Interesting Forums Stats

[Ecstatic]

There are 10 topics on HA with over 1 million views. I find it interesting how these break down by topic, though I'm not entirely sure what, if any, conclusions to draw from these data.

Thread............................................ .................Views
Amateur sissy stuff...ts/tv/cd`s............................9,971,555
Shemale Cartoons.......................................... .....7,713,871
bulges and "filled" underwear.................................2,690,52 0
TV/non-pro/amateur/Sissy - Stuff..........................1,543,798
MISS BLACK HUNG ANGEL POST A PIC HERE..............1,465,107
MONSTER COCKS (BEST OF)..................................1,296,676
Street Action - Thailand.......................................1,2 50,291
The hottest thing is girls out in public......................1,246,196
Fem Boy Thread finely done right!!!.........................1,197,459
Can everyone post their retro pics..........................1,140,162
TOTAL............................................. ................29,515,635

I don't know what percentage of HA's total views this represents, but the most-viewed thread is 1/3 of the top ten threads total views. Here's a topical breakdown into six categories:

Amateur sissy/tv/cd/fem boy......12,712,812
Cartoons..................................7,713,87 1
Big Cocks/Bulges........................3,987,196
Out in Public/Street....................2,496,487
Miss Black HA............................1,465,107
Retro Pics.................................1,140,162

Huge emphasis on sissy/tv/cd/etc., way over big cocks. Is this simply because there are far more distinct threads on big cocks? Or indicative of HA bias?

OK, enough time wasting, back to work now.

[MrsKellyPierce]

That most don't care as long as you have a big cock?

[Rusty Eldora]

I think the primary thought is that the top 10 are running threads that have been around for a long time. The top one is going on 6 years (2007). The amateur threads noted have collected nearly all of the am posts, I don't recall a lot of posts outside of these threads.

If you look at the Black threads on HA I would guess that there are nearly 20 that have had posts in the last year. Same with Monsters, there are a lot of threads around that one with different titles.

If you are trying to estimate what proportions the HA member base reside, it doesn't fit well with the views.

[francisfkudrow]

Amateur sissy/tv/cd/fem boy......12,712,812
Cartoons..................................7,713,87 1
Big Cocks/Bulges........................3,987,196
Out in Public/Street....................2,496,487
Miss Black HA............................1,465,107
Retro Pics.................................1,140,162



As resident Excel specialist, I turned this data into a graph...

[MrsKellyPierce]

I am sorry I had to die laughing at these stats...when hungangel men act so homophobic.

[EvaCassini]

:dead-1:

[Prospero]

Depressing it suggests most of the people here are essentially gay and more interested in boys than transsexuals

[EvaCassini]

Curious what this means for we girls... lmao

[NYBURBS]

:dead-1:

Bob Ross and hot women, an instant win lol


I am sorry I had to die laughing at these stats...when hungangel men act so homophobic.

Ya that's a good point, and some of the more vocally "homophobic" are really undercover man sluts, but that's been rehashed enough that I'll leave it at that.

Having been around this site for years now, on and off, I have noticed that there are users that log in just to go to some of those popular threads, likely finding them on a google search, and others that tend to login to post in whatever is the hot topic of the day. The two groups rarely mix.

[Prospero]

the more boyish the better i guess eva as far as many men here are concerned :-(

[EvaCassini]

Bob Ross and hot women, an instant win lol

Thanks sweetie!


the more boyish the better i guess eva as far as many men here are concerned :-(

Perhaps we should start shooting scenes with big Gandalf beards, acne, and binding our breasts..... LMAO

(Wondering if one would jack off to Gandalf in drag) :p

[iagodelgado]

I think you should shrink the retro pics viewings. I'm heavily into that and have lost my data 3 or 4 times, twice this year alone, so I reckon I must have clocked up around 100,000 views!

PS. If you like retro, it is building up nicely at http://www.hungdevils.com/index.php?/topic/18134-the-transsexual-erotica-archive-of-magazines-and-films-we-need-your-help/

[MrsKellyPierce]

So straight men of hungangels its your duty to change the stats lol

I believe in you!

