Please ban Jamie Michelle

[The American Nightmare]

That guy's a fucking retard.

[Jamie Michelle]

That guy's a fucking retard.

There is no need for you to project upon me your own condition, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.

[ezed]

That guy's a fucking retard.

There is no need for you to project upon me your own condition, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.

Did you post this two minutes after my post on the other thread. I'm relying on the honor system.

THE AMERICAN NIGHTMARE- two minutes for assaulting a player in the penalty box.

[fishman33]

That guy's a fucking retard.

LOL

While I do agree that he is a fucking retard, I'm not a fan of censorship in any form. I guess wasting all that bandwidth with 5,000 words of non-sense in every post is a banable offense, but don't ban him just for stupidity- we all might find ourselves in trouble if that happens. How 'bout we compromise and remove the 'hot hung angel' monicker from his avatar. I think we can all agree on that.

While we're on the subject of banning, why was YourDaddy banned? I know that he often got into scrapes on here, but all he ever did that I saw was sit on the right side of the fence. I don't think his attacks were anymore severe than anything that was afflicted on him. Did I miss somethign major while I was away?

[tubgirl]

has anyone seen pics of jamie michelle?

[Jamie Michelle]

That guy's a fucking retard.

LOL

While I do agree that he is a fucking retard, I'm not a fan of censorship in any form. I guess wasting all that bandwidth with 5,000 words of non-sense in every post is a banable offense, but don't ban him just for stupidity- we all might find ourselves in trouble if that happens. How 'bout we compromise and remove the 'hot hung angel' . from his avatar. I think we can all agree on that.

While we're on the subject of banning, why was YourDaddy banned? I know that he often got into scrapes on here, but all he ever did that I saw was sit on the right side of the fence. I don't think his attacks were anymore severe than anything that was afflicted on him. Did I miss somethign major while I was away?

Actually, I am a literal genius, with an IQ of over 140. Rather, you simply dislike the truths that I speak so you project upon me your own condition in an attempt to reduce me to your pathetic level.

Below is some more truth to fuel your cognitive dissonance:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

[BeardedOne]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought. :roll:

[BeardedOne]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought. :roll:

[BeardedOne]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought. :roll:

[Jamie Michelle]

I'm just irked by redundant cut-n-paste posts that don't display any effort or original thought. :roll:

Indeed it does fuel your cognitive dissonance.

Perhaps you would care to attempt to refute the below articles? Of course, you can't refute them, because they are true.

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

[BeardedOne]

I'll stop now.

Though others, I'm sure, will go on and on and on and on... :sleep

:smh

[The American Nightmare]

Perhaps you would care to attempt to refute the below articles?
No, we wouldn't.

How many times do people have to ignore you? How many times do people have to clearly state that they do not care? No matter how often people express disinterest, you continue to fantasize that somebody actually cares.

Let me explain it to you as clearly as possible.

There is not a single person on this forum that cares about you say. You are a spam-bot that continually derails threads with completely off-topic cut-and-paste posts. This has been made clear to you many times, yet you continue to make an ass of yourself.

If you want to discuss conspiracy theories, you're on the wrong website.

You are worse than the Jehovah's Witnesses. At least you can close your door on them.[/size]

And a suggestion: Put a link in your signature, to whatever site it is that you grab your news articles from. If anyone is interested, they'll check it out themselves.

[Jamie Michelle]

Perhaps you would care to attempt to refute the below articles?
No, we wouldn't.

How many times do people have to ignore you? How many times do people have to clearly state that they do not care? No matter how often people express disinterest, you continue to fantasize that somebody actually cares.

Let me explain it to you as clearly as possible.

There is not a single person on this forum that cares about you say. You are a spam-bot that continually derails threads with completely off-topic cut-and-paste posts. This has been made clear to you many times, yet you continue to make an ass of yourself.

If you want to discuss conspiracy theories, you're on the wrong website.

You are worse than the Jehovah's Witnesses. At least you can close your door on them.[/size]

And a suggestion: Put a link in your signature, to whatever site it is that you grab your news articles from. If anyone is interested, they'll check it out themselves.

Your above statements are false. There are a number of people here who are thankful for my speaking the truth. I know this because they have told me.

