WHO'S THE PARTY OF LINCOLN?

[trish]

I really don't have to answer to anyone on a message board.

of course not dearie. you just come along inside and ignore those bolshevik brutes.

[chefmike]

..

[chefmike]

Nice try, TFool...but you repug chickenhawks have about as much in common with Lincoln as you do with Jefferson...

Nice try, TFool...but you repug chickenhawks have about as much in common with Lincoln as you do with Jefferson...

Well your chickenhawk theory has been shot to shit. LMAO!

[specialk]

>>>>>>>>>>

[chefmike]

[olite71]

Now, tell me where I “distorted the mans words.” He put the blame for Iraq dragging on with the dissenters against the Bush Administration’s policies (otherwise known as the overwhelming majority of the United States). I refuted it by blaming the Bush Administration's poor planning/impelementation and then providing supporting statements as to just how serious the effect of Bush’s failed policies has been – even going so far as to divide the Republican Party (if you wish to dispute that, I can provide plenty of articles to support what is obvious to everyone).

Still using that word "respond"? Ok, I'll give you that word. But your response was an attempt to mischaracterize what guyone said as "Bush Administrations poor planning" He said nothing as such.

Like I said from the outset. "That's a poor diversion of the intent of guyone's statement."

Let's take yet another look at guyone's post and then your response-

Guyone said-
You're abosolutly right and if everyone stopped whining about this and that (blood for oil and the rest of the communist propaganda) and just get the job done it wouldr be acomplished by now.

You responded-
Yeah, that's the problem. It's not a matter of poor planning or implementation on the part of the Bush Administration. It's people complaining.

Yeah, that's the problem? See here, you start off in agreement then manipulate from there. Then, you strawman guyone's post "It's not a matter of poor planning......"

You're weaving a complex web of misrepresentation and manipulation.

Man---you need to give it up TFAN. YOu have absolutely NO credible argument here. If you actually believe in what you're writing (as opposed to just being a pain in the ass devil's advocate who won't admit he's wrong) then, I'm impressed because I believe what I'm seeing here is delusion on a DEFCON 1 level, and you don't see DEFCON 1 delusion that often.

[Quinn]

Inciteful analysis, olite71.

-Quinn