Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    5 Star Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    2,215

    Default

    @ Vicky
    Touche. though I may have quoted those numbers wrong. 34% is still allot.

    @ Real girls 4 me.

    I dual boot linux. Why not go liux all the way? Because I use 64 bit and 64 bit support is still spotty in terms of internet applications. Such as no 64 bit flash, or 64 bit java plugin. It does my killer app, Mathematica, beautifully.



  2. #12
    Professional Poster kukm4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,456

    Default

    Vista upgrade invalidates your XP key

    http://www.tomcoyote.org/tech/vista-...our-xp-key/74/



  3. #13
    Junior Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    KC MO USA
    Posts
    142

    Default

    Did you see the CNN interview of Bill Gates regarding Vista?

    CNN: "Vista looks like OS X. Did you go for a more 'Mac look' this time Bill?"
    Bill: "No, no. With Vista we really innovated. You can edit pictures and movies...and send files over the Internet" WHAT THE FUCK?

    The point here is to STOP giving Micosoft money. Dont be a bunch of Lemmings. Bill Gates himself barely held a straight face denying the blatent copy of OS X. Its CRIMINAL.

    The BIGGEST software company in the world cant even design thier OS without stealing 70% of it? I am really dissapointed and saddened by the lack of talent and vision in Redmond.

    You have MUCH better offerings out there now guys. Its 2007 for god's sakes.

    Go buy OS X
    Go buy Linux


    OS X costs 100 bucks.
    Vista costs between 128 and 400 bucks.
    Linux can be FREE.



  4. #14
    Professional Poster Fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Compton, CA
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Kinda surprised no one mentioned the Vista EULA lol.


    "Can't worry about what another nigga think, now that's liberation and baby I want it."
    -OutKast

  5. #15
    Rookie Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Wichita KS
    Posts
    66

    Default

    From what I've read so far, Vista seems to have a lot of upgrades and general reworking of the audio engine, for the better. XP was great, but Vista seems to be really on the ball with audio. I'm a musician and a recording engineer and I work with PC's, so this is a good thing for me. The cosmetic things don't really matter to me. I put things back to the Win98 look anyway to save recources. Better driver handling, individual volume controls per app, putting audio apps over everything else in terms of processor use, things like this will make any audio engineer's life easier. I'm going to be checking it out more thoroughly soon to see if it lives up to what I've read. Hopefully it measures up.


    ~Matthias

  6. #16
    Silver Poster Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, among other places.
    Posts
    3,583

    Default

    Two separate friends I know have given Vista a try, and both have had huge problems with the upgrade. Frankly, given Microsoft's poor track record with product releases, this doesn't come as a surprise.

    -Quinn


    Life is essentially one long Benny Hill skit punctuated by the occasional Anne Frank moment.

  7. #17
    5 Star Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    2,415

    Default

    I feel like I've got the best of both worlds right now. For the past six years I've used my Mac G4 with Cubase. But then I got a deal on a Dell server (400SC) that all these musicians were raving about for it's reliabilty and silent operation. It runs Nuendo, Tracktion and Live. But they warned me not to risk putting it onto a network. So i sold the G4 and bought a slightly used mac mini off craigslist for $400. This thing kicks ass, and I've eaten sandwiches bigger than this computer. So now i'm cross-platform and have two great computers for $800. Staying off the leading edge avoids the expense of buying new, and the frustration of buggy apps.



  8. #18
    Silver Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    3,694

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinn
    Two separate friends I know have given Vista a try, and both have had huge problems with the upgrade. Frankly, given Microsoft's poor track record with product releases, this doesn't come as a surprise.

    -Quinn
    it still looks and works like the beta version. nothing special, design is the only small fascination but it canīt top XP for now. I donīt know, hope they release some updates, otherwise, it ends up in my garbage can....



  9. #19
    Gold Poster peggygee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the hearts of the kind, and in the fears of the wicked.
    Posts
    3,968

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BrendaQG
    @ Vicky

    I dual boot linux. Why not go liux all the way? Because I use 64 bit and 64 bit support is still spotty in terms of internet applications. Such as no 64 bit flash, or 64 bit java plugin. It does my killer app, Mathematica, beautifully.
    I also utilize a number of platforms with XP, Linux and 2003 Server
    on one of my laptops. Then in my personal network I also have a
    Mac box, and a broken Unix box, as well as a coupla server and XP
    boxes.

    My plan for world domination procedes unabated




  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suckseed
    I feel like I've got the best of both worlds right now. For the past six years I've used my Mac G4 with Cubase. But then I got a deal on a Dell server (400SC) that all these musicians were raving about for it's reliabilty and silent operation. It runs Nuendo, Tracktion and Live. But they warned me not to risk putting it onto a network. So i sold the G4 and bought a slightly used mac mini off craigslist for $400. This thing kicks ass, and I've eaten sandwiches bigger than this computer. So now i'm cross-platform and have two great computers for $800. Staying off the leading edge avoids the expense of buying new, and the frustration of buggy apps.
    So you run LIVE huh?
    Im just learning it now.
    Im kinda worried that its Midi capabilities WONT be as robust as what I am use to.
    For instance....quantizing......Im coming from Digital Performer and the quantize templates for LIVE seem kinda weak.
    Im in the middle of deciding whether to upgrade to LIVE 6 or Digital Performer 5.

    Any advice?



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •