Has the "transsexual porn phenomena" peaked?

[Bobzz]

My impression is that the interest in and enthusiasm for transsexual porn has generally peaked. I don't think it's for lack of talent or beauty, I simply suspect that the genre is unable to attract new fans. The number of transsexual films produced each year seems to be on the decline (presumably, reflecting demand). Some transsexual "stars" have even become more mainstream and media darlings of sorts (e.g. Candice Cayne, Yasmine Lee, Allanah Starr, Sunny Delight, Jennifer Paris, just to name a few) but my sense is that the "bloom is off the rose", so to speak, for transsexual porn. For me, transsexual porn and sex has become just as exciting / boring as any other type of porn and sex.

Does anyone else feel the same way?

[BellaBellucci]

HQ to Franklin. Come in Franklin. :?

~BB~

[BigDF]

HQ to Franklin. Come in Franklin. :?

~BB~Aw, geez Bella, come on now. Don't feed the troll:dancing:

[Bobzz]

Hey, I was being serious. Just asking a question for fuck's sake.

[giovanni_hotel]

Porn is the visual expression of the biological sexual urge. It's instinctive, up there with the evolutionary impulse to seek food and shelter. It doesn't 'peak'.

Because your libido for trannies is shrinking doesn't mean it's a waning global trend.

It's normal for old men as they develop ED from hardened arteries to lose interest in sex.

Don't fight it. Embrace the change, pops.

[Bobzz]

Great, now I have another asshole on my tail. Fuck ya's all, I'll just delete the thread. Maybe what I find boring is the lack of fucking intelligent discourse here.

[Nicole Dupre]

I think it's fantastic that we have a niche in porn, just like any of the others. It validates us to a degree. But let's face it. If that's the ceiling for how much the general public will embrace us, we'll never get taken seriously. But porn was, and continues to be, important for us. It's now an undeniable fact; trannys turn on straight guys.

[Bobzz]

I know I'll probably regret this (I'm kidding, right?) but "thank you, Nicole". That was my point stated in a somewhat different way.

[Yeah]

I don't think it has peaked. Look at the girls getting asked to do mainstream stuff like Yasmin Lee, by the way Yasmin rocked in Hangover 2. now a million other guys who never saw a tgirl are going to be checking out tgirl porn.

[Merkurie]

The "shock value" may have peaked.

[Bobzz]

Perhaps more like "rush factor" ?

[BellaBellucci]

The "shock value" may have peaked.

I'm not sure that's entirely true but it's certainly moving in that direction, thank Gods.

~BB~

[Heather Moorland]

Transgender people have allways been a part of the sex industry and will allways be. And I do not only mean since 1972. In 17'th centrury England there was the molly-houses where men came to have sex with male prostitutes dressed as women (they was later baned though). In 13'th century england there was trans gender prostitution, acording to court records and even bishops is soppose to have been the johns in those days. In Arabia at the time of prophet mohammed there was transgender prostitutes called "Mukhanatun". In antiquity there was religious cults to severel goddesses that fetured transgender prostitution. I India the Hidras has maintaind a tradition of secret (and not so sacret) prostitution to this day.
When you look at world history, prostitution is one of the ways that was open to transgendered people to make a living along with other forms of intertainment. Even in places such as the christian middle ages where it was forbidden. Probably because there was a demand for it.
So transgender peoples involvement in the sex industry has not "peaked". It will allways be there.

[Jericho]

Maybe what I find boring is the lack of fucking intelligent discourse here.

Surely not! :wiggle:

[Jericho]

Maybe saturated but, I don't know about peaked. :shrug

[Prospero]

Transgender people have allways been a part of the sex industry and will allways be. And I do not only mean since 1972. In 17'th centrury England there was the molly-houses where men came to have sex with male prostitutes dressed as women (they was later baned though). In 13'th century england there was trans gender prostitution, acording to court records and even bishops is soppose to have been the johns in those days. In Arabia at the time of prophet mohammed there was transgender prostitutes called "Mukhanatun". In antiquity there was religious cults to severel goddesses that fetured transgender prostitution. I India the Hidras has maintaind a tradition of secret (and not so sacret) prostitution to this day.
When you look at world history, prostitution is one of the ways that was open to transgendered people to make a living along with other forms of intertainment. Even in places such as the christian middle ages where it was forbidden. Probably because there was a demand for it.
So transgender peoples involvement in the sex industry has not "peaked". It will allways be there.

Fascinating stuff Heather.... and I certainly had NO idea about the transgendered tradition in Arabia. Presumably under Islam this was swept away - or at least under the carpet - after the Hejira?. There is of course quite a thirst for transgendered girls across the Middle East today. But punishments for it can also be pretty heinous.

I don't think it has peaked -or started to whither.

[toopretty]

I think it's fantastic that we have a niche in porn, just like any of the others. It validates us to a degree. But let's face it. If that's the ceiling for how much the general public will embrace us, we'll never get taken seriously. But porn was, and continues to be, important for us. It's now an undeniable fact; trannys turn on straight guys.

Trannys are ONLY for straight guys... there's nothing gay about it...

[Silcc69]

It will blow up once Tom Moore is gone.

[timxxx]

It won't peak until most people in world have the internet & a debt card,more & more people are getting online each year.

[TSPornFan]

Transsexual porn has no where near peaked. I am saying sorry ahead of time. I know this post will offend admirers and transsexuals.