Nor have I spammed in my entire life. I post information where it is relevant.

And unlike you and those of your ilk, I do not believe in any conspiracy theories, such as the U.S. government's lying, self-serving, a-historical, a-factual, and provably false official fairy tale conspiracy theory concerning the 9/11 attacks.

Below is some truth for you to fuel your cognitive dissonance:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

[tsntx]

number of ppl happy w/ u "speaking truth"?????


name 3 you heartless weirdo

[ManOfSteel]

Where do you keep coming up with these fucking conspiracy theories. Its like a broken record.

Your smoking the wrong stuff buddy.

[Jdeere562]

Perhaps you would care to attempt to refute the below articles? Of
course, you can't refute them, because they are true.


Pretty damn hard to refute what I refuse to read. I actually have a life to live. You may possibly be an intelligent son-of-a-bitch and I don't doubt that. Maybe you need to get a job or something? Seems you have too much idle time to produce all these ramblings. Too many smarts can make a person really dumb. I know all too many IQ people who have to call a plumber when the moving parts inside a toilet tank malfunction. Now that's some smart sum-bitches.

[The American Nightmare]

Nor have I spammed in my entire life. I post information where it is relevant. >> This << (http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=7395&highlight=) is relevant?

In addition, I should point out that you are erroneously using the term cognitive dissonance. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cognitive%20dissonance)

[Jamie Michelle]

number of ppl happy w/ u "speaking truth"?????


name 3 you heartless weirdo

As far as naming people who are thankful for my speaking the truth, I'm not sure they want me to name them, since many have thanked me via personal communication. But I could name a whole heck of a lote more people than three.

And there is no need for you to project your own condition upon me, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.

[Jamie Michelle]

Where do you keep coming up with these fucking conspiracy theories. Its like a broken record.

Your smoking the wrong stuff buddy.

Unlike you and those of your ilk, I do not believe in any conspiracy theories, such as the U.S. government's lying, self-serving, a-historical, a-factual, and provably false official fairy tale conspiracy theory concerning the 9/11 attacks.

Below is some truth for you to fuel your cognitive dissonance:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

[Jdeere562]

number of ppl happy w/ u "speaking truth"?????


name 3 you heartless weirdo

Hopefully he has a mother and two brainwashed sisters.

Yet more proof why: some species eat their young.

[Jamie Michelle]

Nor have I spammed in my entire life. I post information where it is relevant. >> This << (http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=7395&highlight=) is relevant?

In addition, I should point out that you are erroneously using the term cognitive dissonance. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cognitive%20dissonance)

Your above statement is false. But since you suffer from cognitive dissonance, it's not surprising that you dislike it being accurately applied to yourself.

Below is some truth for you to fuel your cognitive dissonance:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005:

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

[Texass_Guy]

number of ppl happy w/ u "speaking truth"?????


name 3 you heartless weirdo


I'll bet a dollar Jamie Michelle replies with "Me, Myself, and I"

:lol:

[The American Nightmare]

Nor have I spammed in my entire life. I post information where it is relevant. >> This << (http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=7395&highlight=) is relevant?

In addition, I should point out that you are erroneously using the term cognitive dissonance. (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cognitive%20dissonance)

Your above statement is false. But since you suffer from cognitive dissonance, it's not surprising that you dislike it being accurately applied to yourself.

Below is some truth for you to fuel your cognitive dissonance:

[words]

You know, I was just nitpicking. It's not a big deal if you're incorrectly using a phrase; it just bugs me a little. I even posted a link to the definition to prove my point.

But your response to my post gives a good insight to your state of mind. You have completely disassociated yourself from reality. What's next? Are you gonna tell me the earth is flat? Or perhaps you will un-jack yourself from the Matrix and defend Zion from the robots?

[NYCe]

Why do you keep cutting and pasting that article summary on 9/11?

[Jamie Michelle]

Cognitive Dissonance: Quote from "Basic Psychology," Henry Gleitman, Norton 1983 "Cognitive Consistency":

http://web.archive.org/web/20030511105349/http://www.caicusa.org/general/cogdiss.htm

Cognitive dissonance:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

---

The corollary to cognitive dissonance is denial--either that, or coming to terms with a hard, hated and feared truth.

