PDA

View Full Version : Dangerous Retard



Nicole Dupre
08-14-2011, 06:36 PM
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/14/bachmann-on-gays-i-dont-judge-them/#.Tkf3KMiL5O8.

trish
08-14-2011, 07:09 PM
Anyone who supports that ignorant, LGBT-hating bitch (who perpetually looks like she's posing for a badly photographed strangulation porn shoot) is no friend of any girl in these forums.

Nicole Dupre
08-14-2011, 09:09 PM
Anyone who supports that ignorant, LGBT-hating bitch (who perpetually looks like she's posing for a badly photographed strangulation porn shoot) is no friend of any girl in these forums.
Ever since she caught Marcus and his caddy tongue-kissing behind the country club, her eyeballs have never been the same. lol

Silcc69
08-14-2011, 09:10 PM
Sad thing is that there are a shit ton of people that agree with her.

Nicole Dupre
08-14-2011, 09:20 PM
Sad thing is that there are a shit ton of people that agree with her.
Yeah. Even a few closet cases on this forum.

trish
08-14-2011, 09:30 PM
Sad thing is that there are a shit ton of people that agree with her.

Yeah. Even a few closet cases on this forum.
Which again raises the question, "Why are so many wackos conservative and so many conservatives wacko?" Is it natural gas in the waterlines? The effect of home schooling? Too many people who can't take the responsibility for their own failure, so they blame it on "lefties?" But don't be too depressed. I'm thinking if it's some kind of modern brain cancer, most those wackos will expire soon. Hell most of them are drawing social security already and screaming get your government mits off my medicare while at the same time complaining about the size of government! Isn't it clear OMK's head is about to explode? It's gonna catch up with all of them sooner or later.

Silcc69
08-14-2011, 09:32 PM
Well I dont get how on one they want the government out of OUR lives then when it comes to gay marriage I think it was Bachman that said she would overturn that NY law if she was elected president. HYPOCHRISTIANS at work.

hippifried
08-14-2011, 11:15 PM
One shouldn't confuse reactionary authoritarians like Bachman with conservatives.

trish
08-14-2011, 11:17 PM
Then why do so many reactionary authoritarians identify themselves as conservative and vice versa?

hippifried
08-14-2011, 11:44 PM
because the left/right false dichotomy confuses everything by lumping terms for different unrelated attitudes together as if they were synonyms.

trish
08-15-2011, 12:04 AM
So why is the case that so few authoritarians identify themselves as liberals? Your explanation is symmetric, whereas the actual distribution is not.

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 12:21 AM
I've never been called a "lib" in my life, which is what OMK called me today. I'm fairly apolitical. I mean, I've never even posted in this section of the forum until recently. My politics have always basically been "leave me the hell alone if I'm not bothering you". So I label these people as goose-steppers, not "conservatives".

onmyknees
08-15-2011, 01:59 AM
Whoa gutsy move there ND...... Preach to the choir much? Feed the trolls much? LMAO. Why don't you tell us what or who you do like, and why you like them rather than shower us with your never ending negativity... unless it's constant affirmation you need? I can hear the choir falling in behind you now. ...I agree that Bachmann says some nutty things, but what pol doesn't? I will say at least she's not a disgusting swine...see below at the 5 second mark. Oh that's right....damn it...I'm on ignore too bad you missed this one !! lol

Rep. Barney Frank Farts on Live TV - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaG4A0Bm8c4&feature=player_embedded)

trish
08-15-2011, 02:40 AM
That's your argument? You rest the defense of your views on what may have been a squeaky chair, or Barney Frank passing gas? Hey, just asking. LOL ROTFL AATOSYCTO

And what choir?? I didn't know conservatives were banned from this thread. Oh they aren't. Then nobody, including Nicole, could guarantee conservatives wouldn't read this thread. Consequently Nicole wasn't preaching to the choir. So there you go again OMK, making stupid ass assumptions that are patently ridiculous. And for what? Dramatic effect?

Stavros
08-15-2011, 03:00 AM
As I pointed out in another thread, there seems to be a tactic to undermine Bachmann though a selection of images that are either scary or ones that don't do her any favours. I think that's lame really, I would rather see her exposed to her greatest weakness: the details of policy making, and whether or not, for example, her personal views on homosexuality can be translated into federal policy, which I doubt. I also doubt that social policy issues which are undoubtedly important, will be vote-winners in 2012, but I assume they can set a tone in debate. But are Americans really mad about same-sex unions? I would have preferred to see a debate in Iowa or wherever, on one single topic: where are the next generation of jobs coming from?

