Now there's a shocker...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11263.html
Printable View
Now there's a shocker...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11263.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kFrFIFizkU
"YES WE CAN"?.... sure buddy. What a fucking joke and globalist corporate whore he REALLY is.
The clip you link doesn't sufficiently identify which troop involvement is being discussed or when the conversation took place. Many people, for example, agree that we still have a lot of legitimate work to do in Afghanistan in the way of building Schools, hospitals and infrastructure. Can you clarify whether the question being addressed concerned Iraq or Afghanistan?
Please Trish. You don't understand the true function of our occupations/invasions, do you? I will not even honor your semantically driven question with a response, other than say, Does it even matter, when or what particular soldiers or invasion he is speaking of? Get my drift???????????????????
The US/UK has lost the strategic reason for the Afghanistan occupation. In the very near future India will sign a pact with Iran for delivery of natural gas thus rendering irrelevant the alternative pipeline route from Tajikistan across Afghanistan. I will post the link when I can find it.
It was a polite request to answer a simple question. Semantics is the connection between words and their meaning. Sorry my question was semantically driven. I thought you were making a point with some logic or reason behind it. Obviously not.
Now there's another shocker.... :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by trish
Still can't get over the fact that your creepy savior of the lunatic fringe Ron Paul was soundly defeated and also rightfully branded as an irrelevant crackpot, huh?Quote:
Originally Posted by El Nino
Much like yourself...