GOP Pedophile Foley Resigns...desperate coverup ensues...

[chefmike]

LMFAO...tell the FBI, jackass! And keep pretending that there aren't multiple pages now involved in La Cage Au Foleygate!

And last but not least, keep drinking that neo-con neo-nazi kool-aid, stooge!

[White_Male_Canada]

LMFAO...tell the FBI, jackass! And keep pretending that there aren't multiple pages now involved in La Cage Au Foleygate!

And last but not least, keep drinking that neo-con neo-nazi kool-aid, stooge!

You don`t even know what the law is in DC,do you?

Are you that ignorant?

What is the age of consent in Washington DC ?

[thombergeron]

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h109-4472

[White_Male_Canada]

LMFAO...tell the FBI, jackass! And keep pretending that there aren't multiple pages now involved in La Cage Au Foleygate!

:

Sock puppet brain dead zombie nonsense.

There is no FBI "investigation".

The FBI said over the weekend that it had begun a preliminary assessment to determine whether Mr. Foley violated the law when he sent sexually explicit instant messages three years ago to at least one teenage congressional pagehtt/washingtontimes.com/national/20061005-114612-7581r.htm


The vast neo-marxist left wing Soros conspiracy machine is being found out. The Soros funded CREW gang had in their possession, the emails, as far back as April.

Law enforcement officials said then that the e-mails did not provide enough evidence of a possible crime to warrant a full investigation. In the e-mails, Foley praises the physical attributes of one page and asks another teenager for his picture.

In subsequent days, unidentified Justice and FBI officials told reporters that the e-mails provided by CREW were heavily redacted and that the group refused to provide unedited versions to the FBI. One law enforcement official -- speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation -- also told The Washington Post the FBI believed that CREW may have received the e-mails as early as April and that the group refused to tell the FBI how they were obtained.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse declined to comment on that issue but defended the FBI's handling of the original e-mails: "The e-mails, while inappropriate, did not contain a criminal predicate to allow the FBI to move forward in an investigation.

The dispute is the latest controversy this week for CREW, a liberal-leaning group that has come under attack from House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) and other Republicans because it has received money from a foundation funded by liberal financier George Soros."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...100501657.html

Why no investigation concerning emails?

Because the age of consent in DC is 16

THE QUESTION NOW IS,

IS CHEFMIKE A GAY-BASHER HOMOPHOBE AND

SHOULD HE BE BANNED FROM H.A.?

[tsluver247]

This scandal shows how Republicans are more worried about keeping their power than they are protecting innocent children. Politics over children. Where are the values and morals that the Republicans continue to talk about?

Matt Drudge blames the children for egging on Foley

Fox News lies and claims Foley is a Democrat

This scandal shows how Republicans are more worried about keeping their power than they are protecting innocent children. Politics over children. Where are the values and morals that the Republicans continue to talk about?

Matt Drudge blames the children for egging on Foley

Fox News lies and claims Foley is a Democrat

Is this the new lib-sissy strategy?

Throw out hysterical theory and then post non-sensical, hysterical link?

Between the sock puppet and you, I'm beginning to believe it.

[chefmike]

Surprised GOP Reacts-Thought Child Molestor Would Be 'Greeted As Liberator'

RJ Eskow

Welcome to another episode of "GOP/SVU: Special Victims Unit."

In yet another sign of their confusion and desperation, the Republicans have brought in their shady Mr. Fixit to clean up the Foley mess. Looks like they didn't see this problem coming, and were caught so off-guard they had to call on the capo di tutti capi.

Maybe they expected their predatory Congressman to be welcomed with flowers by the children he molested.

Quelle surprise. He didn't even get a box of chocolates.

Instead these young people went searching for help everywhere, hoping the adults in charge would protect them and other kids from the predator. But the GOP leadership left them to fend for themselves and when outside help finally arrived, their media lackeys went on the attack - against the victims.

What's the best defense they've come up with so far? "Hey, we've been letting our guy molest these kids for years! Why bring it up now? Must be political."

That didn't go over as well as they had hoped. So here's their next move: They're bringing in Jim Baker to clean up. You'll remember former Secretary of State Baker. He's the guy they called when it became clear they lost the 2000 election fair and square. He "fixed" that little problem pretty well, and now they want him to fix this.

Baker's the Republican version of "Mr. Wolfe," the Harvey Keitel character in Pulp Fiction - the one they call when Tarantino gets blood and brains all over his girlfriend's car and leaves a corpse in the trunk. That's not a bad analogy for the GOP's current situation.

And what did Baker say about Mr. Hastert? He said that people are making Denny Hastert a "sacrificial lamb." He - along with the President's father and other members of the Republican crime family - are circling the wagons around the high school coach turned real estate investment genius. They live by the traditional Mafia oath of mutual protection above all else:

"Io voglio entrare in questa organizzazione per proteggere la mia famiglia e per proteggere I miei amici."

That means "I want to enter into this organization to protect my family and to protect all my friends."

You can see the code in action. The GOP leadership protected the child molester as long as they could. Now they're protecting the guy who protected the child molester. Their venality knows no end. It's like one of those Russian dolls. Open up a bad deed and there's always another one inside.

Here's a word to Mr. Baker: Hastert's no "sacrificial lamb." The "sacrificial lambs" are those kids your Party didn't mind seeing victimized over and over so you could win elections. And you haven't had the decency to stop your media minions from slandering them, ridiculing them, and invading their privacy. Denny's not a "lamb" at all. He's just another member of your ravenous pack of wolves.

Shame on him. Shame on all of you. Go home and grow some ethics, Jim.

******
As Mr. Wolfe says in Pulp Fiction: "If I was informed correctly, the clock is ticking ..."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-esk...h_b_31136.html