The end of an Era.

[BeardedOne]

For the moment.

Looks like EROS is still online......

[BeardedOne]

Won't be here.

Have you noticed a big chunk of the boards disappeared over the past 48 hours?

Check it out. I'll wait.

Prepare to see more adds on fb,twitter, instagram, and snapchat. Hell, they may even advertise on here.

[Sabrina TS]

It can't last long and the sites are overreacting as the bills are only aimed at those who are complicit in sex trafficking.

[BeardedOne]

Agreed, so I'll weigh in, just to be fair.

Thanks Obama.

Ben, you're cool and all but take the blinders off and the reactionary Trump blaming. Trump will forever be a POS but Kamala Harris spearheaded this bill. Yes democrats can be ridiculous as well.

[BeardedOne]

All in the name of 'But it's to protect the children!'

Bathroom bills: To protect the children.

Delaware HB 35: To protect the children.

The Dems/libs are voting for this shit because in the current climate it is political suicide not to.

'Protecting the children' is the new third-rail of 'Merikan politics. Touch it and die.

Every one of these reams of fancy toilet paper is designed as a solution for problems that don't exist. Seriously, ever heard of a pimp using a credit card to buy advertising? Or buying advertising at all? Even if it's free, there's still an electronic paper trail. How many instances of trans people in public bathrooms assaulting anyone, or molesting children?

Post some examples (And show your work). I've got a newspaper to read while I wait for the answers.

Incredible. I'm blaming President Pumkinhead and it turns out this was the work of fucking feminist liberals.

[BeardedOne]

I swore I'd never use a site for which murders had been named, but I found a nice local masseuse that gets the kinks out (As it were) when I got curious one night. It was mostly just personals, and he didn't post as a professional, but I didn't just fall off the turnip boat yesterday so it's easily assumed.

What this legislation does is make that assumption as a legal accusation. An innocent f4m personal, seeking just a simple, social meet-up, can fry a site just for allowing 'Educated woman, 29, seeks gentleman for dinner and conversation. Let's see what happens.'. The Grundys will read 'Let's see what happens' as 'Bring cash 'cuz this kitty ain't cheap' while the intent might be little more than a second dinner date.

Wasn't aware people were still using CL for business. Around my area all the ads from pros get immediately flagged

[BeardedOne]

The fine print makes the advertisers complicit.

It can't last long and the sites are overreacting as the bills are only aimed at those who are complicit in sex trafficking.

[gaysian71]

Both FOSTA and SESTA were written and introduced by republicans. However, it got support from both republicans and democrats. It was passed for nothing more than to protect children from sex trafficking on the internet. Although I have to say that I have never seen an ad online offering underage children for sex and money, nor have any of the providers I have used been under age. That's not to say that it doesn't exist. It probably does and I have just not seen it. Because of that I can only speculate that this is one of those do nothing laws that make our lawmakers pat each other on the back so they can all say they care about children. What a waste of time and taxpayer money.

[tgirllover1]

Read the sticky at the top of this forum.

on a side note, who is that beauty that you have as your avatar, septemberboy?

[blackchubby38]

You know what I find fascinating about the closure of the Escort Reviews forum. The fact that there are bunch of posters coming out of the wood works asking about it, yet I don't think I have ever seen anyone of them post something else before.