How safe is oral without protection??

[jasonX]

I notice pretty much all escorts offer oral without protection, how safe is this?? and how come everyone offers it without?

Maybe I am very naive but what are the risks of me performing oral on an escort without??

Quick answers please!

[flabbybody]

google.com
quick enough?

[Ts RedVeX]

It's very safe:D Besides, if you wish, you can probably always wear a condom...

[blueeyeboy]

I dunno, suck it and see?

[jasonX]

how come so many ts escorts offer oral without ?

[dreamon]

how come so many ts escorts offer oral without ?

Because it feels better

[malmonger]

If you're asking only about HIV, then the answer is safe enough. Last time I checked, there had be ZERO proven cases of HIV transmission through BBBJ

But if you want to know about other sexually transmitted diseases, then the answer is very different. Yes, you can get herpes from a BBBJ. And other things.

As the previous poster said, google is your friend. But beware there's a lot of scare-mongering information out there. I don't know if it's still up there, but CL used to have a nice link to a San Francisco health clinic, and their information was factual and non-judgemental.

[Ts RedVeX]

Why has nobody thought of making condoms that would ensure safe kissing?

[Vladimir Putin]

According to the Federal Centers for Disease Control, the chances of contracting HIV by giving unprotected oral sex is small provided that your partner doesn't cum in your mouth, but keep in mind that a small risk is not the same as no risk. There is some debate over whether you can be infected by pre-cum.

Your chances of getting HIV increase greatly if your partner cums in your mouth. They also increase somewhat if you notice cuts or sores on the penis of if you have bleeding gums.

[flabbybody]

how come so many ts escorts offer oral without ?

it's about making you cum and getting rid of you as quickly as possible
Money will trump safety every time

[syla]

Nah, dude. Not worth it. Safe from HIV..but not from herpes and gonorrhea, genital warts and all that shit. I didn't know until I watched this other sex health doccie on Monday. F*ck that, I am now only covering it up one way. They showed the dude's penis and said:He met a girl the other night and he got what? Oral! But not only did he get oral sex, he also got herpes. And its incurable! No ways! !

[youngblood61]

According to the Federal Centers for Disease Control, the chances of contracting HIV by giving unprotected oral sex is small provided that your partner doesn't cum in your mouth, but keep in mind that a small risk is not the same as no risk. There is some debate over whether you can be infected by pre-cum.

Your chances of getting HIV increase greatly if your partner cums in your mouth. They also increase somewhat if you notice cuts or sores on the penis of if you have bleeding gums.Lets face it, most will cum in the mouth. Which to me is very risky.

[natina]

BBBJ,ITS NOT SAFE

but when your tipsy its risky

you don't know what your facing


http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=90441&page=7

reckless sexual behavior among young white gays

A new study out of Belgium has found that reckless sexual behavior among young white gay men is contributing the the spread of HIV in the UK and Europe. The study out of Ghent University looked at the genetic makeup of the HIV virus in more than 500 newly-diagnosed HIV-positive patients between 2001 and 2009 and found a majority of the group was young, white, male, and gay.

What is wrong with these young white gay males?

For starters, I've been out for almost 10 years and have a considerable number of gay friends across the country, but I don't know a single person who is HIV-positive. It makes the risk seem a lot less real, even reading and reporting on stories like this one every day.

Secondly, those of us born in the '80s and '90s are still young enough to think we're invincible

And safe sex isn't sexy. It takes time, ruins the moment, costs money. They don't use condoms in the movies or on TV, and wrapping it up destroys the moment, especially with someone new. Just like young girls who end up pregnant after having unsafe sex, sometimes you like a guy and he doesn't want to use a condom, or he doesn't have one, and you don't have the strength to put it off. Or maybe you want it as bad as he does. It's no excuse, but it's common.

Not to mention we're generally uneducated. Gays who are active in the community have the benefit of constant AIDS walks and posters telling us to be safe and get tested, but what about people who are closeted, on the down low, or just not active in a gay scene?

When I was growing up my school taught abstinence, not safe sex. The first time I saw a condom when I was a teen I got so nervous I wasn't able to perform. That was years ago and now I use one every time, but it was scary because no one had ever taught me what it was, what it meant, or even what it looked like.

I got my first HIV test at my university's student health center. They drew blood and it took four days to get the results. I just got an HIV test last week, and I had no idea how fast and easy it was. It wasn't awkward, it didn't hurt because it was the swab, and it took less than an hour for the mini counseling session and the results. It was extremely reassuring.


http://www.oprah.com/health/New-Faces-of-HIV-and-AIDS/print/1

These five women sharing the Oprah Show stage have a lot in common. They live in suburban America. They are mothers with successful careers. They also, unknowingly, shared a partner. Each woman, some of whom are in disguise, dated and slept with Philippe Padieu, a man they describe as handsome and charismatic. Unfortunately, he turned out to be very different from the man he claimed to be.

Diane broke up with Philippe when she discovered he was cheating. A few days later, she went to the gynecologist for a routine exam. Her doctor called within days to say that her pap smear showed precancerous cells due to a sexually transmitted disease. Knowing that he had cheated, Diane decided to let the other women know that they too might have an STD. As she went back through his phone records, Diane realized the cheating had been worse than she thought. "He was dating nine other women at the time he was dating me," she says.

One of the women Diane called was Susan. "We compared notes, and some of the time that she'd been seeing him, I had been seeing him," Susan says. "Then she said, 'I have an STD, and I am certain that Philippe gave this to me.'"

After talking to Diane, Susan went to her doctor and got news even worse than she had feared. "I received a phone call after my testing from my doctor and she said, 'You have HIV,'" Susan says.

The next time Diane and Susan spoke, Susan broke the news. "I got a test two days later," Diane says. "My ob-gyn called me and said, 'You're HIV positive.'"




Unchecked superbugs could kill 10 million a year, cost $100 trillion



Drug-resistant superbugs could kill an extra 10 million people a year and cost up to $100 trillion by 2050 if their rampant global spread is not halted, according to a British government-commissioned review.
Such infections already kill hundreds of thousands of people a year and the trend is growing, the review said, adding: "The importance of effective antimicrobial drugs cannot be overplayed."
Former Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O'Neill, who led the work, noted that in Europe and the United States alone around 50,000 people currently die each year from infections caused by superbug forms of bacteria such as E.coli.
"Unless something is done by 2050, that number could become 10 million people losing their lives each year from then onwards," he told a briefing in London.
Antimicrobials are a class of drugs that includes antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics and antifungals.
The review of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is based on analysis by two sets of researchers, RAND and KPMG, estimating the future impact of AMR under different scenarios for six common infections -- three bacterial infections, plus malaria, HIV and tuberculosis.
But it excludes indirect effects of growing drug resistance which could "cast medicine back to the dark ages", the review said, by making routine procedures more dangerous.
The problem posed by infections developing resistance to such drugs has been a feature of medicine since Alexander Fleming's discovery of the first antibiotic, penicillin, in Britain in 1928.
But it has worsened in recent years as multi-drug-resistant bugs have developed and drug companies have reduced investment in an unprofitable field.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/unchecked-superbugs-could-kill-10-million-a-year-cost-dollar100-trillion/ar-BBgD1He