Leg Hair........

[onmyknees]

So I'm standing outside this biker bar with a few friends getting ready to take off and this hot young Brazilian girl and her dude walk past. She's wearing these hot little white shorts and sexy heels. She jumps on the back of his rice rocket and I got a close up of her legs.....the hair was light, but thicker than a Persian rug. I understand the cultural thing, but I can't imagine her wrappin' those legs around me. A beautiful pair of legs covered in hair....Ever slip between the sheets with a lady and get assaulted by a pair of unshaven legs?

[Dino Velvet]

Agreed. I dated a German/Irish gal who believed she didn't need to shave above the knee. Her hair was very light and blonde but it was noticeable.

Most gals I date these days have no hair below their slanty eyebrows.

I think I told you my Persian Rug story before.

[danthepoetman]

I get chills down my spine just thinking about hairy women’s legs. Call it a stereotype any time, women’s skin is soft and delicate and I just want to feel it. Besides, there’s still something weird about a hairy girl’s body; it’s like beard: it just doesn’t fit there…
And it’s not just culture. We have biological impulses to see what belongs to the other sex as particularly beautiful and attractive; it’s normal to view hair the same way; women have generally less, it seems better that way...

[Willie Escalade]

Andrea Ravel comes to mind...

[danthepoetman]

Well, Willie, I think it's the case of Brazilian women in general, isn't it? I think many have that cream or stuff or whatever, that makes the hair thinner and blonder or paler. They use that on themselves rather than shaving or epilating… But in my opinion, it’s just not as nice as lovely, hairless, soft legs…

[Baileyluv]

i looked into that laser removal for my ABS, shits expensive and not permanant, but agreed legs on anyone im interested in must be shaved

[Jamie French]

Women generally also have a lot less penis, sooooo.... maybe want to rethink your point there?


I get chills down my spine just thinking about hairy women’s legs. Call it a stereotype any time, women’s skin is soft and delicate and I just want to feel it. Besides, there’s still something weird about a hairy girl’s body; it’s like beard: it just doesn’t fit there…
And it’s not just culture. We have biological impulses to see what belongs to the other sex as particularly beautiful and attractive; it’s normal to view hair the same way; women have generally less, it seems better that way...

[Baileyluv]

Women generally also have a lot less penis, sooooo.... maybe want to rethink your point there?

most of the womens I like have penis, am I thinking ryte, lol

[danthepoetman]

Women generally also have a lot less penis, sooooo.... maybe want to rethink your point there?

Yeah, but my point, Jamie, is that of course, we like women (with or without penises) to increase their feminine attributes. That’s biological, natural! That’s just the way we tend to feel physically. Of course, there’s other tendencies, and it’s ok too; but I mean in general, even women themselves are repulsed at seeing other women’s hairy legs!
(Love your new avatar)

[Jamie French]

Ok, but a penis is the exact opposite of a feminine attribute so by your logic that has to be the first thing to go, even before leg hair... we all have that to some degree but if the aim is accent the feminine then the penis has got to go first. So... I'm just saying, you may want to rethink what you're saying cause it just doesn't hold water on a forum like this. (my point being that the "it's biologically natural" argument is the same one used to fuck with gays, queers and all the other kinds of inbetweeners. What's truly 'biologically natural' is utter sexual chaos with a majority leaning towards the hetero)


Yeah, but my point, Jamie, is that of course, we like women (with or without penises) to increase their feminine attributes. That’s biological, natural! That’s just the way we tend to feel physically. Of course, there’s other tendencies, and it’s ok too; but I mean in general, even women themselves are repulsed at seeing other women’s hairy legs!
(Love your new avatar)

[danthepoetman]

I’m talking about a tendency, which your “leading towards hetero” partly expresses. You won’t deny the reality of biology and of biological impulses, Jamie? There IS sexual attributes between sexes; it’s not something I invented. Why are you making of this such a matter of semantics?
You should think about your logic, in such a case: anything would then go; you should make porn with a beard, for that matter, or indeed, with hairy legs. Maybe guys would like that... Why do you, yourself, put make up on? Or tell me, if it’s not precisely for the reason I just invoked, why would t-women use feminine hormones? androgen blockers? We all tend to emphasize on sexual attributes and characteristics to fit our inner feeling of gender. It’s definitely not something which is at odd with anything on this forum, on the contrary, of course. You also know that sexual orientation has nothing to do with it, and besides, I never said being gay was unnatural… Moreover, I strongly believe that transsexualism is a biological condition, and that it is possible for a woman to have a penis. Don’t you?
I find that you’re not making much sense, and you’re trying to find God knows what argument with me, for which I won’t follow because I find it absurd…

[giovanni_hotel]

Aesthetically speaking, hairy legs on a woman is not a winner. GG or TG.

