sexuality and gender - new categories

[skirtrustler]

The hypocrisy of it (Nashville statement): "It's called the Nashville Statement and the national coalition says it's their response to an increasingly post-Christian, Western culture that thinks it can change God's design for humans."

I do so love religious dogma and statements as their logic is so often circular (it is wrong because ... it is ... errr ... wrong).

If God created heaven and earth, and Darwin is wrong as these people assert; then God's design includes LGBTIQ etc ... so it is God's design. However, 'we as a load of intolerant bigots cannot cope with this and want to clarify where God's design is wrong'.

*vomit*

[Ponyboy]

Lester316, No one is being forced into a category. We define ourselves. Secondly gay people are not picked on because they are a 'category'. They are picked on by bigots who think they are morally superior and dont like difference.

Gay people actually have a lot of categories for themselves eg twinks, bears, rice-queens, etc.

Lets just have some fun Lester!

[marcome]

One topic that pops up again and again on this forum is people trying to define their sexuality and gender. I personally dont go for 'categories' because things are fluid, but then I started thinking - maybe we need to create a few new categories. So here goes:

1. Still exploring - the first category is self explanatory
2. Straight
3. Straight/ Tran fan - a person who prefers GGs but also likes the occassional Tgirl
4. Tran fan - someone who loves my beautiful Tgirl sisters.
5. Bi-curious
6. Bi
7. Gay
8. Proto Tran - someone with female essence, starting to take physical features of a woman but hasnt yet transitioned - androgynous. Might be very beautiful.
9. Tgirl - my beautiful sisters!!
10. Mife - someone with essence of female, life has characteristics of female not male, but has not transitioned due to life complications. May live by self, but if in a relationship takes role of wife.

Have I covered all options?

I love the eighth category

[KelliBlueEyes]

One topic that pops up again and again on this forum is people trying to define their sexuality and gender. I personally dont go for 'categories' because things are fluid, but then I started thinking - maybe we need to create a few new categories. So here goes:

1. Still exploring - the first category is self explanatory
2. Straight
3. Straight/ Tran fan - a person who prefers GGs but also likes the occassional Tgirl
4. Tran fan - someone who loves my beautiful Tgirl sisters.
5. Bi-curious
6. Bi
7. Gay
8. Proto Tran - someone with female essence, starting to take physical features of a woman but hasnt yet transitioned - androgynous. Might be very beautiful.
9. Tgirl - my beautiful sisters!!
10. Mife - someone with essence of female, life has characteristics of female not male, but has not transitioned due to life complications. May live by self, but if in a relationship takes role of wife.

Have I covered all options?

No trans men or trans masculines?

[seth123]

Ponyboy..............Have I covered all options?

"Nomosexuals" https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...erm=nomosexual
Not so obvious but I've met quite a few over the years. Business associates, travel partners, no hidden agendas, lunch is just lunch, dinner is just dinner.......

[alcoolsrimbood]

where is the "bitch please.." category????

[Lester316]

Lester316, No one is being forced into a category. We define ourselves. Secondly gay people are not picked on because they are a 'category'. They are picked on by bigots who think they are morally superior and dont like difference.

Gay people actually have a lot of categories for themselves eg twinks, bears, rice-queens, etc.

Lets just have some fun Lester!

Sadly however people chose to define themselves there will always be a bigot (or group of them) rushing to label them in some negative ways. Your original post said you don't go for categories as things are fluid but then you decided to make a list - seems a bit redundant to me.

My point has never been that people choosing a label for themselves is a bad thing - it's their choice after all - and I'm well aware that there are numerous ways gay people (and others) choose to define their sexual preferences, body type or character.

Choice is a wonderful thing. It's just there are a lot of nasty folk out there who want to take that choice away and in a time where hopefully binary stereotypes are being slowly broken down, gender and sexuality is becoming more fluid, and where young people can discover who they are with hopefully less pressure I don't think creating more labels for the bigots to attach negative connotations to is a particularly good thing.

[Ponyboy]

[QUOTE=marcome;1834894]I love the eighth category

I do too!! That androgynous look can be so beautiful, but often they dont know how beautiful they are. I regret not telling someone.

[Ponyboy]

No trans men or trans masculines?

Yes, You are right!!

[Ponyboy]

"Nomosexuals" https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...erm=nomosexual
Not so obvious but I've met quite a few over the years. Business associates, travel partners, no hidden agendas, lunch is just lunch, dinner is just dinner.......

Good point, I suppose its hard to imagine someone without a sex drive. I always assume they are getting it off some way we dont know about, but i am probably wrong.