At this stage, its all some kind of theatre. For what its worth, the Guardian in the UK seems to think Rick Perry is a shoe-in for the GOP. I also wonder if there is an as-yet unspoken phobia about a woman being Commander-in-Chief. Policy aside, the tone of coverage on both Palin and Bachmann -and it seems similar on both sides of the Atlantic- veers toward a degree of ridicule, absent, for example, with coverage of Ron Paul, Herbert Cain or Mitt Romney. Haven't we been here before: a man with black skin will never occupy the White House? Could a Jew ever get elected President?

giovanni_hotel
08-15-2011, 03:45 AM
Why can't the CON-servatives nominate a candidate the rest of America feels is up to the challenge of serving in the office of POTUS??

Why this reflexive need to nominate the ideologues, the true believers, the flat-earthers??
It's beyond the fact that Bachmann says looney things, she revels in her ignorance and DEFENDS it, which is a greater offense than the alleged 'misstatement' in the first place.

Rick Perry is no better, he thinks being POTUS means you get a red phone hotline to Jesus in times of national crisis.
I wish for once the GOP would nominate the person with an advanced degree or finished first in their class. More than ideology, I HATE seeing dumb people feel entitled to lead this country because they 'represent' America.

Digression.....Trish is that your bewbie???
(Hope so!)

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 04:16 AM
That's your argument? You rest the defense of your views on what may have been a squeaky chair, or Barney Frank passing gas? Hey, just asking. LOL ROTFL AATOSYCTO

And what choir?? I didn't know conservatives were banned from this thread. Oh they aren't. Then nobody, including Nicole, could guarantee conservatives wouldn't read this thread. Consequently Nicole wasn't preaching to the choir. So there you go again OMK, making stupid ass assumptions that are patently ridiculous. And for what? Dramatic effect?
OMG. He didn't put me on ignore? TOTAL stalker! This guy introduced himself to me by sending a PM, telling me he wanted to suck my dick. Very original. Very classy. lol Leave it to these Tea Party people to keep their sexualities in a self-loathing fantasy world closet, on a porn forum. God forbid a closet case, who thought I was hot, actually approached me like a real gentlemen. I wasn't worth it, obviously. But no one is I s'pose.

If I knew he was a crazy closet case redneck, I wouldn't have bothered to be even a little polite to him. Because now, the minute I vocalize my concern about people who are actually considering either "curing" me or charging me with sodomy, I'm a target for him, who had her "choir" to preach to. Suddenly, I've become the "stuck up girl" in high school who inadvertently spurned one of the Trench Coat Mafia losers. And now, every time I try to sit in the lunch room and relax for 30 minutes, he's going to throw a video of Barney Frank farting onto my tray from somewhere across the room. *smdh

HA: where no good deed goes unpunished.

Silcc69
08-15-2011, 04:51 AM
OMG. He didn't put me on ignore? TOTAL stalker! This guy introduced himself to me by sending a PM, telling me he wanted to suck my dick. Very original. Very classy. lol Leave it to these Tea Party people to keep their sexualities in a self-loathing fantasy world closet, on a porn forum. God forbid a closet case, who thought I was hot, actually approached me like a real gentlemen. I wasn't worth it, obviously. But no one is I s'pose.

If I knew he was a crazy closet case redneck, I wouldn't have bothered to be even a little polite to him. Because now, the minute I vocalize my concern about people who are actually considering either "curing" me or charging me with sodomy, I'm a target for him, who had her "choir" to preach to. Suddenly, I've become the "stuck up girl" in high school who inadvertently spurned one of the Trench Coat Mafia losers. And now, every time I try to sit in the lunch room and relax for 30 minutes, he's going to throw a video of Barney Frank farting onto my tray from somewhere across the room. *smdh

HA: where no good deed goes unpunished.

Nicole I want to suck your cock!? There I said it out and in the open.