In other words, people who have supported the U.S. government, or at least who have believed that it isn't possible that the U.S. government could commit mass-murder against its own citizens via staged attacks in order to obtain more funding, power and control, and who thus cannot come to terms with that fact, suffer from cognitive dissonance, since to come to terms with that fact would mean that they would have to come to terms with having lived a lie. Hence, in order to avoid coming to terms with this hard, hated and feared truth, said peope go into denial, caused by their cognitive dissonance (i.e., their state of uneasiness at the thought of having lived a lie).

[The American Nightmare]

Or you could just admit that you're using big words to make others think you're smart.

[Jdeere562]

Or you could just admit that you're using big words to make others think you're smart.

Not really...using the same old b/s and links that makes me want to sign off and go to bed. Good night all. I'm done with crazy watch for the night. Someone else's turn at post. My fried chicken calls me. Next it will be the government killed the chicken with thermite planted beneath the drumsticks. The hatchet on the neck was just a cover-up. ;)

[chefmike]

Or you could just admit that you're using big words to make others think you're smart.

Not really...using the same old b/s and links that makes me want to sign off and go to bed. Good night all. I'm done with crazy watch for the night. Someone else's turn at post. My fried chicken calls me. Next it will be the government killed the chicken with thermite planted beneath the drumsticks. The hatchet on the neck was just a cover-up. ;)

At least your mention of fried chicken might inspire this batshit crazy clown to post something other that the same lunatic bot spam that he repeats every post...lets hear your conspiracy theories regarding the global elitists and bird flu, nutjob...and who really killed Princess Di, was it Elvis or Buddy Holly?

[slinky]

Is the reason this topic keeps being posted is that we're on a tranny site and the towers were like two huge phallic symbols?

[slinky]

My fried chicken calls me.

You really need to get off the psychotropic stuff. ;).

[ManOfSteel]

Jamie Michelle shut your anorexic malnutrition tapeworm-having overdose on Barry Chamish Bohemian diet-drinking ass up.

[scipio]

Is the reason this topic keeps being posted is that we're on a tranny site and the towers were like two huge phallic symbols?

Yeah sure... that's what they WANT you to believe. But the elitist imperialist aggressors have for years been hiding the fact that buildings are actually FEMININE symbols (see Taj Mahal, giant boobies, etc.). I believe someone was onto this in September 2001, and was about to find the evidence (the so-called "Frank Lloyd Wright Code") in one of the towers, and the evidence had to be destroyed.

But the correlation between jugs and wedding tackle made this board the obvious choice for such a revelation.

[HungDevil]

How could the second in command of the universe be an anarchist? How could a prince of peace (Jesus) not want to govern? It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to come to the conclusion that Jesus (the King of Kings) was an anarchist.

I am here reminded of Special Ed from Crank Yankers.

Here is an episode:http://tinyurl.com/zwa39

[tsntx]

number of ppl happy w/ u "speaking truth"?????


name 3 you heartless weirdo

As far as naming people who are thankful for my speaking the truth, I'm not sure they want me to name them, since many have thanked me via personal communication. But I could name a whole heck of a lote more people than three.

And there is no need for you to project your own condition upon me, other than your need to attempt to reduce me to your own pathetic level.


so basically ur pathetic ass couldnt name 3? right? you stupid uni-brow having douche go fuck ur self w/ lit stick of dynamite....

[tsntx]

Or you could just admit that you're using big words to make others think you're smart.


that cant be it... no one thinks this dude is smart... not even his mom and two sisters and not even him, himself and i guess him? lol - j

[chefmike]

How could the second in command of the universe be an anarchist?


Dick Cheney is an anarchist?

[marissaazts]

what is funny is i think jamie really believes the shit she types

NEED MORE TINFOIL jamie much more

[Jaxon]

I registered for the sole purpose of informing you that Jamie Michelle is trolling this forum and that threads like this feed the trolling. Not that it isn't funny.

