Has HA Become Politically Correct?

[Ecstatic]

What I do not particulary understand- is how so many men on thos board swear up and down that they like gg's as well- yet so many fiend for the largest dick around, even on a cd with a wig and a padded bra on (I am not pasing judgement, just statign facts)- yet when a girl undergoes SRS it's almost like she commited some unforgiveable crime to somw? I wish someone would help me understand this better because quite frankly that reasoning is a bit flawed. i think the truth of the matter is, is that there are alot of men on this board whose preffrence overall is pre-op transsexuals but they use the , 'i like women too', as some sort of gaurd when in fact they might find women sexually attractive-but generally seek pre-op girls.

True, true, Allanah. Heaven knows I find women sexually attractive, but I definitely seek pre-op girls first and foremost. However, I don't use "I like women too" as a guard; while my preference and primary attraction is to a pre-op transwoman, it is by no means exclusive. Over the past couple of months, in fact, my sexual encounters have been with a wonderful post-op transwoman. I love being with her. But I still "generally seek pre-op girls." I'm not hetero, or bi, I'm pansexual with a preference for pre-op girls: and I've never seen a term for that!

Peggygee: LOL @ soap on a rope.....

[whatsupwithat]

I've never seen a term for that!

Exactly. We're all shades of the same color. But what color exactly are we? I think we, the men, need a name, an identifier that's positive, that identifies us to ourselves, to each other and to society at large. Something we can own and be proud of.

I mean, if we went with the way heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual and the like were set up in society and in people's minds and ideas of others...that would make us what? transsexual, as well, no?

[Ecstatic]

Exactly. We're all shades of the same color. But what color exactly are we? I think we, the men, need a name, an identifier that's positive, that identifies us to ourselves, to each other and to society at large. Something we can own and be proud of.

I mean, if we went with the way heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual and the like were set up in society and in people's minds and ideas of others...that would make us what? transsexual, as well, no?

I had this discussion with the guy who runs URNA, where the term of choice is "tranny chaser," which he prefers and uses. Thing is, in his context, the term works, but unfortunately, in the wider context (and particularly amongst TS themselves), the term is derogatory. "Tranny admirer" is not a whole lot better: yes, it clears up the "chasing" image of pathetically persuing any "telephone pole in a skirt" (lol at that image), but frankly I don't admire anyone purely for what category they fall into.
"Respect" is closer than "admiration" but still not quite on.

It's not in wide circulation, but how about transphile? TSRoadMap gives the following definition: "transphile or transophile: someone attracted to transgendered women."

[RangeHova]

Though I am slighly confused, are you attempting
to help these guys see the error of their ways.

Or are you being a devils advocate.

For once again, I will say if a guy doesn't have a vested
interest in the transcommunity, he shouldn't have a say so.
And even then it is a fairly limited say so.

If he is just some guy looking at dick picks, he doesn't get a vote.

Perhaps the guy who has had a relationship with a transwoman,
would know wherof he speaks.

It is not about help these guys but more me checking my own believes about these guys. Seeing how I have had numerous real relationships, friendships and just real world interactions with such women, in some ways I felt a little more enlightened and almost had an arrogence about the vested interest that I have.

I just don't think we can take talk, opinions, ideas, objections, etc. given on a porn based messgae board all that serious. Vested interest, more enlightened, or a woman living her life as she sees foot shouldn't IMO expect a place where most people are only here to get a picture or two to jack off with to really give a real damn about the things that we care about.

I blame a lot of this on the fact that there are so few places where those with interest beyond the sexual and the kink factor can discuss and interact with one another. The moment that you try to start such a place it becomes over run with those without vested inetrest looking for cheap hookups and jack off inspirations.

I doubt that so many girls would post and lurk here if there were other less sexually based options.

I think it is wrong for us to beat up on guys that are lookin for chicks with dicks on a board called Hung Angels. It is like not understanding why the guys at the strip club don't want for thier stripper to do anything but strip for him.

[whatsupwithat]

Exactly. We're all shades of the same color. But what color exactly are we? I think we, the men, need a name, an identifier that's positive, that identifies us to ourselves, to each other and to society at large. Something we can own and be proud of.

I mean, if we went with the way heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual and the like were set up in society and in people's minds and ideas of others...that would make us what? transsexual, as well, no?

I had this discussion with the guy who runs URNA, where the term of choice is "tranny chaser," which he prefers and uses. Thing is, in his context, the term works, but unfortunately, in the wider context (and particularly amongst TS themselves), the term is derogatory. "Tranny admirer" is not a whole lot better: yes, it clears up the "chasing" image of pathetically persuing any "telephone pole in a skirt" (lol at that image), but frankly I don't admire anyone purely for what category they fall into.
"Respect" is closer than "admiration" but still not quite on.