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 04:56 AM
Nicole I want to suck your cock!? There I said it out and in the open.
Ok. Then I guess we're making some progress here. lol

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 05:40 AM
Secrets are a motherfucker. And the armchair republicans with the biggest ax to grind always have the most skeletons in their closet. The real shame is, people like James & OMK aren't the ones laughing all the way to the bank. They're just towing the line, based on fear of what they've never even tried; being themselves, and not caring what the the world thinks. Very sad.

Ineeda SM
08-15-2011, 05:51 AM
Nicole, I am bored. Can I be a bad parody of you for a while? Please, please, pretty please?

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 05:54 AM
Nicole, I am bored. Can I be a bad parody of you for a while? Please, please, pretty please?
lol Ummmmmm, no. lol

Ineeda SM
08-15-2011, 05:56 AM
lol Ummmmmm, no. lol

Damn Damn Damn! Those people are right. You ARE a mean bitch.:):Bowdown:

Silcc69
08-15-2011, 07:16 AM
Ineeda, ur avatar is disgusting my friend lol.

Ineeda SM
08-15-2011, 07:27 AM
Ineeda, ur avatar is disgusting my friend lol.

So is your GIF in your signature. But that's what I love about it.:)

Hey it's a porn site. Everybody loves cum. LOL.

pantybulge69
08-15-2011, 07:31 AM
who was it that ask if she was a "flake" ? Fox News Chris Wallace ?
She really unravelled on Meet the Press when addressed with judging Gay rights. ANd to think, she just this won Iowa poll-whatever .... wow, now you GOPs have something to be proud of .. what a fuckin' joke !

Ineeda SM
08-15-2011, 07:49 AM
I like the eyes on the guy in the lower left corner as he watches her take on the sausage. You know he's getting a woody.

hippifried
08-15-2011, 08:50 AM
So why is the case that so few authoritarians identify themselves as liberals? Your explanation is symmetric, whereas the actual distribution is not.
Because they started calling themselves "progressives". Another descriptive with no clear meaning. People call themselves all kinds of shit as long as it gets them some attention.

Being liberal or conservative is an attitude, not an ideology.

arnie666
08-15-2011, 08:58 AM
I like the eyes on the guy in the lower left corner as he watches her take on the sausage. You know he's getting a woody.

By the sounds of it,that is the only weiner she ever gets to suck judging by her husband,who you just know without question she will catch in bed with a rentboy,if she hasn't already.

Anyway,while conservative I dislike these religious types because most of the time they don't actually practice what they preach. I don't like organised religion in any form,the only benefit of it,is they do help to control the masses and have good moral ideas, like not sleeping around when married, not killing babies in the womb etc etc. It is just the leaders of them historically are fuking hypocrites. The catholic church for one. Preaching about morals, yet in the backgroung covering up fuking little boys.

I believe as a right winger,the best alternative is to control the masses through harsh laws and I would take a zero tolerance attitude to politicians in government who give a bad example.

If Palin enters the race,both her and her faggot husband will be toast anyway. Believe me if Palin has announced she was running in Iowa no one would be discussing some stupid Poll ,Bachmann or that other idiot ron paul or his lunatic supporters , the media would have gone beserk and they would have flocked to her. She is the rockstar of conservatism and the john wayne of politics. It would be between her and Mitt.

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 09:28 AM
By the sounds of it,that is the only weiner she ever gets to suck judging by her husband,who you just know without question she will catch in bed with a rentboy,if she hasn't already.

Anyway,while conservative I dislike these religious types because most of the time they don't actually practice what they preach. I don't like organised religion in any form,the only benefit of it,is they do help to control the masses and have good moral ideas, like not sleeping around when married, not killing babies in the womb etc etc. It is just the leaders of them historically are fuking hypocrites. The catholic church for one. Preaching about morals, yet in the backgroung covering up fuking little boys.

I believe as a right winger,the best alternative is to control the masses through harsh laws and I would take a zero tolerance attitude to politicians in government who give a bad example.

If Palin enters the race,both her and her faggot husband will be toast anyway. Believe me if Palin has announced she was running in Iowa no one would be discussing some stupid Poll ,Bachmann or that other idiot ron paul or his lunatic supporters , the media would have gone beserk and they would have flocked to her. She is the rockstar of conservatism and the john wayne of politics. It would be between her and Mitt.
That's why you're in the goon squad. You're not much of a philosopher or big achiever, you poor retarded man. :(

arnie666
08-15-2011, 09:40 AM
That's why you're in the goon squad. You're not much of a philosopher or big achiever, you poor retarded man. :(

Are you erect?