[bluesoul]

Depressing it suggests most of the people here are essentially gay and more interested in boys than transsexuals

why is it depressing? i don't think there is anything wrong with being gay. besides, you've even complimented members on this forum that have lusted for femboys

[bluesoul]

So straight men of hungangels its your duty to change the stats lol

I believe in you!

when that was first attempted- you didn't seem to see a point to it remember (http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showpost.php?p=337199&postcount=6)?

[alyssaluxor]

Like I always told you here its true

Most TS admirer/chasers will suck any cock even if its a boy as long as you put a wig on it.

The most important thing for them is the cock thats it ;)

Now thats the evidence!

[MrsKellyPierce]

when that was first attempted- you didn't seem to see a point to it remember (http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showpost.php?p=337199&postcount=6)?
I don't think you take sarcasm well :)

[dderek123]

Nothing wrong with being gay.

The ultra-homophobes who are secretly gay are bad news though. Just relax and be yourself man.

[bluesoul]

I don't think you take sarcasm well :)

you're right. the last time it happened, i still didn't get it (http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?p=1231631)

[MrsKellyPierce]

The war is coming soon :)

Happy PRIDE WEEKEND!!

BE PROUD TO LOVE

[EvaCassini]

Dick love for everyone! :D

[GroobySteven]

It doesn't mean anything (although the responses from some of the girls is pretty pathetic and unnecessarily confrontational). What it means is one thread gets viewed more than an other not by more people but by the same returning people.
So a thread on a topic about amateur/sissy stuff gets a lot of people effectively subscribing to it as it keeps most of that content in one place - and returning to it - while multiple threads on XYZ girl, or Hot ABC's don't attract as much.

There is a lot of interest in amateur girls and the whole sort of self-posted pics (in mainstream and TS), as they're often hotter than pro-content and many girls there may end up becoming more pro-models, just as some of the girls posting in this thread started out as more "amateur" content.

[Jericho]

(Wondering if one would jack off to Gandalf in drag) :p


One might...If he had big tits! :shrug
:hide-1:

[EvaCassini]

It doesn't mean anything (although the responses from some of the girls is pretty pathetic and unnecessarily confrontational). What it means is one thread gets viewed more than an other not by more people but by the same returning people.
So a thread on a topic about amateur/sissy stuff gets a lot of people effectively subscribing to it as it keeps most of that content in one place - and returning to it - while multiple threads on XYZ girl, or Hot ABC's don't attract as much.

There is a lot of interest in amateur girls and the whole sort of self-posted pics (in mainstream and TS), as they're often hotter than pro-content and many girls there may end up becoming more pro-models, just as some of the girls posting in this thread started out as more "amateur" content.

;) Im not upset at it, just thought it was funny.



One might...If he had big tits! :shrug
:hide-1:

Damn it.....ok my next set is me in the Gandalf costume....I'll use my Staff! lol
Who wants to see my "white council" blow up? LMAO

[Jamie French]

Can't be true, I'd be a bigger name if that were the case.


the more boyish the better i guess eva as far as many men here are concerned :-(

[Idt20082008"]

I just saw something I never thought I would on HA - a pie chart lol

[dderek123]

Damn it.....ok my next set is me in the Gandalf costume....I'll use my Staff! lol
Who wants to see my "white council" blow up? LMAO

I'd just focus on the wizard sleeve and have a quick wank.

http://i.imgur.com/P1rm3wa.png

[EvaCassini]

I dont know why, but I do like pie charts lol

[dderek123]

I dont know why, but I do like pie charts lol

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/masturbation-graph.png

[GroobySteven]

http://weknowmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/masturbation-graph.png

That's pretty good - finding the right scene or shoot at the right time is key!

[EvaCassini]

Thats the best pie chart I have ever seen! LMAO Love it.

[thx1138]

where are all the "Am I gay?" threads?

[trish]

Just want to make two small points.

The Captures thread in the Stories forum has over 1.16 million views which bumps the Retro pics from the top ten (unless you contrain the analysis to the General forum, which is perfectly fine).

A few years ago when HA went from the Pink format to the current format a number of long continuing threads had view counts that were re-initialized.

