Who's the Hottest: Khloe Kay, Chanel Santini or Daisy Taylor?

[Nick Danger]

1. Daisy Taylor
2. Everyone Else

There, that's not so cutthroat.

[LilyRox]

I always think the term "hot," when describing an individual in porn , is probably akin to the term "sexy". The term "hot" therefore would definitely include performance...since performance would add to the hotness of an individual. Hotness (Sexiness) isn't about the most beautiful or best looking then...in fact, I've seen individuals in porn, that in terms of aesthetics would probably be termed unattractive, but were incredibly hot.
But all 'opinions' on any kind of attractiveness are biased.
BTW...these three girls are some of the tops in terms of looks in the industry anyway (at the moment), so as time goes on the scales would continuously shift.
No one (including you) is the arbiter of good looks...so you couldn't 'easily' tell who would win even if it was purely based on that. It's just your opinion.

I mean when I wrote that no one was winning and its up to landslide from what I knew was going to be picked even after purposely balancing my vote in something else and I'm not even attracted to TS. Symmetry isn't really subjective when polled across a group of people. People can have tastes, but there's a reason why girls like Audrey Hepburn are iconic and it has nothing to do with the fashion or hairstyle.

[filghy2]

This sounds like a version of the old philosophical conundrum - 55 people thought they were exercising their free will in voting, but the outcome was predetermined. Now we know there is no point doing any more of these surveys - we can just ask Lily.

[Lester316]

They are all stunning in their own way; what's the point of the poll really.

[GroobySteven]

I guess all those getting upset about this would like to abolish the TEAs as well. Take a deep breath people. Like it or not, the desire to rank things is just human nature. I don't think anyone's going to care too much about who gets more votes among a small group of people here. These girls operate in a commercial market place which is going to provide a measure of popularity anyway.

I disagree - the TEA's are based on performance and what they bring to a scene - this appears based on looks. How do you judge one girl against another based just on looks? And why?

I find these threads a little stomach turning and unhelpful./

[Nick Danger]

I disagree - the TEA's are based on performance and what they bring to a scene - this appears based on looks. How do you judge one girl against another based just on looks? And why?

I find these threads a little stomach turning and unhelpful./

Well isn't it that unspoken thing, Steven? We have had beauty pageants in America since (Google pause) 1864, and there's always a talent portion. But somehow the most talented girl never wins.

The silver screen is absolutely lousy with beautiful women who can't act any role besides themselves in a different outfit.

Beautiful women never have a problem finding a job, they'll be hired by the first red-blooded male who interviews them, whether they are qualified for the position or not.

The why's have become irrelevant over the course of countless centuries of humanity. It's just a fact of life.

Women want us to see how physically attractive they are, they want to be judged based on how physically attractive they are, and for the most part, if they can live an easy life married to some rich guy because they're beautiful, they are not categorically opposed to the idea.

Unattractive women, of course, insist on being judged by different standards, but men aren't interested in their standards. At all.

As for Daisy Taylor, though, I'm not really judging her on looks. I mean, she's a cutie, for sure - maybe has a little bit of a pug nose. She represents no one's criteria for physical perfection, but very good-looking? Yes, she's that, and her body is in its prime, which doesn't hurt.

But I like her because she obviously loves to fuck. She's totally into it, at a higher level than most other t-girls. Could be because she's making vids with her hubby and it's all about the love, but I don't care why it is. She's my favorite. I'm a fan. I greatly enjoy her performances, so I voted for her and I don't feel a bit bad about it, nor do I see any problem with a poll judging porn stars on their hotness. Hotness is their business, yes? Be it physical or otherwise.

[Fitzcarraldo]

Our resident Id Monster has spoken.

[LilyRox]

Well isn't it that unspoken thing, Steven? We have had beauty pageants in America since (Google pause) 1864, and there's always a talent portion. But somehow the most talented girl never wins.

I mean with beauty pageants they really don't do anything and besides the fact its what the girls signed up for. I don't think most girls in any area of porn want to judged 100% on just their looks. If that was the case, wouldn't they just do modelling? Porn is a lot more than just a face or body.

Like I said performance with a combination of looks is a huge factor. There's only so much you can do with looks on your own, but why would you judge pornstars based on purely looks? Chanel Santini wins this easily in performance, but that doesn't matter here, it's going to be about something she can't change.

[Nick Danger]

Our resident Id Monster has spoken.

Hey, I'm just a guy who never had any reason to be politically correct, so I don't have to make any adjustments now that it's going out of style. The rest of you need to catch up with the times, we don't have to act like a bunch of pauncy hairdressers anymore.

[Nick Danger]

I mean with beauty pageants they really don't do anything and besides the fact its what the girls signed up for. I don't think most girls in any area of porn want to judged 100% on just their looks. If that was the case, wouldn't they just do modelling? Porn is a lot more than just a face or body.

Like I said performance with a combination of looks is a huge factor. There's only so much you can do with looks on your own, but why would you judge pornstars based on purely looks? Chanel Santini wins this easily in performance, but that doesn't matter here, it's going to be about something she can't change.

Fair enough, Lily. But here's something to think about - I don't find Chanel Santini particularly attractive. I know she's hugely popular, and I'm sure she is objectively attractive, but there's something about her face I find off-putting and I don't watch her videos - at least, not often; she obviously does a lot of videos and she turns up here and there whether I'm looking for her or not.

But my point is, I don't know much about her performances because I don't watch them because I don't find her attractive enough to go looking for her videos. So where does that leave us? I think it leaves us at - being attractive is basically a prerequisite for getting people to watch your porn videos in the first place.

And I'll add this: Back when I was watching nothing but straight porn (the 80's), my favorite porn star, BY FAR, was Tori Welles. I don't know if you even know who she is, but she was not the most beautiful porn star in the business, nor was she the most talented, nor did she do my favorite positions more than others or anything like that. It was nothing more than a look she got in her eye when she was being fucked and loving it. And isn't that the whole point of porn - that fantasy where you're the one fucking the girl and she's LOVING IT?

That's why I love Daisy Taylor - just that look she gets in her eyes now and then is enough.