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 09:46 AM
Are you erect?
Wouldn't you like to know?

arnie666
08-15-2011, 09:50 AM
Wouldn't you like to know?

Iam squeezing my erect cock through my boxers at the very idea of you jacking off while abusing me behind your computer monitor, an ocean away.

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 09:53 AM
Iam squeezing my erect cock through my boxers at the very idea of you jacking off while abusing me behind your computer monitor, an ocean away.
Well, if you must know, yes. I am. I'm typing this very post with it.

arnie666
08-15-2011, 09:59 AM
Well, if you must know, yes. I am. I'm typing this very post with it.

See I knew it, and your cock sounds quite meaty a worthy adversary to my own. .It's a pity we can't stick our cocks through the computer monitors and have a cock fight to settle this.

Silcc69
08-15-2011, 10:12 AM
Iam squeezing my erect cock through my boxers at the very idea of you jacking off while abusing me behind your computer monitor, an ocean away.

Wait what!?

Stavros
08-15-2011, 03:15 PM
I thought this was the Politics & Religion segment of Hungangels; if people have a real need to be abusive, maybe there should be a separate 'Insults and Abuse' section, so the rest of us can discuss real issues.

Nicole Dupre
08-15-2011, 08:52 PM
I thought this was the Politics & Religion segment of Hungangels; if people have a real need to be abusive, maybe there should be a separate 'Insults and Abuse' section, so the rest of us can discuss real issues.
:Bowdown:

Please forgive me. I'm soooooooo sorry. It's not like your resident fascist alcoholics don't bring this bullshit up constantly on the GD section. You should really report me.

I'll let you do your thing undisturbed. In fact, I won't ever post in here again. I don't want to interrupt you intellectual heavy-weights from solving the world's problems on a shemale porn forum... with pics of cocks, tits, and assholes on the edges of your monitors. Bye.

arnie666
08-15-2011, 10:44 PM
:Bowdown:

Please forgive me. I'm soooooooo sorry. It's not like your resident fascist alcoholics don't bring this bullshit up constantly on the GD section. You should really report me.

I'll let you do your thing undisturbed. In fact, I won't ever post in here again. I don't want to interrupt you intellectual heavy-weights from solving the world's problems on a shemale porn forum... with pics of cocks, tits, and assholes on the edges of your monitors. Bye.

PLEASE DON'T GO - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4fvI_E8GKY) :(


Nicole ,next time you want to indulge in a mutual wankathon pm me right.

End of the day she did start a legitmate thread about politics,some people here need to loosen up a bit. She just got a bit distracted when I posted,she wants me to give her one up the arse see.

Ben
08-15-2011, 10:51 PM
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/08/14/bachmann-on-gays-i-dont-judge-them/#.Tkf3KMiL5O8.

Homosexuality - is - part - of - Satan?!?!? Charming. She's a homophobe and a transphobe. And she should be taken to task on this issue.
Sadly, she has a pretty good shot at winning the nomination. Looking at the field of candidates on the Republican side for president, well, Mitt Romney looks like the best.... Meaning: the least extreme. But I could be wrong.

ANTI GAY BIGOT MICHELE BACHMANN BRAGS ABOUT BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE MINNESOTA BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Uq00Qm808)

arnie666
08-15-2011, 10:57 PM
Homosexuality - is - part - of - Satan?!?!? Charming. She's a homophobe and a transphobe. And she should be taken to task on this issue.
Sadly, she has a pretty good shot at winning the nomination. Looking at the field of candidates on the Republican side for president, well, Mitt Romney looks like the best.... Meaning: the least extreme. But I could be wrong.

ANTI GAY BIGOT MICHELE BACHMANN BRAGS ABOUT BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE MINNESOTA BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Uq00Qm808)

If Palin enters,she is out.Bachmann is Palin lite. Palin is a bit more moderate on Gay rights as well.That dyke feminist tammy bruce, talk show host is totally pushing her, and a bunch of Gays who supported Hillary claim they will push for Palin instead if she runs.