It's not in wide circulation, but how about transphile? TSRoadMap gives the following definition: "transphile or transophile: someone attracted to transgendered women."

transphile...it sounds like an obsession as opposed to an actual desire for a respectful and mutually rewarding relationship, no?

[RangeHova]

accidentally double posted

[whatsupwithat]

Unisex

I so love your quote.

[sucka4chix]

But my eyes tended
to more often see the smaller size 14 font
HungAngels - Guide to Shemales
and Transsexuals Forum Index -> General Discussion.

It's smaller for a reason.Why would you not expect guys on the HUNG ANGELS BOARD not to like cock?
I never thought on THE HUNG ANGELS BOARD you'd get grief for liking
HUNG ANGELS...makes no sense!

However on more than one occasion, and in this
thread in particular it has been driven home to me,
that most guys want COCK, and that's cool. Shrug

I'm sorry, it just doesn't seem cool.

But how much real respect can you expect on a porn board?

Exactly.

I am a post op transwoman, but that's not the reason I come down on anti post op people, it is because they want to condemn or chastise a woman for the choices, she makes with her body.

I have not read every post, but I haven't seen alot of examples of condemnation of a WOMAN for the choices she makes. I don't remember ANY post where someone disapproved of the WOMAN, because she is post-op. But I have seen several post where people are not fond of surgically made vagina-- this has nothing to to with the person! I've also seen several posts where a guy is condemned for not being fond of said vagina.

For once again, I will say if a guy doesn't have a vested
interest in the transcommunity, he shouldn't have a say so.
And even then it is a fairly limited say so.

If he is just some guy looking at dick picks, he doesn't get a vote. Going to a provider once a month, or wanking off to internet
porn doesn't give you much say so other than to say that's
not the type of porn you like or don't like.

I think that's all most people are saying. No one's opinion here is a vote on what someone should do with their body. There shouldn't be a pre-requisite for expressing your OPINION on this forum, people just need to realize someone's opinion is not a personal attack.

If some are hating on the person, let me differentiate myself from them.
I personally like pre-op transsexuals. I come to this forum to keep up with what's going in this community and to find events to meet them. I am not "anti post-op" (how silly), I just don't find man made pussy attractive but has no effect on how I feel about a person. I'm not fond of breast implants or tattoos either, I guess I'm just an awful person who should be condemned!

[sucka4chix]

Thus I propose, a change in the name of the board.
And maybe the cock lovers could wear these
tshirts, so that we could differentiate them from
the guys who like all women, irregardless of
what's between their legs.


Perhaps this will prevent other women or guys
that 'truly ' like women from being confused.


Oh, and you may want to go with the matching shorts,
you know in case you are in the locker room, on the
way to the shower.


But do be careful in there, if you see a cock, cause I
would hate like heck for you to have to post another
Am I Gay, If, thread? Rolling Eyes

Sigh

[sucka4chix]

What I do not particulary understand- is how so many men on thos board swear up and down that they like gg's as well- yet so many fiend for the largest dick around, even on a cd with a wig and a padded bra on (I am not pasing judgement, just statign facts)- yet when a girl undergoes SRS it's almost like she commited some unforgiveable crime to somw? I wish someone would help me understand this better because quite frankly that reasoning is a bit flawed. i think the truth of the matter is, is that there are alot of men on this board whose preffrence overall is pre-op transsexuals but they use the , 'i like women too', as some sort of gaurd when in fact they might find women sexually attractive-but generally seek pre-op girls.

" If the penis wasn't so damn well engineered" (that's a quote from girlfriends).
I used to think that pussy was the most powerful thing on the planet, but I've recently changed my mind. If you like cock, it has a more inexplicable hypnotizing effect. I fiend for it more than I ever did pussy. And that's the perfect word, fiend. I can't really explain it, but cock, being external as opposed to pussy being mostly internal, is alot more to look at, and men are sexually visual. It creates a bulge which peaks interest, it grows, it pulsates,it bounces, it spews. It's a infinite array of visual entertainment, surpassing even breasts!
Can't speak for all, but I do like GGs, I love the essence of a woman. But sexually it's just a fact that a pre-op TS has more to offer-- you can do everything you can with a GG,plus!
As a post-op, the "plus" is gone. She has not committed a crime--- you guys are getting it twisted, but she has dropped her sexual status to that of someone with a pussy, and if a guy wants pussy why not go for the natural version?
BTW, Allanah you know me but I guess I'll stay anonymous so you won't dislike me for my views on this