[latrix67]

Funny how she has'nt spouted much of the crap that she posted on the 'Damn!! I'm going to..' thread.personally,I'm ignoring her rantings & conspiracy sh1te for one very simple reason.-
It's demeans the sacrifices being made by the military so she can spout her sh1te frely & it also is a slur on the thousands of lives lost on 9/11 not only the civillians but New York's finest (NYPD/NYFD & others) who gallently tried to save lives and did not return that day. And all the lives lost since,military & civillian.


FREEDOM - An extract from CONTACT

Its is the soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us Freedom of the Press
It is the soldier, not the poet
Who has given us Freedom of Speech
It is the soldier, not the campus organiser
Who has given us the Freedom to Demonstrate
It is the soldier who serves beneath the flag
Who salutes the flag
Whose coffin is drapped in the flag
Who allows the protester to burn the flag
It is the soldier, not the politician
who has given his blood, his body, his life
Who has given us these freedoms?

God Bless Those who pay the ultimate price
Gone but never forgotten

[fishman33]

Funny how she has'nt spouted much of the crap that she posted on the 'Damn!! I'm going to..' thread.personally,I'm ignoring her rantings & conspiracy sh1te for one very simple reason.-
It's demeans the sacrifices being made by the military so she can spout her sh1te frely & it also is a slur on the thousands of lives lost on 9/11 not only the civillians but New York's finest (NYPD/NYFD & others) who gallently tried to save lives and did not return that day. And all the lives lost since,military & civillian.


FREEDOM - An extract from CONTACT

Its is the soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us Freedom of the Press
It is the soldier, not the poet
Who has given us Freedom of Speech
It is the soldier, not the campus organiser
Who has given us the Freedom to Demonstrate
It is the soldier who serves beneath the flag
Who salutes the flag
Whose coffin is drapped in the flag
Who allows the protester to burn the flag
It is the soldier, not the politician
who has given his blood, his body, his life
Who has given us these freedoms?

God Bless Those who pay the ultimate price
Gone but never forgotten

that's a right on, L67. right on.

[HungDevil]

It's demeans the sacrifices being made by the military so she can spout her sh1te frely & it also is a slur on the thousands of lives lost on 9/11 not only the civillians but New York's finest (NYPD/NYFD & others) who gallently tried to save lives and did not return that day. And all the lives lost since,military & civillian.


Oh, please put down that flag! Saying that 9-11 was engineered, or otherwise allowed to happen doesn't demean those you mentioned above . I happen to agree with Jamie that 9-11 was allowed to happen (her penchant for posting the same things over and over again is quite disturbing though). Yet I still recognize that innocent people died, and that is what makes me even more angry.

[GroobySteven]

FREEDOM - An extract from CONTACT

Its is the soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us Freedom of the Press
It is the soldier, not the poet
Who has given us Freedom of Speech
It is the soldier, not the campus organiser
Who has given us the Freedom to Demonstrate
It is the soldier who serves beneath the flag
Who salutes the flag
Whose coffin is drapped in the flag
Who allows the protester to burn the flag
It is the soldier, not the politician
who has given his blood, his body, his life
Who has given us these freedoms?

God Bless Those who pay the ultimate price
Gone but never forgotten

I think that's a pretty sick and incredibly naive piece of prose. Soldiers follow politicians without question. This writing and self-backslapping supposes politicians always make the righteous, objective and proper decision. Bollocks.
seanchai

[slinky]

Or you could just admit that you're using big words to make others think you're smart.

My girfriend broke up with me today.

She yelled at me "I can't go out with you anymore. You're a pedophile."

I told her "That's an awfully big word for a thirteen year old to be throwing around"

[Lord Goatse]

Actually, I am a literal genius, with an IQ of over 140.

Lord Goatse finds this rather amusing. Having an IQ of 140 and posting the vacuous drivel that this vexatious little nematode spews forth is like having a 14" todger and turning celibate.

[chefmike]

Actually, I am a literal genius, with an IQ of over 140.

So what, it just goes to show that you and Ted Kaczynski have more than one thing in common... :screwy

[Jdeere562]

[/quote]

My girfriend broke up with me today.

She yelled at me "I can't go out with you anymore. You're a pedophile."

I told her "That's an awfully big word for a thirteen year old to be throwing around"[/quote]

Funny! Thanks for the laugh, I needed that tonight. You have style.