Originally Posted by seanchai
Ho-hum - try and make a pertinent point and Spidy slips into his tights and his 7 yr old intelligence.
Number 1: Adam Thompson - fucking an animal is wrong but can an animal fuck someone? Does it have more of an option then.
Number 2: Abusing an animal is wrong. Is it more wrong to have sex with an animal than to cut off it's tail, ears or whatever to make it more aesthetically pleasing. I'd balance that out to about the same.
Number 3: Spidy dumbass (and AT) - your morals are created. They may not be right or wrong but judged by the society we live in. You think having sex with a frog is morally objectionable but you're attraction to TS's (homosexuality to many) may just be as objectionable, if not more, to others.
Just for the record apart from the occassional sheep (or wilderbeest on holidays) animal sex does nothing for me. I don't particularly think it's got it's place on the video shelves but if people want this type of porn, if it's made by non-abusing people/animals and these people seek it out, then who are we to ban it?
It's not pedophilia, it's not porn which is going to incite rape, violence or murder, there's a lot more to get excited about and try to stop than this. You guys may as well join the Christian majority and help them ban this site also.
seanchai