to the girls: do you prefer to be stunning or passable?

[Cereal Escapist]

Plenty of people read the posts without responding to them.
I assume that if your girlfriend is going to the supermarket to buy groceries she will be dressed in trainers, jeans and a top, and if you are taking her to the Ballet, or a charity function at the Met, she will be stunning. And I guess if you love her, you won't judge her by the way she dresses anyway, be it Rihanna chic or the girl next door.
But I am not a girl, so what would I know?

I'm not trying to be disagreeable but there are some girls that look stunning in trainers, jeans and a tank too. That everyday look sometimes does it more for me than when a girl tries too hard or spends too much time with make up and picking the perfect $800 shoes to go great with her thrift store dress.

[susivilla]

why not a combo of both passable and stunning...

[MrFanti]

which makes your reply to this thread actually part of the problem.

No...
My reply was not a response to the OP's question....whereas quite a few others were.

Yes you are trying to be disagreeable......Cheers!

[nycguy1]

i suppose the definition of "passable" here seems to be "feminine" as close to a ggirl as passable. i think most if not nearly all guys would agree that it all depends on chemistry and attraction, irl or in porn. if that girl has that "it" factor that turns you on - whatever it happens to be - these categories and definitions don't matter.

i prefer girls that are very feminine like sapphire and, in general, ladyboys. asian girls are not my thing but they have the best frame and body makeup (including face) for the most feminine features.

why not a combo of both passable and stunning...

girls like vaniity in her youth is an example. same with patricia araujo.

[Cereal Escapist]

No...
My reply was not a response to the OP's question....whereas quite a few others were.

Yes you are trying to be disagreeable......Cheers!

lol. you are such a beta.

[MrFanti]

lol. you are such a beta.

Nope...Actually I'm a Sigma....
Anyways...
But I can tell you're quite sensitive.....

So Cheers!

[palomo7531]

I look more for thicker feminine style. That’s why I’m not huge into the ladyboy look. I like women with a nice thick ass and frame to support bigger tits. The way Bailey Jay looks right now and Melody Monae as well. I like beautiful faces but I would rather take a ok face and a thicker body than a super beautiful face and skinny frame.

[Paladin]

Well, three pages wasted so far.....

[Cereal Escapist]

Nope...Actually I'm a Sigma....
Anyways...
But I can tell you're quite sensitive.....

So Cheers!

you don't even know what that means which makes you even more beta.

Well, three pages wasted so far.....

the irony is, still no women have posted. perhaps all women want to be both stunning and passable so there is no need for them to answer the question.

[TSPornFan]

intrinsically, your request is flawed because who you and anyone else considers "gorgeous" or "passable" will vary substantially with your personal tastes and bias but here goes:

Transwomen that I consider amazing but not passable and easily clockable
kayleigh coxx
morgan bailey
tiffany starr
jenna tales
jaqueline woods
marissa minx
chanel noir
jonelle brooks
casey kisses
shiri allwood
brooklyn roberts
lianna lawson....I could go on but I think you get the point, women who are tall, broad shouldered, longer than usual torso and neck and facial features that are more "chiseled" than a ggirl usually has

AND quite a few Brazilian girls as many I lust after have quite non-passable features and physiques:
raica lima
deborah mastronelly
bianca alencar
nicole muller
barbara perez
victoria carvalho, etc

Now, commence the disagreement!

The I only girl I disagree with is Kayleigh Coxx. She has the girl next door look going well very. She's passable and pretty in my opinion.