I think even if Palin doesn't enter Bachmann won't be the nominee.She did well in that first poll because it is bible thumping country. It will end up being between Romney and Perry in my opinion.

trish
08-15-2011, 11:53 PM
Bachmann = Palin = brianlite

Ben
08-16-2011, 12:40 AM
If Palin enters,she is out.Bachmann is Palin lite. Palin is a bit more moderate on Gay rights as well.That dyke feminist tammy bruce, talk show host is totally pushing her, and a bunch of Gays who supported Hillary claim they will push for Palin instead if she runs.

I think even if Palin doesn't enter Bachmann won't be the nominee.She did well in that first poll because it is bible thumping country. It will end up being between Romney and Perry in my opinion.

I don't think Palin enters the race. I could be wrong.
If it's Mitt Romney (again, probably the least extreme) then he'll pick Perry as his running mate. If it's Perry, well, who knows.
God! The thought of another Texas Republican in the White House makes my skin crawl -- ha ha ha!
Remember, Dwight Eisenhower used to be a member of the Party. What has happened to it? Well, it has been usurped by the crazies.

onmyknees
08-16-2011, 02:00 AM
That's your argument? You rest the defense of your views on what may have been a squeaky chair, or Barney Frank passing gas? Hey, just asking. LOL ROTFL AATOSYCTO

And what choir?? I didn't know conservatives were banned from this thread. Oh they aren't. Then nobody, including Nicole, could guarantee conservatives wouldn't read this thread. Consequently Nicole wasn't preaching to the choir. So there you go again OMK, making stupid ass assumptions that are patently ridiculous. And for what? Dramatic effect?

Oh come now Trish....I love to throw that degenerate Barney Frank in your faces no matter what the argument. He never disappoints !


Now into the your question about the "choir". Choir....(an organized group in concert in the same class or to sound in chorus or concert) Get it? This freak show ( and ND has tagged it far worse) called HA ain't exactly what I'd call mainstream America...political or otherwise. ...let's be honest for once. Even Ben acknowledged that the other day. The country is pretty evenly divided politically, although I'd urge you to check any of the polling companies and you'll find Americans who identify themselves as conservative on fiscal issues double those who identify themselves as liberal; or progressive. 70 % of Americans say they pray from time to time or attend services...try mentioning that in here...you'll be shunned as a religious fanatic. You wouldn't know that if you stopped into this shitfest for any length of time. Conversely in here it's 25-1 in favor of progressives. Hey I'm not whining about it....I actually like it that way...just answering your silly question. Silly because you surely knew that. People like to be part of the group think, and it's obvious on here. If you spend any amount of time in here, you might walk away jaded in the belief that the prevailing "wisdom" in here is pretty much the way most of America sees things....and sadly for you...it ain't...and I'm not talking about political affiliation....most Americans are far closer to the political middle than you, or me for that matter, and they're abundantly more fair than you..they may not vote for Palin or Bachmann but they don't think they're the incarnation of Lucifer either. So the violent reaction to Bachmann is because of her religious beliefs...do I have that right?

Well...Once you slash and burn Bachmann as a Nazi, for her religious beliefs, which admittedly are not mine, then you'll turn the long knives on Romney and suddenly his Mormon religion will come under scrutiny. Obama won't do it, after all...how could he point the finger after his dubious religious experience.....but you and the rest of his minions will. Then onto Rick Perry. And astonishingly all this from folks who support a guy that sat in Rev. Wright's church for 20 years and listened to his hate filled rants on everyone from Hillary to white folks, and when Obama meekly stated that he never heard any of that, you lost your intellectual curiosity along with the press, and simply took his word for it. Seems plausible he never heard any of that ....right? LMAO. Sure it does. Then riddle me this....how come once he became President he ditched the Rev and his worshipping habits faster than a street walker snatching up a tip? Now you can say Obama was smart enough not to get caught on tape espousing similar views to his religious mentor, but he did soak it in for 20 years. Should I post some of those You Tube vids to refresh you memory...lol ?

trish
08-16-2011, 02:48 AM
Dum-dum - dum - dum - dum.

Stavros
08-16-2011, 06:10 AM
70 % of Americans say they pray from time to time or attend services...try mentioning that in here...you'll be shunned as a religious fanatic (onmyknees)

One of the striking differences in the discourse of American politics when compared to Britain and most of (but not all of) continental Europe [eg Poland], is the need American candidates seem to have to make a public declaration of their faith; and in some cases to link it to social (even economic) policy.

