Bachmann is truly ignorant and everyone but you knows it. [] Santorum, Bachmann, Perry, Paul, Gingrich and Mitt are all goofballs. Tell me, without lying, that you don't know that.
Printable View
Bachmann is truly ignorant and everyone but you knows it. [] Santorum, Bachmann, Perry, Paul, Gingrich and Mitt are all goofballs. Tell me, without lying, that you don't know that.
As with the Cain 'moment' on Libya, I think it exposes the weakness of the team not just the person -although Bachmann isn't going to get the nomination, when we look at these Presidential candidates, we should also be looking at the teams behind them, as they seem for the most part to become the White House staff and have an input on policy. If a news story grabs the headlines, surely someone on the team should have a response to any potential question -the attack on the British embassy in Iran, Hillary Clinton meeting the military leader of Burma/Myanmar and Daw Aung Sang suu Kyi; the fate of the Euro; why is there no snow in Switzerland? and so on. Or could it be that the Bachmann team knows what the future holds and can't be bothered?
It's a total freakshow. Never seen anything like this before. I mean, maybe they should try and coax John McCain into running again. At least he has the war hero credentials. Does Bachmann, Newt, Santorum, Mitt? Absolutely not. Actually, why didn't Mitt serve in Vietnam? He's the right age. 64. What about Newt? Why didn't he serve in Vietnam???
At least John McCain and John Kerry did.
I mean, this should be a crucial issue: WHY DIDN'T NEWT AND MITT SERVE IN VIETNAM???????
TOO FUNNY:
SAM KINISON IN BACK TO SCHOOL - YouTube
Didn't you just have a pissy fit on another thread about presumption ? And here you are presuming you know what "everyone" else knows. Here's what I think....I think you're insane. Why you ask.....3 polls out last week show Mitt beating Obama by 2 points, and Gingrich trailing 2. So...if they're goofballs as you suggest....what does that make your guy? And that's not a rhetorical question.
Do you say these things because you believe them, or because you can't believe anyone else could ever have a different opinion than you?
Or is all this to creepy for you?
Where did I fucking suggest they're all goofballs??? Show me! I said they ARE all goofballs. Oh and I made no presumptions (of the personal sort referred to in http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/sho...&postcount=956 ). I asked Faldur to tell me he didn't know that they were all goofballs. He declined to respond.
Come to think of it, it is a bit creepy of you to be responding to a remark I made to Faldur one week ago. It's as if you went looking for a post where I might have been presumptive, failed to find one but thought this one was close enough to remark upon, all because you're still upset with something I wrote this morning in the general forum. Yeah...that's creepy. It's something a real loser might find himself doing.
Don't be so subtle, Trish. It's confusing.
...and I draw no conclusion from your non-response. There must be hundreds of comments, invitations and questions that people post and others choose (often wisely) to pass over.