[f-finger]

The first two regarding views are simply updated regurarly, because there is much material around. Cartoons and Amatuer pix are aplenty. The Black thread for instance is almost single-handedly pushed into the top ten by obsessive bumping by user "natina".

It's easy to get a thread to have many views, just be obsessive enough to bump it every day or every second day into page one.

[nysprod]

There are 10 topics on HA with over 1 million views. I find it interesting how these break down by topic, though I'm not entirely sure what, if any, conclusions to draw from these data.

Thread............................................ .................Views
Amateur sissy stuff...ts/tv/cd`s............................9,971,555
Shemale Cartoons.......................................... .....7,713,871
bulges and "filled" underwear.................................2,690,52 0
TV/non-pro/amateur/Sissy - Stuff..........................1,543,798
MISS BLACK HUNG ANGEL POST A PIC HERE..............1,465,107
MONSTER COCKS (BEST OF)..................................1,296,676
Street Action - Thailand.......................................1,2 50,291
The hottest thing is girls out in public......................1,246,196
Fem Boy Thread finely done right!!!.........................1,197,459
Can everyone post their retro pics..........................1,140,162
TOTAL............................................. ................29,515,635

I don't know what percentage of HA's total views this represents, but the most-viewed thread is 1/3 of the top ten threads total views. Here's a topical breakdown into six categories:

Amateur sissy/tv/cd/fem boy......12,712,812
Cartoons..................................7,713,87 1
Big Cocks/Bulges........................3,987,196
Out in Public/Street....................2,496,487
Miss Black HA............................1,465,107
Retro Pics.................................1,140,162

Huge emphasis on sissy/tv/cd/etc., way over big cocks. Is this simply because there are far more distinct threads on big cocks? Or indicative of HA bias?

OK, enough time wasting, back to work now.

This is why I've said in the past it's surprising that Grooby doesn't have:

1. An amateur sissy/femboy/etc. site...Brielle Bop-type models and a lot of Dong's "girls" would fit perfectly into this genre. Boys turned out as fem girls is hot.

2. A site that uses famous TS porn stars in cartoon form and then puts them in all kinds of scenarios. Note to producers: never have worry about drugged out/limp/bitchy TS models again!

3. Why TGirls under any circumstances tuck...there is no "tucked" thread which has garnered any interest...chasers want BULGES. Escorts who post their pics on BP/EROS/Etc, are you listening?

[Dino Velvet]

3. Why TGirls under any circumstances tuck...there is no "tucked" thread which has garnered any interest...chasers want BULGES. Escorts who post their pics on BP/EROS/Etc, are you listening?

I tried a thread based around that knowing how limited the interest would be. Still hopeful but probably more an optimist than a realist.

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=79064

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/attachment.php?attachmentid=594255&stc=1&d=1372205594

[nysprod]

I just registered:

Femboyamateurs.com and Amateurfemboys.com if anyone's interested.

I also own reallifeshemales.com and shemalesinreallife.com

[hapboy]

Whilst this is all very interesting I think you can interpret statistics in so many different ways that it becomes meaningless . It could just be that the other topics have more treads and therefore members have a greater choice to view from.

[Prospero]

why is it depressing? i don't think there is anything wrong with being gay. besides, you've even complimented members on this forum that have lusted for femboys


No nothing wrong with being gay. But this is a forum essentially about transsexuals.

And who have I complimented that has lusted after femboys? I don't think so.

[youngblood61]

That's pretty good - finding the right scene or shoot at the right time is key!Yes indeed seanchai.

[nysprod]

No nothing wrong with being gay. But this is a forum essentially about transsexuals.



I thought so too when I first joined...imagine my confusion then at seeing how popular "Amateur Sissy/Femboy/Etc" was.

Nothing wrong with it, just saying.

[BellaBellucci]

Gay.

~BB~

[dderek123]

That's pretty good - finding the right scene or shoot at the right time is key!

Has anyone else masturbated once more because they felt they didn't watch the right model or scene?

Perhaps I've said too much!

