Controversial Question

[timetoplay2468]

Why is it that when you cut through the garbage of most of the incoherent threads, the op really just wants to say "I'm straighter and more masculine than you?" It's juvenile as hell. I don't have any commentary on it except to say that if you mix with enough people there are probably those who would judge you the same way you judge other people. And that's wrong, but why pretend there's this conspiracy against tops when really you just want to tout your masculinity?

There’s the assumption again. I’m not touting my masculinity. Just asking a question on something I’ve noticed on this site.

[timetoplay2468]

There's that, but I also think he may really be a sort of sexual puritan obsessed about "true" TS love being corrupted by depraved "fetishism". It really sounds like a variant of the rigid old-fashioned view of male and female sex roles translated into transsexuality.

Interestingly, of the 22 posts he has made, all but three are related to this issue. He actually started another thread with an even longer diatribe on a similar theme. http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...70#post1855170 But he's not obsessed of course.

Wow you went so far as to look up my info on my profile. Why??? What were you hoping to find. Just to start more shit right??? now that’s juvenile. Also This post is geared towards other posts I’ve seen talking about Sean Michaels and other members on the post. Did you ever think of that???

[filghy2]

And you don’t have to worry about me posting.

Well that didn't last long. You know the more you keep responding, the more laughably pathetic your repeated claims not to care too much about this look.

Self-awareness really isn't your strong suit, is it.

[broncofan]

There's that, but I also think he may really be a sort of sexual puritan obsessed about "true" TS love being corrupted by depraved "fetishism". It really sounds like a variant of the rigid old-fashioned view of male and female sex roles translated into transsexuality.

Interestingly, of the 22 posts he has made, all but three are related to this issue. He actually started another thread with an even longer diatribe on a similar theme. http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...70#post1855170 But he's not obsessed of course.

Thanks for the reading material. I did notice that but I didn't take it sincerely because he almost makes it sound like he decided to be a top because it's affirming to ts women. Obviously if he's a top it's because that's what he likes. Then there was the weird stuff about touching the penis to provide a "helping hand", as though he needed to say it's for them not him. I'm surprised he didn't say he closes his eyes when he does it.

The idea about him really respecting ts women and others being fetishists is there as you say, and I think it and the masculinity stuff is self-justification. I don't understand the hierarchies people try to create around sex. Like what you like. Find someone you're compatible with and who likes you. That's it.

[broncofan]

There’s the assumption again. I’m not touting my masculinity. Just asking a question on something I’ve noticed on this site.

You couldn't have noticed something that didn't happen. The person who agreed with you is Mr. Fanti. I have no other comments about that.

All that weird extraneous stuff about the appeal of masculinity and other people's inferior likes was what exactly? Do you even lift bro?

[filghy2]

I did notice that but I didn't take it sincerely because he almost makes it sound like he decided to be a top because it's affirming to ts women. Obviously if he's a top it's because that's what he likes.

I don't understand the hierarchies people try to create around sex.

Actually, there's quite a few top-only guys on this forum who feel the need to justify their preferences in those terms, though they are not usually as extreme as this guy. I think there's pretty clear reason why some TS admirers feel the need to differentiate themselves from others. But obviously saying that is just further evidence of the conspiracy to shame top-only guys.

[crazyeditor]

True at the end of the day it’s what you like and what your into.

Indeed

[Laphroaig]

If you look in the stories section you’ll. Find evidence of this.

Still waiting on examples of this evidence...

Did it ever occur to you that I don’t argue back with a person. It’s fucking pointless. It’s childish. We obviously don’t agree with each other and we’re not going to change our minds so why would I keep going. You obviously want to start drama. Did it also occur to you that I actually have a life to live instead of arguing with someone online.

As I've already said, I'm one of your alleged hated minority on here. I don't know how the others of us feel, but did it ever occur to you that I don't need white knighting and am perfectly capable speaking up for myself should the need ever arise, which it never has.

Don't try to speak on other peoples behalf when you haven't a clue, take your "research material" from fiction and porn, and can't form a coherent, consistent argument...

I think I came to the wrong place to express my thoughts. Maybe this site is only for men who only look at trans women as a fetish and ts women who don’t care or who don’t even realize.

It's been said many times before on here, which if you'd done your research properly you'd know, that this site doesn't always exactly represent the reality of the wider trans community. It's a porn forum after all...

[Laphroaig]

Actually, there's quite a few top-only guys on this forum who feel the need to justify their preferences in those terms, though they are not usually as extreme as this guy. I think there's pretty clear reason why some TS admirers feel the need to differentiate themselves from others. But obviously saying that is just further evidence of the conspiracy to shame top-only guys.

I've never felt the need to justify my preferences, but did often take the time to point them out when writing reviews. Usually to help prevent readers from wasting their time. Basically a warning that if you're a bottom this review will be of limited use to you.

[filghy2]

I've never felt the need to justify my preferences, but did often take the time to point them out when writing reviews.

To be clear, I have no objection to people expressing their preferences. My objection is to those who can only do so by putting down others in comparison. It's telling that our antagonist has spent very little time talking about what he likes and a lot of time worrying about what other people like.