Bottoms: Width versus length?
My past few irl bottoms have complained about having difficulty taking my width. Seems most people seem to train their asses for length, not width. So my question for the bottoms here: do you prefer a long cock or a wide cock?
Please only answer if you've actually taken a cock.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
i enjoy the feeling of being penetrated. i really don't have a preference for how deep it goes so i guess i do prefer girth over length. But that said, its not as if I prefer just being widened and staying gaped...its about the movement in and out, preferably full withdrawl and re-insertion. that really does it for me.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
I can understand why someone might complain about your girth Wendy. You do have a very thick cock. Because I have a tight butt hole I definitely prefer a thinner cock.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
i don't get the concept of anal training either. what are you training for...most people don't have 14" dicks with 10" circumference. i've never "trained" i just accept anal entry with whatever my partner is working it.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rbiller
I can understand why someone might complain about your girth Wendy. You do have a very thick cock. Because I have a tight butt hole I definitely prefer a thinner cock.
ditto
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
I prefer moderate length and girth....Girthy cocks can be a bit harder to take, but im always up for a challenge.
With me its all about chemistry, I love the feeling of a guy/girl climbing my back and penetrating me until he or she is satisfied with pleasure.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RallyCola
i don't get the concept of anal training either. what are you training for...most people don't have 14" dicks with 10" circumference. i've never "trained" i just accept anal entry with whatever my partner is working it.
It's been a real problem for me in my personal life... everyone thinks they can handle it until I try to get in there. It's frustrating for me when I want to get in to not be able to get in because they aren't stretched enough to take me. It's part of why I don't top on film... it takes forever for me to actually get in someone.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
Love being topped , prefer length to too much girth? 9in was about the longest and it was thick too...... girl had wonderful technique , but I felt I couldn't of taken any bigger tbh. (Altho I'd love to be with her right now!) Sometimes a little less is more! :)
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wendy Summers
It's been a real problem for me in my personal life... everyone thinks they can handle it until I try to get in there. It's frustrating for me when I want to get in to not be able to get in because they aren't stretched enough to take me. It's part of why I don't top on film... it takes forever for me to actually get in someone.
i never really knew this was a problem. if a person is resistant to allowing penetration and forcibly tightening, that's one thing. in both giving and receiving, to me its just about lubing and pushing in. you just haven't found the right ass to plow yet. Super Pooper (westangelino) might be the right dude for you.
Re: Bottoms: Width versus length?
The first cock I took was from an escort, about average in length (6 inches) but enormously thick. I wasn't ready for that but stuck it out until I adjusted. Believe me, it was tough as hell at first.
Now, on my own time when messing about, I have dildos/vibrators of various thicknesses and work my way up to the thickest (girth being 6 1/2 inches around). Now, I think I'd be ready to handle the likes of one Wendy Summers. ;)