Just because a man prefers women with a penis doesn't mean he likes his women to look hairy and scary.

You ladies still don't get how having a penis fits into the attraction men have for tgirls.

Quit trolling, Jamie.

[Jamie French]

I'm not at all trying to start an argument with you. All I'm saying is that going on and on about emphasizing a woman's natural attributes because it's so natural for a man to be attracted to them doesn't make sense when it's coming from someone who also likes a penis on a woman. It's like trying to have your cake and eat it to. Just be plain about it and say hairy legs aren't your thing instead of trying to lump it into some big convoluted philosophy about what's natural and what's not. Not everything stems from some grand theory. You just don't dig body hair is all.

And giovanni... raising an eyebrow towards someone's claims by way of text is not trolling. It's called discussion. Look into it.

Also, there's a certain type of dude common amoung these boards that segregate themselves as persecuted by the ladies on this board for some sort of misunderstanding of ya'lls attraction to us. That's not giving us enough credit as fully actuated humans. I'm dating a trans right now and the basis of our attraction is that we enjoy ourselves for who we are as people. There is no emphasis placed on genitalia, fetishes, body types, gender, etc. Just people being people. THAT'S the only kind of attraction you or anyone else should worried about. BUT, this is a porn forum. Sex is gonna be the first things on most posters mind while visiting this den of secret boners.


I’m talking about a tendency, which your “leading towards hetero” partly expresses. You won’t deny the reality of biology and of biological impulses, Jamie? There IS sexual attributes between sexes; it’s not something I invented. Why are you making of this such a matter of semantics?
You should think about your logic, in such a case: anything would then go; you should make porn with a beard, for that matter, or indeed, with hairy legs. Maybe guys would like that... Why do you, yourself, put make up on? Or tell me, if it’s not precisely for the reason I just invoked, why would t-women use feminine hormones? androgen blockers? We all tend to emphasize on sexual attributes and characteristics to fit our inner feeling of gender. It’s definitely not something which is at odd with anything on this forum, on the contrary, of course. You also know that sexual orientation has nothing to do with it, and besides, I never said being gay was unnatural… Moreover, I strongly believe that transsexualism is a biological condition, and that it is possible for a woman to have a penis. Don’t you?
I find that you’re not making much sense, and you’re trying to find God knows what argument with me, for which I won’t follow because I find it absurd…

[Jamie French]

And to answer a question posed to me... No, I don't believe a woman can have a penis. I believe a transgendered woman can have a penis. That's why the word transgendered exists. I'm a transgendered woman, not a biological woman. And I'm fiercely proud of it. Science first. Self imposed Identity designation second.

[danthepoetman]

I guess we both made our points and there’s no reason to go on arguing, yet I disagree with you, Jamie, on the idea that there’s no deeper ground than personal taste to find more attractive women who emphasize the attributes of their sex. I think it is to a large extent natural to do so and it does have a biological basis. The beauty we find in sexes precisely comes from such differences and that is why we try our best to increase their effect more or less artificially every day in ourselves.

I also am not only attracted to women with a penis: I am attracted to all women and find that those which do have a penis just to be a bit different (generally speaking). I must admit that, as oppose to many men here on this forum, the little extra is not the main interest to me in a t-women, on the contrary.
When it comes to making a difference between women and t-women, I don’t find it unreasonable, and I respect your position, but simultaneously, we’ve been told by transgendered women forever that we should indeed consider them as women to the full extent of the word. So I do.
I’m not trying to make out of this any kind of great principle statement. If it seems that way, I suppose I’m not expressing myself properly. And I will concede to you anytime that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to transgenderism, and that on the contrary, you do. But that’s another reason why I’m here on this forum: because I’m fascinated and I want to learn, and because I have admiration for your courage and your dedication. For me, the discovery of transgenderism dates back to a time when there practically were no transsexual porn, not mainstream at least, somewhere in the 80s, and intellectual interest and admiration preceded the sexual attraction in me.
As far as preferences goes well, ok: I do confess preferring women with nice, lovely, hairless legs and cute feet like yours, Jamie…
(I definitely love that avatar.)

