Results 31 to 40 of 47
Thread: Post-Op Pics
-
06-25-2007 #31
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 141
Originally Posted by Silvester
-
06-25-2007 #32
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 141
[quote="peggygee"]
Originally Posted by johnnyshemaleloverOriginally Posted by peggygee
Me: I'm not saying all post-op vaginas look bad, I just want to know why almost all the photos I see of post-ops are bad ones.
You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good.
Me: I'm not saying they don't, I'm just asking why almost all the photos I see of post-ops are bad ones.
You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good.
Me: Ok, fine. I don't know what typical post-ops look like, and I'm assuming you're right (that they look good) because you obviously know a hell of a lot more about this than I do, since I've never even seen one. All I want to know is why all the photos I see are of bad ones.
You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good. If you still think they don't, then prove it.
Look, I don't doubt what you're telling me. I have no experience here and you have a lot. You clearly have very high intelligence as well, and I mean that sincerely.
Being an intelligent, educated and rational person doesn't mean you never have feelings, of course. The problem with feelings is that when they're strong, they can interfere with perception which of course leads to communication difficulties.
Everyone has at least one thing they're so passionate about they forget reason. I have lots of them myself. I am guessing you're hurt, frustrated, sick and fed up with attacks from guys who get offended by GRS and react by insulting the result; and that's the sore spot which I am inadvertently pressing on here.
You're still lumping me in with all the people who are pissed at post-ops for getting their penises lopped off so they try to say all post-op vaginas look horrible. I've explained it to you several times that this isn't what I'm saying, but I can't get through the storm of emotion that surrounds you on this issue. You simply refuse to hear me. If that's the way you need to handle the issue, ok then.
I no longer expect an answer and I've lost interest in getting one.
I hope I haven't offended you.
-
06-25-2007 #33
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Out there somewhere...
- Posts
- 2,810
If I can end this long, tedious misunderstanding once and for all, here is a link from Lynn Conway's site, complete with many pictures of post of vaginas performed by the now retired Eugene Schrang who performed over 900 SRS procedures (and yes, the vaginas in the photos do look pretty good).
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/SRS.html
See also Dr Suporn's site:
http://www.supornclinic.com/
http://www.chet-plasticsurgery.com/Srs_result.html
For a listing of surgeons (for the girls):
http://www.tsroadmap.com/physical/vaginoplasty/
To compare photos of vaginoplasties performed by different surgeons:
http://www.annelawrence.com/srsindex.html
And for some rather upsetting photos and videos of the procedure (not for the squeamish):
http://srs-resources.info/srs%20imag...%20videos.html
I believe the debate is now over. Thank you.
Navin R. Johnson: You mean I'm going to stay this color??
Mother: I'd love you if you were the color of a baboon's ass.
-
06-25-2007 #34
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
- Posts
- 3,968
[quote="johnnyshemalelover"]
Originally Posted by peggygee
You are right to a large extent that the constant attack on post ops has
me somewhat defensive.
From your initial posts, I thought that you were yet another one on the
attack.
What hurt even more so, was that I didn't initially perceive you as a
threat. You struck me as a decent, amicable, likable fellow.
And that's even with a name like 'johnny shemalelover', which if you've
read any of my numerous posts on the topic is also a sore spot.
And because you struck me as a decent guy, I let my guard down a bit.
It was while letting my guard down that you began your line of
questioning, and I felt like I had been suckerd by the rope-a-dope.
Admittedly, I didn't think you were sincere about your concern for post
ops, because I am ass-u-med that you were like many of he men
here who are cock-centric and who become very testy when their object
of affection has been taken away from them.
To answer your question, you can go to any of the sites of the many
surgeons who perform SRS, and view their work.
And there are post op websites and forums, some run by women, most
of a non porn nature.
Before I close, I do want to address the lingering question why don't more
post op women show off their vaginas.
There are of course many post op women who remain in the
transcommunity, or the industry for a variety of reasons.
But after yearning and struggling all of your life to be the women that you
knew you were, and now you are legally, aesthetically, and for thw most
part functionally that woman.
Well then...you are on the first train or plane out of trannyville.
And most don't come back.
-
06-25-2007 #35
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
- Posts
- 3,968
Thanks LG for your post, you must have made it just as I was typing
my response.
Those are good links, and should allow those that would like to
peruse the pussy to do so.
There are a few surgeons that are missing, and of course the forums
and websites that I alluded to aren't there.
It has been posited that there are 30,000 - 40,000 post op transwomen in
America, seems like you would have a better chance seeing Bigfoot
than a post op. http://www.hungangels.com/board/view...=12755&start=0
Maybe that's cause us gyno-Americans, don't particularly want to be found.
-
06-25-2007 #36
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 1,216
Originally Posted by LG
is that observation of mine correct?
Elvis: I was dreamin'. Dreamin' my dick was out and I was checkin' to see if that infected bump on the head of it had filled with pus again. If it had, I was gonna name it after my ex-wife 'cilla and bust it by jackin' off.
-
06-25-2007 #37
Another flaw that annoys me about srs results is that some surgeons make the labia minora dive directly into the opening of the vaginal canal rather than partially circle the outer rim of it, which I've only seen maybe once on a natal vagina.
And the labia minora are too small or missing completely.
If I get srs, I want something substantial enough to pierce down there.
That, and I just like big flappy labia. lol
-
06-26-2007 #38
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- L.A.
- Posts
- 463
more post ops
-
06-26-2007 #39
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- L.A.
- Posts
- 463
and more
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
06-26-2007 #40
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
- Posts
- 3,968
Originally Posted by muhmuhOriginally Posted by youcancallmeclaire
reasons and functionality.
As you might imagine the clitoris is extremely sensitive, and the
constant contact on it could be uncomfortable - to some.
And I would agree with both of you some surgeons don't get the labia
minora quite right. Though most of the surgeons who do the two stage
procedure, tend to get it spot on.
I'm pleased with my vlotoral hood, labia minora and majora.
And in he words of Adele Givens, "all my lips are big".