Who's the Hottest: Khloe Kay, Chanel Santini or Daisy Taylor?

[Fitzcarraldo]

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I guess your speciality is the irrelevant snarky comment. Would it change anything if I'd used another word like indifferent? Is feigned indifference better than feigned insouciance?

Ah, so now it's a conspiracy. I had no idea. Who is the third?

[SanDiegoPervySage]

I mean with beauty pageants they really don't do anything and besides the fact its what the girls signed up for. I don't think most girls in any area of porn want to judged 100% on just their looks. If that was the case, wouldn't they just do modelling? Porn is a lot more than just a face or body.

Like I said performance with a combination of looks is a huge factor. There's only so much you can do with looks on your own, but why would you judge pornstars based on purely looks? Chanel Santini wins this easily in performance, but that doesn't matter here, it's going to be about something she can't change.

Modeling probably won't lead to being profitable like porn can if their goal is to make money selling ass. Do porn, raise your profile and they can charge more money for sex. I'm guessing you can't really do that with modeling. There's tons of shitty performers out there and tons of popular shitty performers. I'm sure a lot of the big name shit performers don't care about being the best. As long as they're getting that check, and lots of them.

[Josh_64]

There are some great girls out there right now. I would add Casey Kisses and Korra Del Rio. My favorite is def Daisy now. She is the most beautiful tgirl since Bianca Freire.

[Murmdrum]

[filghy2]

My first comment said all I needed to say regarding the topic. And GroobySteven said essentially the same thing I did. You can analyze it all you want and look for fallacies and logical loopholes, but that doesn't change how anyone feels.

If you said all you needed to say in your first post then what was the point of all the others? 83 people have now voted, so the arguments you and a few others made have been rejected overwhelmingly. Do you think you dissuaded anyone at all from voting? I wouldn't be surprised if some of them voted just because you were telling them they should not be doing it.

[LilyRox]

Modeling probably won't lead to being profitable like porn can if their goal is to make money selling ass. Do porn, raise your profile and they can charge more money for sex. I'm guessing you can't really do that with modeling. There's tons of shitty performers out there and tons of popular shitty performers. I'm sure a lot of the big name shit performers don't care about being the best. As long as they're getting that check, and lots of them.

Branding is basically grouped into modelling. Actual modelling doesn't really pay much, but it gives you a path way into other areas that can be extremely lucrative. I mean its not common by any means, but someone has to do it. Kylie Jenner is worth over 1 billion dollars from basically just getting surgery on her average looking face, taking selfies, and selling products tied to the Kardashian name.

You aren't going to find that in any area of porn as a performer and its not going to set up your future outside of the business. Even if you fail as model (which you have to assume 99% that you will) it can gateway you into the fashion industry as a whole or even into jobs outside of the industry, where as porn you aren't going to have anything to put on your resume if you decide to quit (Unless you have the skills to be a producer, but that's abnormal).

There's a big difference doing porn till 30 and having no experience to show at all vs going into an interview and having the ability to show you've been across the world modelling for the last decade even if you didn't do much.

Porn, escorting, and camming is very short term cash for girls vs modelling is an extremely risky area where you'll most likely fail; however, can set up your future in the fashion industry or even just a regular 9 to 5. If you have the face and body for modelling I don't see why you wouldn't do it over porn unless you're that fixated for fast cash.

[Laphroaig]

Agreed, apples vs oranges vs bananas, it's all personal preferences anyway...

At least I'm consistent...

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...ss#post1801128

[Fitzcarraldo]

If you said all you needed to say in your first post then what was the point of all the others? 83 people have now voted, so the arguments you and a few others made have been rejected overwhelmingly. Do you think you dissuaded anyone at all from voting? I wouldn't be surprised if some of them voted just because you were telling them they should not be doing it.

Most of my posts have been responses to posts by you directed at me. I suppose you're right, though--that is pretty pointless.

I never made an argument. I stated an opinion. You proceed under erroneous assumptions. You assumed I was upset. You assumed I was trying to persuade people. You assume I'm conspiring with others. And you assume I care about what you have to say.

I don't care who voted or how they voted. I didn't vote. I think it's a dumb idea. You're not going to convince me otherwise with logic or a thesaurus.

[filghy2]

At least I'm consistent...

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...ss#post1801128

You know people do choose between apples. oranges and bananas all the time? Isn't it a circular argument to say it's not right to poll people's preferences because it's all a matter of personal preference?

[filghy2]

And you assume I care about what you have to say.

If you don't care about what I have to say, why is it that you have to keep responding?