[Jericho]

Hairy legs on a chick...Good look?

[Quiet Reflections]

I can't stand hairy legs on a woman, but her legs her choice. I wouldn't base my attraction solely on leg hair but the part it would play would vary depending on the rest of the package. An ugly woman with hairy legs is always no go but a beautiful woman with slight growth (gg or otherwise) may get a pass (up to a point). One thing is for sure, I wouldn't ask/make a woman shave because I'm not shaving my face for her. Live and let live, there is someone out there for everyone.........sometimes more than one.

[Teydyn]

And it’s not just culture. We have biological impulses to see what belongs to the other sex as particularly beautiful and attractive; it’s normal to view hair the same way; women have generally less, it seems better that way...
It is culture.

Or do you think "biological impulses" changed over the last 100 years that much?

[danthepoetman]

Women were epilating themselves in Ancient Greece! It’s not like it’s a recent practice…

[danthepoetman]

Besides, I’m talking about the fact that we accentuate sexual gender characters because it’s largely what bases our sense of beauty and attraction for the other sex, for obvious biological and evolutive reasons… Sociology has a place there, but there definitely is a biological basis.

[Wendy Summers]

but I mean in general, even women themselves are repulsed at seeing other women’s hairy legs!
(Love your new avatar)

I know a few lesbians who would argue that point. :dancing:

[danthepoetman]

Precisely, yes, Wendy. What I’m saying is not politically correct. We have taken for granted for a good while that we are tabula rasa and that culture is everything. We now know this not to be true. It was an avatar of the old body and soul perspective. We know it today, it is discussed more and more in specialized fields, but it doesn’t fit in many discourses. We are animals and we have to find biology in the root of our behaviour. But of course, I’m speaking in general here, and NOT trying to make a statement of principle. And especially not on hairy legs…

[Wendy Summers]

Precisely, yes, Wendy. What I’m saying is not politically correct. We have taken for granted for a good while that we are tabula rasa and that culture is everything. We now know this not to be true. It was an avatar of the old body and soul perspective. We know it today, it is discussed more and more in specialized fields, but it doesn’t fit in many discourses. We are animals and we have to find biology in the root of our behaviour. But of course, I’m speaking in general here, and NOT trying to make a statement of principle. And especially not on hairy legs…

TL;DR

Here's baby oiled, smooth naked tranny legs in response:

http://www.wendysummers.com/tour/galleries/50/cover.jpg (http://www.wendysummers.com/tour)

[danthepoetman]

Yum yum! And you have such lovely feet, Wendy!

[Wendy Summers]

Yum yum! And you have such lovely feet, Wendy!

I decided for a thread talking about bodies there weren't enough pictures...

[Baileyluv]

I'm not at all trying to start an argument with you. All I'm saying is that going on and on about emphasizing a woman's natural attributes because it's so natural for a man to be attracted to them doesn't make sense when it's coming from someone who also likes a penis on a woman. It's like trying to have your cake and eat it to. Just be plain about it and say hairy legs aren't your thing instead of trying to lump it into some big convoluted philosophy about what's natural and what's not. Not everything stems from some grand theory. You just don't dig body hair is all.

And giovanni... raising an eyebrow towards someone's claims by way of text is not trolling. It's called discussion. Look into it.

Also, there's a certain type of dude common amoung these boards that segregate themselves as persecuted by the ladies on this board for some sort of misunderstanding of ya'lls attraction to us. That's not giving us enough credit as fully actuated humans. I'm dating a trans right now and the basis of our attraction is that we enjoy ourselves for who we are as people. There is no emphasis placed on genitalia, fetishes, body types, gender, etc. Just people being people. THAT'S the only kind of attraction you or anyone else should worried about. BUT, this is a porn forum. Sex is gonna be the first things on most posters mind while visiting this den of secret boners.

so many semantics, with the attractions here, so much labeling and bashing. These make it hard for some to come right out with their true feelings or agendas(FALOBW), i will be the first to say i guess the labels and shit help sometimes, as identy can be hard to explain, understand, or indentify with.

