Who's the Hottest: Khloe Kay, Chanel Santini or Daisy Taylor?

[Nick Danger]

No need to get upset about logic. That doesn't change Stavros' point.

Which is what exactly? That virtue-signalers shouldn't take polls?

[filghy2]

Insouciant.. really? Did someone buy you word of the day toilet paper? Dropping that one twice in a sentence screams a lack of confidence in plain simple language.

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I guess your speciality is the irrelevant snarky comment. Would it change anything if I'd used another word like indifferent? Is feigned indifference better than feigned insouciance?

[filghy2]

Which is what exactly? That virtue-signalers shouldn't take polls?

Only if they tell everyone about it Nick. Otherwise it's like the proverbial tree falling in the forest.

[Lester316]

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I can do the glib put-down as well Lester. What else have you got?

That's three times out of two posts for glib also; do you actually know what it means?

To be clear the mockery of your odd linguistic choices highlighted by my previous comment was thoroughly sincere.

[Lester316]

What is this? Have you made a pledge like the three musketeers - "all for one and one for all"? Or is it the three amigos?

I guess your speciality is the irrelevant snarky comment. Would it change anything if I'd used another word like indifferent? Is feigned indifference better than feigned insouciance?

Also thank you snark is a speciality of mine! But I like it to be somewhat relevant so I actually commented on the irrelevance of the poll at the same time because multi-taking is fun.

[filghy2]

Also my response to this thread is that I have not voted as I find polls such as these irrelevant, redundant and reductive. Each performer has their own great merits; plus tastes in which performers people like are completely subjective so the thread is actually a waste of time.

That's three times out of two posts for glib also; do you actually know what it means?

To be clear the mockery of your odd linguistic choices highlighted by my previous comment was thoroughly sincere.

Are you a linguist Lester? How long did you spend on the near-alliteration of "irrelevant, redundant and reductive"? That's another word you can add to your list.

Sorry, I forgot to mention your other speciality - the meaningless platitude masquerading (sorry, posing) as wisdom. Isn't just about every opinion poll a poll of peoples' subjective opinions? Don't people spending good money on these realise it's a waste?

To be clear my comments are thoroughly sincere. Happy musketeering.

[Ziggy33]

Miran

[Lester316]

Are you a linguist Lester? How long did you spend on the near-alliteration of "irrelevant, redundant and reductive"? That's another word you can add to your list.

Sorry, I forgot to mention your other speciality - the meaningless platitude masquerading (sorry, posing) as wisdom. Isn't just about every opinion poll a poll of peoples' subjective opinions? Don't people spending good money on these realise it's a waste?

To be clear my comments are thoroughly sincere. Happy musketeering.

You really are quite over defensive about the poll; it's almost sweet. And yes I'm well aware of alliteration (it wasn't planned out though, it just happened); as like many people I was told by an English teacher at school always mention it during an exam.

Perhaps you are still gleefully clinging onto the thesaurus you were given for your exams and that's where insouciant came from...

After all it probably is a bit too complicated for the word of the day toilet paper crowd so got to give you some credit there.

[Nick Danger]

I could give readers of HA a list of the performers who don't excite me, and those that do -but would it say something about the people named, or something about me- and who is interested in that? So I have not voted in this poll.

You're right and wrong, Stavros, but mostly wrong. What you're right about is that no one is interested in seeing a list of performers who excite you or don't. What you're wrong about is that your non-participation in this poll is some kind of statement. The actual statement you're making relates much more to the fact that you feel compelled to self-promote your non-participation, but hey, I get it - you just want to remind everyone that you're up there and we're down here.

We can't all be rated by exactly what we want to be rated by. As a middle-aged single male, I'd prefer to be rated on life experience and wisdom. Instead I'm rated on what kind of car I drive, what neighborhood I live in, and how much capital I can produce annually.

But I'm a private citizen. Public performers are fair game for rating in any way that's fun for the fans. If the performers get their feelings hurt, that's on them - they put it out there.

Many of the music artists I've known in my life refuse to read their own press. That's one strategy for avoiding even the remote possibility of getting emotionally stung by negative public opinion. And most of them were absolutely right - they would have gotten their feelings hurt if they read what people were writing about them. Comes with the territory.

I don't see why porn stars are any different from other public performers. And if they want to be rated on performance and not appearance, this poll seems to fill that bill - the poll question is "Who is the hottest?" Hotness encompasses performance IMO.

[Fitzcarraldo]

Why must I respond to everyone's comments? I think point 1 above addresses it indirectly anyway. I notice you haven't responded to any point I've made either.

It looks like feigning insouciance with some kind of glib comment is your 'go to' response Fitzy. You've already responded to this thread 7 times so I don't think you can be too insouciant. You seem to a person who can't let things go but lacks the confidence to expose himself by making any response on substance.

Now let's see if you can resist the impulse to make another glib response just to save face.

Does insouciance upset you?

My first comment said all I needed to say regarding the topic. And GroobySteven said essentially the same thing I did. You can analyze it all you want and look for fallacies and logical loopholes, but that doesn't change how anyone feels.