[tommy001]

BB where have you been? Haven't said hello for ages! Hi BB

[Prospero]

Let me be clear about my attitude regarding being "gay". It is one of the eternal questions that arises here - usually from newbies. The "am I gay" issue because they like transexuals. My perspective on it is that being gay is 100 per cent fine. Being straight is 100 per cent fine and so is enjoying the look, company and sexuality of transgendered girls. And finding them attractive and interesting as people. For me they are women. Which is why I said i found it depressing that so many visitors here seem (and I am not sure i really understand the statistics being offered) to be at the 'gay" end of the spectrum in seeming to prefer to view pictures of what are,, at best, either transexuals who have scarcely started their transition or rather more accurately effeminate gay men. That's cool too. Nothing wrong with liking them. But as i said I would have expected them to be a somewhat minority interest on this forum. I'd expect their enthusiasts to congregate elsewhere - and be regulars on sites such as gaydar. But there we are. Hungangels is a broad church.

[MacShreach]

This is why I've said in the past it's surprising that Grooby doesn't have:

1. An amateur sissy/femboy/etc. site...Brielle Bop-type models and a lot of Dong's "girls" would fit perfectly into this genre. Boys turned out as fem girls is hot.

2. A site that uses famous TS porn stars in cartoon form and then puts them in all kinds of scenarios. Note to producers: never have worry about drugged out/limp/bitchy TS models again!

3. Why TGirls under any circumstances tuck...there is no "tucked" thread which has garnered any interest...chasers want BULGES. Escorts who post their pics on BP/EROS/Etc, are you listening?

Well gosh, I can't be a chaser then...thanks for clearing that up, SMH

[nysprod]

Well gosh, I can't be a chaser then...thanks for clearing that up, SMH

In their eyes, we all are. Sorry.

[BellaBellucci]

BB where have you been? Haven't said hello for ages! Hi BB

Helloez again! I've been around, pitching insightfully sarcastic comments here and there. :D

~BB~

[Stavros]

One reference to cartoons in five pages, they seem to be hugely popular. I don't get it, I see a cartoon and its as interesting as a paper bag, what's the fascination?

[EvaCassini]

I am one, who enjoys the "cartoon-ish" ones. In a cartoon, a girl can do anything.

Not saying I am a big fan of "tentacles"...but how would one be able to make "tentacle sex", in real life, "sexy"? A decent question, because...does the girl use stuffed plush tentacles, or dead squid/octopus tentacles, or fabricate rubber-ish ones lubed up?......gives me an idea lol

But this can be a standard question "if you will", for many a things taking place is "cartoon" TS porn, that are not so very easy to "accomplish" in real life to make look sexy.
:D

[Jamie French]

I like the cartoons as well... especially the 3D monster porn stuff, (petite fantasy girls, big hulking monsters)... gonna open up a whole new section of my website featuring original 3D cartoon content soon.


One reference to cartoons in five pages, they seem to be hugely popular. I don't get it, I see a cartoon and its as interesting as a paper bag, what's the fascination?

[Ecstatic]

I am sorry I had to die laughing at these stats...when hungangel men act so homophobic.

Yep, that's what I thought, Kelly! (And I've been here since 2004...hmm, what's that indicate?)

[Ecstatic]

where are all the "Am I gay?" threads?

Well I didn't attempt a statistical analysis of all threads on HA (now that would be interesting, but jeez, who has the time?). I just noticed some interesting factors in the top ten most viewed threads.

[Dino Velvet]

Let me be clear about my attitude regarding being "gay". It is one of the eternal questions that arises here - usually from newbies. The "am I gay" issue because they like transexuals. My perspective on it is that being gay is 100 per cent fine. Being straight is 100 per cent fine and so is enjoying the look, company and sexuality of transgendered girls. And finding them attractive and interesting as people. For me they are women. Which is why I said i found it depressing that so many visitors here seem (and I am not sure i really understand the statistics being offered) to be at the 'gay" end of the spectrum in seeming to prefer to view pictures of what are,, at best, either transexuals who have scarcely started their transition or rather more accurately effeminate gay men. That's cool too. Nothing wrong with liking them. But as i said I would have expected them to be a somewhat minority interest on this forum. I'd expect their enthusiasts to congregate elsewhere - and be regulars on sites such as gaydar. But there we are. Hungangels is a broad church.

