View Poll Results: Overall quality of the models on this site.

Voters
115. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hot

    36 31.30%
  • Not Bad

    22 19.13%
  • Not Good

    32 27.83%
  • Gross

    25 21.74%
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 57 of 57
  1. #51
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    53

    Default

    im not doing anything there you see?



  2. #52
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    689

    Default

    All I know is that some of those girls on that site are ok, but the majority of them arent my style. But like I said, cant knock the hustle. [Someone literally needs to do a search and see how many times I post that] Anyway, I just hate how the webmaster did me after I redesigned the entire site for him. He took a draft for the front page and ran with it.

    There are a lot of CDs because DR is just kinda like that. Its hard for the girls to get hormones and shit like that, so thats the problem. THen its hard to transition over there becaues of the people.

    But you gotta remember that the webmaster himself crossdresses, and you see him in a lot of the pics. If I had the funds, Id do what he does. Id move to a latin american country, open a small site, and live on the beach all day. Because there are tons of people who like that type of shit. Who woulda thunk a YUM would blow up to what it is now [Ive been checking out shemale yum since like '98/'99] While they had quality girls, they were one of a handful of sites that actually had TSs, but it grew. I was happy there was something out there for me. Im sure people who like those type of girls is happy there is a site that caters to them. I mean, there are tons of TS sites, how many CD/TV SEX sites are there?



  3. #53
    Platinum Poster MacShreach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LBCDO
    If I had the funds, Id do what he does. Id move to a latin american country, open a small site, and live on the beach all day. Because there are tons of people who like that type of shit. Who woulda thunk a YUM would blow up to what it is now [Ive been checking out shemale yum since like '98/'99] While they had quality girls, they were one of a handful of sites that actually had TSs, but it grew. I was happy there was something out there for me. Im sure people who like those type of girls is happy there is a site that caters to them. I mean, there are tons of TS sites, how many CD/TV SEX sites are there?
    I've no issues with the business model. I do have issues with the slobbering queens who post pictures of other men here and then twitter on about how lovely they are.

    The fact is there are a million and one gay sites catering for the desire of men to sexually fantasise over other men; some people like me come to this site because we are interested in transsexual WOMEN.



  4. #54
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rvince
    It's a TV site and it's IMHO totally unfair to compare it to other shemale sites!

    ...

    Disclaimer: I know the webmaster of this site and he's a great guy although I really think I'd have the same opinion even if I didn't know him.
    Thanks for the disclaimer. Your objectivity just went right out the window.

    Oh and IMO, it is pretty gross and the name IS misleading.


    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."

  5. #55
    Platinum Poster MacShreach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dgtlmstry
    Quote Originally Posted by rvince
    It's a TV site and it's IMHO totally unfair to compare it to other shemale sites!

    ...

    Disclaimer: I know the webmaster of this site and he's a great guy although I really think I'd have the same opinion even if I didn't know him.
    Thanks for the disclaimer. Your objectivity just went right out the window.

    Oh and IMO, it is pretty gross and the name IS misleading.
    Yup, one pornographer sticking up for another....bit like lawyers....



  6. #56
    Veteran Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    French Riviera :-)
    Posts
    545

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dgtlmstry
    Oh and IMO, it is pretty gross and the name IS misleading.
    Do you base your judgment on a site on the sample pictures it provides or on what's written in the title bar?

    Quote Originally Posted by dgtlmstry
    Yup, one pornographer sticking up for another....bit like lawyers....
    Be thankful there are pornographers or you'd have no wanking material


    Victoria Holyns' Webmaster.

  7. #57
    Platinum Poster MacShreach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    5,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rvince
    Be thankful there are pornographers or you'd have no wanking material
    True, and if there were no lawyers my business would be vulnerable.

    However a spade is still a spade.

    IMO there's no question, as I've already said, that the title of the site is misleading. You can argue the toss all you like, but this is a site full of gay men, for the vicarious pleasure of other gay men.

    It has nothing whatsoever to do with girls of any description. Therefore that word should not be in its title.

    QED.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •