PDA

View Full Version : why do some t-girl pornstars make so little scenes?



fuckstudent
08-05-2014, 09:05 PM
For example Danni Daniels or Natalia Coxxx if i name just two from american scene.

They make so little scenes (in last years), compare to regular porn girls on the straight scene. Yes, i know the scene is smaller, but still i would expect at least 1 scene 1-3 months. It can also not be the savety reason. Is there really so little work for them?

crystalsopen
08-05-2014, 09:19 PM
For example Danni Daniels or Natalia Coxxx if i name just two from american scene.

They make so little scenes (in last years), compare to regular porn girls on the straight scene. Yes, i know the scene is smaller, but still i would expect at least 1 scene 1-3 months. It can also not be the savety reason. Is there really so little work for them?
The biggest problem facing the industry is piracy. There are also practical considerations for any model (travel time, expenses, differing creative ideas and what makes financial sense). Cam shows and/or escorting may make more sense for them. I don't know them personally so I cannot say. Speaking as someone who has decided to never do professionally produced porn again. (http://crystalsopen.tumblr.com/post/93895201009/i-will-not-shoot-any-more-porn-ever) Also, porn also doesn't pay like most fans think. As Steven explained here. (http://grooby.com/seanchai/steven/model-ts-website-real-facts.html) I can tell you from my limited experience, what Steven says is true.

Teydyn
08-06-2014, 12:42 AM
Why should they do more porn? They both are already high profile and if they escort they can easily make more in a day then doing one shot...

Nikka
08-06-2014, 12:49 AM
Why should they do more porn? They both are already high profile and if they escort they can easily make more in a day then doing one shot...

wich is a shame, tranny pornstars shud be like penelope cruz when she shoot spanish art movies for the sake of the art

crystalsopen
08-06-2014, 01:58 AM
wich is a shame, tranny pornstars shud be like penelope cruz when she shoot spanish art movies for the sake of the art

She is worth about $55 million US dollars (http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/celebritymoney/article-2006831/How-rich-Pen-lope-Cruz.html), so yeah she does stuff just for art or because she wants to now. So would almost anyone. Penelope Cruz got $2 million (usd) just to shoot Vanilla Sky (2001) even before she was really famous. In this world where girls doing hardcore scenes are paid less than 1/1000th of that (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/11/23/the-adult-industry-doesn-t-pay-as-much-as-you-think.html), your comparison seems completely unfair.

Sam69
08-06-2014, 03:52 AM
I would imagine that TS porn girls have the same issues that straight porn girls have, including with their family not wanting them to be out there all over the place fucking on the internet. So if they can make substantial money escorting, have a personal life, have more flexibility time-wise as compared to meeting the schedule of the porn producers, have less friction with their family and generally having an easier life, why go through the hassle? That's the way I figure it works, anyway. I would certainly love to see Melzinha Bonekinha do more than the handful of scenes she has done. One would think that porn producers would be loving to shoot her more in different scenarios. I wouldn't be surprised if her lack of further porn activity were entirely her decision.

Deimos
08-06-2014, 05:02 AM
Just be happy these girls are providing you with content. They could just as easily retire and do other things for a career.

RallyCola
08-06-2014, 05:53 AM
a model's willingness to shoot porn has very little to do with her ability to shoot porn.
if she is unwilling...then insert any number of reasons, but the point is, she could be extremely eager to get in front of a camera but the market may not dictate that she will be received well. additionally, there are reasons that some girls do not get calls from producers, even if they are your particular favorites. we'v heard stories about some models being difficult to work with, some having extraordinary fees, others having exclusive contracts, etc...there is more to modeling than just "wanting to."

The other thing that i would point to is that for the larger producers of porn, it would appear that "novelty" and "variety" are as important, if not more so, than "longevity" when hiring models. for example, natalia coxx could be waiting by the phone for Jay Sin or Steven to call for a shoot but perhaps they won't because there are newer girls eager to work and a producer might want to capitalize on what's hot and the moment. i am not saying that producers don't like to reshoot, but in an effort to increase customer bases and also find the next it girl, i do believe that new debuts are valued more than reshoots in some cases.

porn popularity, that is, the attitudes and attentiveness of porn fans, are quite fickle. so where you have a niche market with a smaller fan base than ggirl porn, and a small number of producers setting the market, its no wonder why trends shift as often as they do. in fact, i would say that the clamor for the next it girl actually drives previous stars to the background on purpose because each next it girl ends up saturating the market within months of her debut at the expense of models who came before her. it is simply the nature of the beast, especially when you consider, as has been explained many times, that porn is not the most lucrative venture in the sex industry for a transwoman to engage in.

parts25
08-06-2014, 07:53 AM
Everyone is always looking for the latest and greatest and the next big thing. Porn fans are very fickle and move very fast these days due to the internet. New performers can get overexposed quickly and then it's onto the next one, etc. I would think they would have to have something to fall back on or supplement with escorting, webcam, skype, chat, etc. Either way it's not something they can do forever.