this entire topic that I'm sure would piss you and probably everyone else here off--- so I'll keep them to myself. But the fact is that sex if not done for procreation is done for recreation, that goes for heterosexuals too. Unlike you, I can accept that. Sex does not express love, you're being silly. And as a recreational activity, not much different than doing drugs (the release of endorphins), it always involves some risk. You're getting mad at people who chose to take a personal risk, when you're doing the EXACT SAME THING, you just feel better because you think your risk is lower.You're going to die, and personally I think you're gonna die the way it's planned for you to die. Some people get infected with HIV and never develope AIDS, just like some people smoke 10 packs of cigs a day and live to be 90. Why? Man doesn't know because he doesn't know everything and is not in control of everything.

btw, no disrespect, but it seems obvious to me where your philosophy is coming from. am i correct?

[sucka4chix]

btw, no disrespect, but it seems obvious to me where your philosophy is coming from. am i correct?

No disrespect taken I'm actually quite impressed and surprised that your demeanor has remained very civil. I can't say where my philosophy comes from--- I don't fit squarely in any group, but I'm sure you're correct about my foundation. On that foundation I've built a "philosophy" basically just observing how things seem to occur on this planet.
Your feelings are commendable but some people take more risks than others; it's just the way they live their lives.After a while you have to accept the decisions people make as their own, even if they're lethal.

[Danterichard]

From the UK. I'm NOT an escort but have been with dozens over the years. ALMOST all expectr to be sucked without a condom and the majority are happy to give a blow-job without - though some ask to be warned before you cum and very few i have encountered swallow. It is my understanding from talking to both girls and doctors that there are NO recoded cases of HIV infection from oral sex. Anecdotal evidence though.
As for penetrative sex - as others have said you'd have to be mad or already infected. I've never been offered it - either way - and after sex in chatting no girl has ever been anything but totally hositile to the whole concept.

[whatislove]

People make "decisions" based on there experience and habit more than anything. Occasionally you can influence that and actually learn from other experiences. (A uniquely human quality) Most places have seatbelt laws now, and the total cost of healthcare for car accidents, insurance, crushed families went down.

Before that I can tell you the people who most wore seatbelts were those who intimately affected by a car accident.

"Just the way they live their lives." People expect something from society. Should society have no expectations?

btw, no disrespect, but it seems obvious to me where your philosophy is coming from. am i correct?

No disrespect taken I'm actually quite impressed and surprised that your demeanor has remained very civil. I can't say where my philosophy comes from--- I don't fit squarely in any group, but I'm sure you're correct about my foundation. On that foundation I've built a "philosophy" basically just observing how things seem to occur on this planet.
Your feelings are commendable but some people take more risks than others; it's just the way they live their lives.After a while you have to accept the decisions people make as their own, even if they're lethal.

[CockStroker]

The new rules, proposed by the Centers for Disease Control, are based on legislation from an Oklahoma congressman who believes abstinence should be the center of HIV prevention campaigns, according to The Boston Globe.

The pervert thing about such an opinion is, that a political party is using the fear of death and illness and making an action (in this case sex), that they don't agree to, more dangerous to people to increase the fear, to force people into a specific behaviour, that they as a party want.

It's like intentually building a very unstable and unsafe bridge over a rift to prevent people crossing to the other side, because you don't want them to. And if they try and die, because the bridge collapsed, saying: "Your fault. You knew the bridge was unstable." while in fact the guilt is on the one who built the bridge intentually unstable, because it was in his very interest and he wanted people to die if they try to cross.

It is also very "unamerican" (in the quoted case), since America is about freedom for the people - and making sex more dangerous to prevent them having it is actually intentually taking away freedom from US citizens.

[LG]

Following on from tlew85's post....

I am interested.....

Do you give clients oral with or without protection ?

Also... Is it not irrelevant wether or not you swallow as I thought any STD would be present on the skin of the penis anyway ?

I realise that many who vote may not want to add to the thread but a vote would be most appreciated... please escorts only...

x

Sorry to interject here Jen, but I just had to... In the future, you might want to repeat that and make it stand out a bit more, as PLEASE ESCORTS ONLY!!! PLEASE ESCORTS ONLY!!! would go farther towards getting the response of the escorts you wanted to comment here, and reducing those of non-escorts, if you will. Again, sorry to be commenting here myself, what with not being a tgirl escort, but I trust you can appreciate my reason.

Yes, it's interesting that there are already 34 responses. I didn't even think we had 34 escorts posting on these boards.
So guys, let's make this clear. You are not supposed to vote on this one.

[InHouston]

I received BJ from an escort one time, and didn't use a condom. Two days later I was at the doctor's office getting a prescription for clap.

It's not worth the risk.

[62des]

What's clap?

[mpcc2004]

I don't buy into much the Bush (or any other) administration, the CDC, forum members or media try to sell me. I look at things and draw my on conclusions. I have plenty of views on this entire topic that I'm sure would piss you and probably everyone else here off--- so I'll keep them to myself. But the fact is that sex if not done for procreation is done for recreation, that goes for heterosexuals too. Unlike you, I can accept that. Sex does not express love, you're being silly. And as a recreational activity, not much different than doing drugs (the release of endorphins), it always involves some risk. You're getting mad at people who chose to take a personal risk, when you're doing the EXACT SAME THING, you just feel better because you think your risk is lower.You're going to die, and personally I think you're gonna die the way it's planned for you to die. Some people get infected with HIV and never develope AIDS, just like some people smoke 10 packs of cigs a day and live to be 90. Why? Man doesn't know because he doesn't know everything and is not in control of everything.
I'm saying if you want to start a crusade, start one against rec. sex otherwise you're just advocating playing the odds.And you didn't answer my question: WOULD YOU BE MAD AT SOMEONE WHO CONTRACTED HIV WHILE WEARING A CONDOM? (I'll answer it for you-- NO!). It's kinda simple logic, sorta like " doctor it hurts when I do this"..."well don't do that!". If you truly don't want to catch a sexually transmitted disease, don't have sex.

So by your philosophy I guess I shouldn't wear any protective gear on my motorcycle because it won't completely prevent my death if I have an accident just lower the chances of me dying. Or seatbelts aren't needed either. Or maybe babies shouldn't be put in child seats because it won't absolutely prevent their death in an accident, just lower the chances.

Or maybe noone should be concerned with what they are eating and drinking because a good diet won't prevent an early death, just lower the chances of it happening.

You are entitled to think what ever you wish in this country. But I have to tell you that attitudes like yours lead to millions of prentable deaths throughout the world each year. Additionally, this attitude leads to much higher health care costs which in turn affects the global economy which in turn affects you. Everything is global and circular. What you do eventually affects everybody else and then affects you again.