Basically people arrive here in different ways. Some stomp in tracking through the mud and others back that ass up onto the board. Nothing wrong with being either, neither, or all three.

[Amy Gray]

Or indicative of HA bias?

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

The conclusions you appear to be drawing are flawed for the type of statistical analysis you're making. The most obvious issue is that you're examining total posts only while ignoring a number of other crucial factors. Here are some other points you'd have to account for.


Age of thread - If one thread is 8 years old and has 3 million posts while another is a month old and has a million posts... well that's not a valid comparison.

Performance throughout the thread's life - In the above example you might find that the three million post thread ALSO had a million posts in it's first month. You have to examine not just age but performance throughout it's life

What posters are represented by those threads - You might have one thread with four million posts coming from four posters while another thread has a hundred thousand posts by a hundred thousand posters. Factoring in who posted and how much each of them posted is kind of critical before you can infer anything.

The actual subject of the thread - For example, in your thailand streetwalker thread it appears that you assumed the thread was about streetwalking but couldn't it easily have been thai trans women? You might find that the title of the thread gives little indication as to the subject. Also, a thread about crossdressers might be consumed with off topic posts about peanutbutter and jelly sandwiches. You'll likely find that those threads actually have multiple topics all of which are unrelated to the OP.


Sorry, I know I'm taking it way too seriously but I could just see my statics professors throttling me if I didn't say anything. In short, the only thing you can infer from those threads is that hung angels has threads with a lot of posts... or possibly that I really like peanutbutter and jelly sandwiches.

[francisfkudrow]

Well I didn't attempt a statistical analysis of all threads on HA (now that would be interesting, but jeez, who has the time?). I just noticed some interesting factors in the top ten most viewed threads.

From what I can infer, while there are vast numbers of "am I gay" threads, no one of these threads can hope to make it into the views necessary to meet the threshold required for Ecstatic's study.

[Amy Gray]

From what I can infer, while there are vast numbers of "am I gay" threads, no one of these threads can hope to make it into the views necessary to meet the threshold required for Ecstatic's study.

*facepalms* I totally forgot to mention that. Frequency of the topic overall! There might (for argument sake) be 3 CD threads with a million votes each and ten million one post threads about guys asking if they're gay.

[Corran]

I always go straight to the pic of the day threads..:shrug

[nysprod]

He left out the "Shemales in Real Life" thread because it's on it's third iteration after the first two were deleted...together, they had millions of views.

[danthepoetman]

Helloez again! I've been around, pitching insightfully sarcastic comments here and there. :D

~BB~
Hmm? who are you exactly??

[danthepoetman]

Millions, millions! It god damn sound like the lottery!
Hey! I never liked anything but girls in my natural life (as they say, but can there be any other?). I've been with t-escorts and I had a couple of t-girls friends (not girlfriends, but friends). I had in particular a tlady friend as a neighbour. What she wanted from me was so exactly what any of my gf wanted! kill spiders, plug stereo, move furniture, noise at night, carry disgusting garbage, pick something from toilet (even clean water), etc., etc., etc. I couldn't care fucking less about cocks, I in fact really dislike all of them but my own (who's a prince, believe me, ladies), I never felt like sucking a girl (altough I licked, as I was analingussing, because I always lick the orifice I'm going to fuck -it's justice) and I never ever thought of myself as being gay.
Now, I am one of these guys who regularly frequent the femboy thread. I have discovered that some of these guys can really be feminine and delicate, and can really have the qualities of someone I want to fuck (sorry for the straight words, but I'm drunk). Some of these guys, have I discovered on HA, I could probably fuck (hard). Now, would I really? I don't know. I don't really know how my body would react. Some of these models who works as women, if I met some in a bar, I'd definitely try to seduce, and I'd definitely try to get to a private place with. Could I fuck them? I DON'T KNOW. But I do like to watch the femboy thread. Am I gay? Well, usually, I'm being targetted as a guy who's somewhat hostile (which btw is totally false: out on HA and in my life, I always strongly defend gay rights)...
I think Rusty Eldorado and Seanchai have made the most enlightening comments, at the beggining of the thread. What does these numbers mean? Fuck! nothing at all.
But hey! you want to call me gay, or bi, I have no problem with it. And fuck you if you do...