In this country there was once a politician called Enoch Powell who claimed to pray every day and 'thank God for capitalism'; but he was a notorious eccentric. Here, most of the time, it is considered either unnecessary, or more likely a vote loser. Tony Blair was the most 'open' Christian politician in recent years, but even he kept it under wraps for most of his career: his Press Officer, Alastair Campbell once said : We don't do God. Blair was advised not to end a public speech on Iraq with the phrase God Bless You. When Blair on TV, after leaving No 10 said that of his record on Iraq he would be judged by 'a higher authority' most of us -part from squirming with embarrassment- took it as an insult, meaning: I don't care what the British people think of my foreign policy, and anyway they are not fit to judge me.
Blair being told to shut up about God is here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1429109/Campbell-interrupted-Blair-as-he-spoke-of-his-faith-We-dont-do-God.html

We rarely discuss religion in this segment of HA. As a personal issue I think it would be as nasty as some of the political debate, but possibly just uninteresting; but as a political issue I find it one of the most alarming aspects of America's political discourse. It would not normally matter to me what religion a candidate confesses to, thats his or her business. But if they then try and link their policy agenda to their faith, alarm bells start to ring.

The problem is that religion can shape small things in daily life, but on the basis of shared and absolute values. Religions offer a menu Prix Fixe not a la carte; just one of the many reasons history is on the side of those who separate the two. Politics, because it proceeds in democracies through debate, compromise and one hopes, the review of results which then produce change and amendment, cannot be shaped to absolute values or moral strictures and be consistent with the religion all of the time. Would it mean, for example, that social policy can only be framed in accordance with religious belief, and how would that fit with constitutional law? And, if the law satisfied the Religious demands of legislators but was then shown not to work or be effective, it would have to be because the law was badly implemented, because -and I think this is crucial- the religion cannot be wrong. You end up with laws that conform to the religious beliefs of legislators, regardless of their ability to work in daily life; in other words, bad law; but would, I assume, satisfy religious legislators that they were, nevertheless, doing 'God's work'. As destructive as Shari'a law has been in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan, to take three dreadful examples (but with a parallel with a contentious issue such as 'God's law' in the USA).

For these reasons I wonder if this religious stuff is rhetoric, and only rhetoric.

In reality, would a President Bachmann or Romney or Perry would refuse to sign a bill into law because it did not meet his or her Christian requirements as a 'just law'? It would mean that the will of the people expressed in Congress would be nullified by the President's religious beliefs: in theory any Christian President who opposed abortion at any level, or same-sex marriages, could veto the bill for his or her personal religious reasons.

There have been opportunities for Presidents in the past to do this, but as far as I know it hasn't happened. Dick Cheney said the USA invaded Iraq to change the regime because it was 'doable' as well as being politically advantageous to the USA (which in fact it wasn't but lets not get lost in that debate here); Bush is said to have claimed it was because the USA needed to do something about 'Gog and Magog' doing bad things in the Middle East...did Bush really shape his policy on Iraq in accordance with his religious beliefs? He was not the only decision-maker on Iraq, so I don't know how this can be verified one way or the other.

And so, if it really is just rhetoric, why don't they just shut up about it?

trish
08-16-2011, 06:46 AM
Rather than taking the Bible as a menu Prix Fixe, our brand of zealot over here pick, choose and interpret to their liking, even the ones who claim to read the Bible literally. The only menu Prix Fixe is the periodic cycle of weekly talking points which you can hear repeated ad nauseum by pundits and politicians all over cable news, the amplitude modulated spectrum and the internet blogs. It's a mystery reams of "God's word" can be happily twisted or ignored, but for some reason we have to stick to the hoary old testament when it comes to homosexuality, evolution, stem cell research (??) and women's rights. The inconsistency here is astounding. Rather than being ruled by the Bible, American Christians are hung up on issues they have yet to deal with and they're using the Bible as an excuse to efface their own confusion.

