I think it's an interesting touch. As long as they don't look like a monkey.
Vala,
Printable View
I think it's an interesting touch. As long as they don't look like a monkey.
Vala,
yuck......bet she doesn't shave the under arms either
with an ass like hers, I could ignore a little hair..Quote:
Originally Posted by vamxcore
There are many places a woman should be hair less-
the face, the chest, the back, the stomach..
that would also include THE LEGS, THE ASS, THE UNDERARMS, AND YES-AT LEAST A CLEAN BIKINI LINE.
Other than that is plain vile and disgusting
Yeah, I'm hairless all over too (except the head of course!) but it's interesting to see, at least for me.
Vala,
but you gotta admit that a small amount of blonde hair in the ass crack is kinda sexy. well to me at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by AllanahStarrNYC
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :D
Dont mind if its little bit hairy just not overly much i prfer it very fine like hair
Co signed with THE REALLY BIG PEN.Quote:
Originally Posted by AllanahStarrNYC
I'll add to that list that while the crotch may indeed have hair, it should be somewhat in control. But shaved smooth is still a gabillion times sexier.
my legs are hairy. I blame it on my northern ancestors.
Hairy minge, yes, as long as it's within the bikini line--actually I don't much care for shaved gg minge, it gives you a fucking awful friction burn unless she shaves every day or so, yeah, right....I don't mind a little bit of fine armpit hair, it's kinda sexy, as long as she doesn't have dreadlocks there or anything.... (It's Europe here) And some girls have blonde body hair so fine you can't see it anyway....But hairy legs are a definite no-no-no-no. Not EVER.