Results 471 to 480 of 610
Thread: Coronavirus
-
12-21-2020 #471
-
12-22-2020 #472
Re: Coronavirus
Humans are not resources. Coronavirus shows why we must democratise work:
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...h-lives-market
-
12-22-2020 #473
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 13,588
Re: Coronavirus
Medical thread, medical version of queer. Or, I felt ill. Some of her relatives have had Covid-19, through school and university, and I looked at that off-white fabric, and then it started, and I stepped away. But I guess it proves that Marks & Spencer underwear last for years.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
12-23-2020 #474
-
12-23-2020 #475
Re: Coronavirus
Recovery rate is over 97%
https://www.webmd.com/lung/covid-rec...20and%2099.75%.
Experts also don’t have information about the outcome of every infection. However, early estimates predict that the overall COVID-19 recovery rate is between 97% and 99.75%.
0 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
12-23-2020 #476
Re: Coronavirus
I flew to see my parents for Christmas on Dec. 20. Plane was only about 2/3 full. Only a few middle aisle seats and I assume those were families sitting together in the same row.
I was stunned and pleasantly surprised. Normally that flight is packed from front to back
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
12-23-2020 #477
Re: Coronavirus
Anyone know anything about potential HIV infection/susceptibility from potential Covid vaccines?
https://www.ajmc.com/view/researcher...id-19-vaccines
0 out of 1 members liked this post.
-
12-23-2020 #478
Re: Coronavirus
2 out of 3 members liked this post."We can't seem to cure them of the idea that our everyday life is only an illusion, behind which lies the reality of dreams."--Old Missionary, Fitzcarraldo
-
12-23-2020 #479
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 4,709
Re: Coronavirus
A vaccine that was in development stages in Australia used an HIV viral protein as part of its design. There was no risk of people developing HIV because it was a protein from the virus and was not capable of replicating, but it raised some of the same antibodies that HIV antibody tests are sensitive to. There are PCR tests for HIV but they are more expensive and it would be a major flaw for a vaccine to cause false positives on antibody tests for HIV because it's the primary means of testing for it. But they WERE false positives. Nobody was HIV positive or at risk of it.
https://www.bioworld.com/articles/50...onse?v=preview
It was not one of the major vaccines developed by Pfizer, Astrazeneca, GSK, Moderna, or Johnson and Johnson etc.
Your article talks about the risk with AD5 vaccines. I just assumed it dealt with the Queensland vaccine because I had just read about it. If you're concerned, neither Pfizer nor Moderna are adenovirus vaccines.
1 out of 1 members liked this post.Last edited by broncofan; 12-23-2020 at 02:10 PM.
-
12-23-2020 #480
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 4,709
Re: Coronavirus
"In addition to the Ad5 COVID-19 vaccine candidates, several other leading vaccines, including ones made by Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca/the University of Oxford, use different adenoviruses as vectors. There’s no evidence that any of those adenoviruses increases the risks of an HIV infection."
The article below says only the Russian state vaccine and Cansino biologics, a vaccine in China use the ad5 vector. There isn't any evidence that those particular vaccines increase risk for HIV but if it's a heightened concern there are a half dozen other vaccines that use different technologies, different adenoviruses as vectors, and an inactivated virus vaccine.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/10/could-certain-covid-19-vaccines-leave-people-more-vulnerable-aids-virus
1 out of 1 members liked this post.