i have found and love the label of PAN, i completely indentfy with it, peoples shells are just that, shells. The true beauty and attractiveness comes from with in, and shines brighter than any dam clothes, tits, ass or whatever. Sexuallity and shit like that seem to just muck things up for most, they just cant see the root attraction, or have issues and are attracted to the wrong qualities, from lets say commercial propaganda and such.

yes this is a porn site first and foremost, but these are still people, and they have feelings and have complete lifes away from porn(im asssuming, bare with me). the persucuted put that shit on themselves, as they feed into the behavior, instead of raising above it, or owning it, no one should ever allow themselves to get to that point(unless you like eating worms, pitty party style)

Im married ,and we, married or not, or just in a realationship, should know that we make compromises all the time, its how things work, since we are no where near perfect yet. while we may perfer things a certain way, well life has a way of making you bend to accomidate.


end rant

[Westheangelino]

I love love love women with hairy pits and bush. I'm neutral on legs. But I'm not a fan of the trend of taking off every little inch of hair.

[Jamie French]

I've been going back and forth with danthepoetman without addressing the topic directly.

NO hair anywhere. That's my personal policy when it comes to my body. I just wouldn't do that to someone who is about to touch me or see me in an intimate light. There's something unhygienic about unkempt pubes and body hair makes for horrible tactile sensation. If parts of me are not smooth, those parts stay hidden. I expect the same courtesy. I'll let a dude pass if it's not too bad, but if I'm eating ass or topping, it better be bowling ball smooth down there or it's a no go.

[onmyknees]

I've been going back and forth with danthepoetman without addressing the topic directly.

NO hair anywhere. That's my personal policy when it comes to my body. I just wouldn't do that to someone who is about to touch me or see me in an intimate light. There's something unhygienic about unkempt pubes and body hair makes for horrible tactile sensation. If parts of me are not smooth, those parts stay hidden. I expect the same courtesy. I'll let a dude pass if it's not too bad, but if I'm eating ass or topping, it better be bowling ball smooth down there or it's a no go.


:Bowdown: Finally ....lol....we got side tracked on cocks there for a few posts...but hey , it happens !

Like your answer.

[danthepoetman]

I also apologize, Onmyknees. I completely forgot about the OP for a while. Sorry!

[giovanni_hotel]

Wrong in every conceivable way!!
She looks like her daddy is a golden retriever.

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/attachment.php?attachmentid=494934&stc=1&d=1345028879

[rydermorrison]

Wrong in every conceivable way!!
She looks like her daddy is a golden retriever.

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/attachment.php?attachmentid=494934&stc=1&d=1345028879

Lol wow

[Wendy Summers]

Either a photoshop or a photobomb... no way those legs are physically connected to the body in the background...

[danthepoetman]

Thankfully, you’re most probably right, Wendy. Unless it’s the wolfman’s little sister…

[onmyknees]

Lol wow


Yea...this is an extreme case, but it hammers home the point. The subject in question ( the hot Brazilian chic...hot from the neck up) didn't have hair like this, it was lighter and less course, but even a little is way too much for me. I can't imagine what a little forepay and leg worship must be like with a jack russel terrier. Call me a western extremist. :dancing:

[Dino Velvet]

Wrong in every conceivable way!!
She looks like her daddy is a golden retriever.

http://www.hungangels.com/vboard/attachment.php?attachmentid=494934&stc=1&d=1345028879

Chewbacca sound byte - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pr3sBks5o_8)

[Odelay]

I agree with Westtheangelo about pubic and underarm hair - me likesie, and will actually go further and be the first one on this thread to admit to being turned on by hairy legs sometimes. Especially Brazilian babes. It just seems right on them. That said, the vast majority of women keep their legs bare so I don't discriminate against the hairless. :8

[onmyknees]

I agree with Westtheangelo about pubic and underarm hair - me likesie, and will actually go further and be the first one on this thread to admit to being turned on by hairy legs sometimes. Especially Brazilian babes. It just seems right on them. That said, the vast majority of women keep their legs bare so I don't discriminate against the hairless. :8

did your friends get you chia pets for your birthday when you were a kid? Hey.....god's speed dude . you like what you like, but you're the first american dude I've ever encountered that liked a ferret under a girls arm. :hide-1:

[Westheangelino]

I just love that hair is sooooo taboo among Americans. So silly to me