hippifried
08-16-2011, 07:50 AM
Rather than taking the Bible as a menu Prix Fixe, our brand of zealot over here pick, choose and interpret to their liking, even the ones who claim to read the Bible literally. The only menu Prix Fixe is the periodic cycle of weekly talking points which you can hear repeated ad nauseum by pundits and politicians all over cable news, the amplitude modulated spectrum and the internet blogs. It's a mystery reams of "God's word" can be happily twisted or ignored, but for some reason we have to stick to the hoary old testament when it comes to homosexuality, evolution, stem cell research (??) and women's rights. The inconsistency here is astounding. Rather than being ruled by the Bible, American Christians are hung up on issues they have yet to deal with and they're using the Bible as an excuse to efface their own confusion.
Sooooo...
They're all a couple tacos light of a combination plate?

arnie666
08-16-2011, 08:47 AM
I don't think Palin enters the race. I could be wrong.
If it's Mitt Romney (again, probably the least extreme) then he'll pick Perry as his running mate. If it's Perry, well, who knows.
God! The thought of another Texas Republican in the White House makes my skin crawl -- ha ha ha!
Remember, Dwight Eisenhower used to be a member of the Party. What has happened to it? Well, it has been usurped by the crazies.

I think what sarah Palin is doing, is not entering the race and watching the media go after those who have declared. And thinning the field out for her. I also thing she is doing this so her rivals spend themselves out . She also unlike some of the other candidates doesn't need to enter early,so the media and member of the public get to know her. She is the most vetted candidate and the most widely talked about candidate for the republican nomination there ever was if she runs.

I personally think Bachmann will be finished before Palin announces. It was a DNC analyst who worked for the Obama campaign who said Palin had the best political instincts he had ever seen and warned the left on some lefty network ,I think it was mscbc that he thinks she will announce nov or dec so money is spent not just by her rivals on others but also that the democratic party machines spends all their money on her rivals. We all know how much money Obama will be putting up for his re-election.She will know this.I think if she gets the nomination she will try and get marco rubio as her VP.

Helvis2012
08-29-2011, 04:15 AM
And she's the star of the party.

Nicole Dupre
08-30-2011, 07:03 PM
That's right. The earthquake and hurricane were OUR fault. God's letting us know what horrible sodomites we are.

Thanks for setting the record straight, you bug-eyed faghag slut.

And thanks for sending James, your big fat retarded buck-toothed homo $100 hooker, to HA to endorse you.

Oh, sweet baby Jesus. Please zap James' 6.5" rancid cock with a lightning bolt to thank him for sucking trucker dicks, and providing everyone with an example of why we are now being punished. His fat inbred ass is totally fine with it, as he's a masochist in a crooked wig who's honored by such a shit-eating experience.

And Nicole, the Whore of Babylon, will do her part to cheer on Lucifer, the Lord of Bright Lights and Ass-Fucking, that we may know the depths to which we've fallen from your sadistic and monopolistic grace.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/30/michele-bachmann-hurricane-earthquake_n_941679.html

russtafa
08-30-2011, 10:39 PM
yes the liberal socialist choir of Americans who wouldn't know the reality of socialism if smacked them in the face.Australia is one of the highest taxed countries in the world due to socialism and it is killing the working/middle class and creating a backlash which will bring the current government down

trish
08-30-2011, 10:50 PM
Q. How do you know if you've been brainwashed?

A. When you find yourself using phrases like ->
liberal socialist choir

russtafa
08-30-2011, 11:14 PM
wow that easy lol

russtafa
09-01-2011, 02:50 AM
Q. How do you know if you've been brainwashed?

A. When you find yourself using phrases like ->what other word would you use for lunatics from the left.The Australian government would love you lot because they are crazy and would welcome all the nut jobs they can get

trish
09-01-2011, 03:11 AM
Haven't you noticed the left never speaks or sings together as does a choir. The left is a big tent and they're on over the place on issues. Its the right wing politicians and pundits who follow a conductor and repeat in unison and verbatim the talking points of the week. Now there's a choir.

russtafa
09-01-2011, 03:18 AM
yes but not lunatics like the left who come up with the craziest ideas which fail time after time and can't figure out what went wrong?

trish
09-01-2011, 03:23 AM
you must mean crazy ideas like trickle down economics

Erika1487
09-01-2011, 04:39 AM
Nicole, the Whore of Babylon, will do her part to cheer on Lucifer, the Lord of Bright Lights and Ass-Fucking, that we may know the depths to which we've fallen from your sadistic and monopolistic grace.

LMAO :iagree: 100%

russtafa
09-01-2011, 07:44 AM
That's evil