View Poll Results: Overall quality of the models on this site.
- Voters
- 115. You may not vote on this poll
Results 51 to 57 of 57
Thread: TGirlPassion.com
-
11-28-2007 #51
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 53
im not doing anything there you see?
-
11-28-2007 #52
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Posts
- 689
All I know is that some of those girls on that site are ok, but the majority of them arent my style. But like I said, cant knock the hustle. [Someone literally needs to do a search and see how many times I post that] Anyway, I just hate how the webmaster did me after I redesigned the entire site for him. He took a draft for the front page and ran with it.
There are a lot of CDs because DR is just kinda like that. Its hard for the girls to get hormones and shit like that, so thats the problem. THen its hard to transition over there becaues of the people.
But you gotta remember that the webmaster himself crossdresses, and you see him in a lot of the pics. If I had the funds, Id do what he does. Id move to a latin american country, open a small site, and live on the beach all day. Because there are tons of people who like that type of shit. Who woulda thunk a YUM would blow up to what it is now [Ive been checking out shemale yum since like '98/'99] While they had quality girls, they were one of a handful of sites that actually had TSs, but it grew. I was happy there was something out there for me. Im sure people who like those type of girls is happy there is a site that caters to them. I mean, there are tons of TS sites, how many CD/TV SEX sites are there?
-
11-29-2007 #53Originally Posted by LBCDO
The fact is there are a million and one gay sites catering for the desire of men to sexually fantasise over other men; some people like me come to this site because we are interested in transsexual WOMEN.
-
11-29-2007 #54
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Berlin
- Posts
- 221
Originally Posted by rvince
Oh and IMO, it is pretty gross and the name IS misleading.
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
-
11-29-2007 #55Originally Posted by dgtlmstry
-
11-29-2007 #56Originally Posted by dgtlmstry
Originally Posted by dgtlmstry
Victoria Holyns' Webmaster.
-
11-29-2007 #57Originally Posted by rvince
However a spade is still a spade.
IMO there's no question, as I've already said, that the title of the site is misleading. You can argue the toss all you like, but this is a site full of gay men, for the vicarious pleasure of other gay men.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with girls of any description. Therefore that word should not be in its title.
QED.