My opinions on escorting: an intellectual debate

[muhmuh]

how about an argument against escorting that cant be argued with: the law of large numbers

[blakpadi]

Ignorant thugwannabe that the streets will humble in time.

[GroobySteven]

I think that you are misinterpreting his use of "God" in his statement. To leave judgement to God, means that we are not making personal judgements against people or discriminate against them in any way. We accept that person and let their life have it natural consequences.

Then why bring God into it?
If he's talking about "judgement" - he's then he's automatically starting his debate with stating that he thinks what they do is wrong but he's not going to judge.
It's bollocks.
seanchai

[JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel]

I can't believe this thread is still up.

[MrsKellyPierce]

I think that you are misinterpreting his use of "God" in his statement. To leave judgement to God, means that we are not making personal judgements against people or discriminate against them in any way. We accept that person and let their life have it natural consequences.

Then why bring God into it?
If he's talking about "judgement" - he's then he's automatically starting his debate with stating that he thinks what they do is wrong but he's not going to judge.
It's bollocks.
seanchai

Agreed..he was using "GOD" in a snorty torty way. Saying oh let God Be the judge. Thats automatically stating what they think with out being the ones to say it, because they are too pussy to have their own opinion. And hide behind "God" for judgement, hate, and feel better than. That's the point I was trying to get across..Noone is better than anyone else. We all stem from different jobs, but at the same time may not lead the best life. I know plenty of lawyers and doctors that are doing drugs, beating their wives, cheating on their wives, and yet that isn't taken into consideration? I also know escorts that are the sweetest most angelic people you could meet. Don't do drugs, Don't even drink much less smoke. But they do get paid for their time. Whenever someone brings "God" into an argument. It's to judge someone, or to say I'm better than you. So YODA read between the lines before you type.

[MrsKellyPierce]

FIRST - Can you really throw "God" into the argument of who is better than for their choice of who they sleep with, and then admit to premarital sex and masturbation, both of which are sins? "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone". Sit the fuck down.

Second - Once again, "God" isn't a valid argument in this situation. You have to realize that we don't live in a theocracy and people have freedom of Choice. If you want to enact your religion and praise how you see fit, then that's awesome. But being presumptuous enough to tell someone that THEY are not doing what "God" intended is fucking ignorant. When was the last time He spoke to you and told you what His DIVINE plan was? And second - forgiveness and ACCEPTANCE are two of the most important tenets of Christianity. Leave the judgement up to someone with a hell of a lot more experience than you. Again, sit the fuck down.

Third - You may not agree with the choice, but either way - it's called a civil liberty. She/He is not imposing on your civil rights, so she/he has the constitutional right to do whatever she/he wants. Stop being uneducated pricks.

THAT IS ALL

I think that you are misinterpreting his use of "God" in his statement. To leave judgement to God, means that we are not making personal judgements against people or discriminate against them in any way. We accept that person and let their life have it natural consequences. That is the real acceptance, not the Christian Wrong movement approach.

I think he was saying that he was not judging escorts, but pointing out mostly negative consequences. The topic has been much discussed on this forum. All life paths have some negative sides, but this is the wrong place to bring it up. This is forum where people are proudly discussing their escort exeriences. An exception would be as was stated earlier, by someone who is doing it and wants to discuss thier life.

Clearly he was judging escorts..read the first paragraph..obviously you are blind or can't comprehand what he was saying?

[JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel]

lol @ snorty torty

I demand that the OP spend a week in a closet area of a one bedroom apartment in an urban environment with no identification only a pre-paid cellphone and a nearby pc hotspot where you can rent net time by the hour; i demand that the OP then post an ad on craigslist so that he can then spend hours on end in that closet area in that 1 bedroom apartment in an urban area answering phonecalls from pretenders saying they'd like to make an appointment or detectives trying to set him up; finally I demand that the OP after making some money off of a client then give 80% of it to the primary renter to pay for that closet space............ when you've accomplished that, feel free to post a fair observation of what many of these girls go through

[MrsKellyPierce]

lol @ snorty torty

I demand that the OP spend a week in a closet area of a one bedroom apartment in an urban environment with no identification only a pre-paid cellphone and a nearby pc hotspot where you can rent net time by the hour; i demand that the OP then post an ad on craigslist so that he can then spend hours on end in that closet area in that 1 bedroom apartment in an urban area answering phonecalls from pretenders saying they'd like to make an appointment or detectives trying to set him up; finally I demand that the OP after making some money off of a client then give 80% of it to the primary renter to pay for that closet space............ when you've accomplished that, feel free to post a fair observation of what many of these girls go through

Preach that gospel! lol

[MrsKellyPierce]

Oh and furthermore I prefer to call them "massage therapist" rather than escorts

[sucka4chix]

Good grief. It wasn't that serious. The ramblings of a conflicted man, and the mention of God was so small, but y'all made it so BIG! I always find that curious. This was all HIS editorial. It was not very intellectual but neither was the response.