[BellaBellucci]

Hmm? who are you exactly??

I think I might be gay. :whistle:

~BB~

[MacShreach]

Amy's right. The way Ec drew these stats up just doesn't work, though it's amusing. The CD/Siss/whatever stuff tends to coagulate together partly because if it shows up anywhere else it gets flamed. In other words, you could say that it has been successfully contained, but the consquence of that is that the stockade is pretty full. It's of a totally different character from the hundreds or maybe thousands of single-girl threads, the 'who is she?' threads etc.

The one thing that you can infer from looking at HA, though not from those stats, is that there appears to be a very small mumber of posters and an overwhelming number of lurkers. Those who post are content-providers for the entertainment of the rest, in other words. I think this was always the case but is much more marked now. That's probably just a consequence of scale.

On any given day, I probably look at half a dozen threads here. Some days a bit more, some days a bit less. That being the case I am pretty selective. I came in here because the thread was started by Ec. No other reason. I stayed, I read. What that demonstrates is that even if there were some statistical validity to the numbers, which as Amy rightly showed there is not, you would still not be able to extrapolate from that a behavioural profile of users, as some have suggested.

This site has over 100,000 subscribers and some of those threads are many years old, so the daily attention they are getting as a percentage of the potential number of clicks, were all the users online, is so tiny as to be meaningless.

What is more likely to be the case, given the overall profile of the site, is that a small number of members are very active in the high-scoring threads.

[Prospero]

I think that is a very valid judgement MacShreach... and i think my earlier comments did not take account of the history of some the threads included.

[Ecstatic]

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

The conclusions you appear to be drawing are flawed for the type of statistical analysis you're making. The most obvious issue is that you're examining total posts only while ignoring a number of other crucial factors. Here are some other points you'd have to account for.


Age of thread - If one thread is 8 years old and has 3 million posts while another is a month old and has a million posts... well that's not a valid comparison.

Performance throughout the thread's life - In the above example you might find that the three million post thread ALSO had a million posts in it's first month. You have to examine not just age but performance throughout it's life

What posters are represented by those threads - You might have one thread with four million posts coming from four posters while another thread has a hundred thousand posts by a hundred thousand posters. Factoring in who posted and how much each of them posted is kind of critical before you can infer anything.

The actual subject of the thread - For example, in your thailand streetwalker thread it appears that you assumed the thread was about streetwalking but couldn't it easily have been thai trans women? You might find that the title of the thread gives little indication as to the subject. Also, a thread about crossdressers might be consumed with off topic posts about peanutbutter and jelly sandwiches. You'll likely find that those threads actually have multiple topics all of which are unrelated to the OP.

Sorry, I know I'm taking it way too seriously but I could just see my statics professors throttling me if I didn't say anything. In short, the only thing you can infer from those threads is that hung angels has threads with a lot of posts... or possibly that I really like peanutbutter and jelly sandwiches.

Good points, Amy, but please note that I did not attempt any statistical analysis of these data, I only presented this intriguing subset of HA data concerning only those threads with over one million views. You are, of course, free to draw your own conclusions and make your own analysis. And each of your points is well-taken; there was (by me, the OP) no attempt to derive any meaningful conclusion from this superficial look at a small subset of very visible HA topics viz-a-viz the entire HA repository.

[iagodelgado]

the entire HA repository.

The entire HA repository? :party:

[danthepoetman]

I think I might be gay. :whistle:

~BB~
What you are above anything is bright and adorable, lady.

[EZWind]

.... its as interesting as a paper bag, what's the fascination?

well, it's called Art, assuming you're serious and not just goofing around. The way it works is, artists imagine something in their minds, then they take a blank canvas or paper (or, these days, a series of ones and zeroes) and create something where there was nothing. It's a gift and it's magical and, tho you may not always like it, it's decidedly more interesting than paper bags

[BellaBellucci]

What you are above anything is bright and adorable, lady.

Thank you. I try. :)

~BB~