There are too many non-passable and unattractive transsexual in transsexual porn. Most of these t-girls are new in their transitions. They're not ready to be models. Would a straight company shot a girl who is below grade A quality? It rarely happens in the straight business.

SMC has or had(Kelly Shore) most of the top models. The rest of the top transsexual pornstars are; Yasmin Lee, Jessica Host, Kelly Shore, Amy Daily, Hazel Turker, Quinn, Nelly, etc and a few others. I've heard a rumor that SMC will make Yasmin Lee's official site.

I would rather see every transsexual porn site ONLY film the attractive passable girls because they are the top models. Who would you rather see Kelly Shore or the majority of T-Girls Grooby shoots?

A major issue I have is transvestite in transsexual porn. When I pay for transsexual then I expect to see a transsexual not a transvestite. The two niches should never mix with one another. I feel lied to by companies when they shoot cross dressers instead of transsexuals. It's cheating the consumers.

Secondly SMC is really fucking things up with the stream only mess. I am not going to pay a company to only allow me to stream movies. There are too many factors involved such as internet connection, membership area staying online, SMC's servers, etc.

Does anyone remember Giselle Milani? She had a site with SMC. This was SMC's first stream site. It is no longer online. The site had awful traffic.

Let's look Shemale Strokers. This site has better video quality than all of Grooby's sites. However, the owners and directors do not know who to shoot. They are always looking for new girls who are mostly not passable nor attractive. The good thing about Strokers is the quality and settings. It could easily be a good site if attractive T-Girls were shot. Read their forums to find out more.

TS Seduction is a hit and miss. The quality is the best in transsexual porn. However, some weeks the scenes are awful. The next week the scene is great.

Let's not forget Devil's Films. This company does shoot attractive transsexuals. However, it also shoots non-passable transsexuals.

[Teydyn]

There are too many non-passable and unattractive transsexual in transsexual porn.
passable != attractive
You should know that, having fapped to, erm... researched TS porn that much.


I would rather see every transsexual porn site ONLY film the attractive passable girls because they are the top models.Thats you. There are people with different tastes.


Who would you rather see Kelly Shore or the majority of T-Girls Grooby shoots?Different answer then to the question: "Would you rather see 1) Kelly Shore in 20 clips or 2) her in just a few and additional, diverse girls?"


Secondly SMC is really fucking things up with the stream only mess. I am not going to pay a company to only allow me to stream movies.Then dont. If enough people leave, they will rethink this step. And with you loving research so much, do a bit of it on how to download streams. Not that hard for 99% of all sites.


Let's not forget Devil's Films. This company does shoot attractive transsexuals. However, it also shoots non-passable transsexuals.Which often enough can be the same person.

[TSPornFan]

passable != attractive
You should know that, having fapped to, erm... researched TS porn that much.

Thats you. There are people with different tastes.

Different answer then to the question: "Would you rather see 1) Kelly Shore in 20 clips or 2) her in just a few and additional, diverse girls?"

Then dont. If enough people leave, they will rethink this step. And with you loving research so much, do a bit of it on how to download streams. Not that hard for 99% of all sites.

Which often enough can be the same person.

I never said passable means attractive. I said sites should only shoot attractive and passable t-girls.

I suggest you do some research. Look at the highest ranked girls on sites that feature a ranking system. The majority of them are passable and attractive.

I would rather see Kelly Shore in 20 clips than seeing non-passable t-girls. I demand for the best.

[timxxx]

Would a straight company shot a girl who is below grade A quality? It rarely happens in the straight business.


Wrong,happens quite a lot,depends on what your fetish is,if you're into big tits,then all that matters are the tits are 'grade A quality' .
Miosotis,April McKenzie,Milena Velba are not exactly 'grade A quality' in terms of looks.
I would say 98% of all women between ages 18 & 40 could get a paying porn gig.

[TSPornFan]

Wrong,happens quite a lot,depends on what your fetish is,if you're into big tits,then all that matters are the tits are 'grade A quality' .
Miosotis,April McKenzie,Milena Velba are not exactly 'grade A quality' in terms of looks.
I would say 98% of all women between ages 18 & 40 could get a paying porn gig.

You're dead wrong about the big tits niche. Look at the current big tit sites. They mostly feature grade A women. Just go to Brazzers and Naughty America.

I should had been more clear. The top companies rarely shoot someone who isn't Grade A quality.

Are there ugly women in porn? Sure, but that normally happens in unpopular niches.

[theone1982]

It will never peak, just like how other types of porn will never peak, because there is always a generation of people coming up who haven't seen it before, and they will get into it. The only thing that will get rid of porn as we know it, is when it becomes fully interactive. Just look at the kissing robots being built in Japan, once you have a robot that you can, for lack of a better word, screw, you won't have any need to watch porn, and the only people who will then are those that can't afford the robot. Seriously, when they perfect the sex robot, it will be like when the first cavewoman said "Hey I can charge men to have sex with me!" It will completely revolutionize the adult business. Transsexual porn will still be there, you'll just have people ordering their robot with the dick attachment.:)

[robertlouis]

I'm not sure that's entirely true but it's certainly moving in that direction, thank Gods.

~BB~

:iagree::iagree::iagree:

As very often happens, BB gets it dead right. It's the move towards wider social acceptance of the lifestyle and transgenderism in general which enables a wider audience for the porn.

[robertlouis]

it will be like when the first cavewoman said "Hey I can charge men to have sex with me!" .:)

And there you have it - the birth of capitalism. :geek:

[theone1982]

And there you have it - the birth of capitalism. :geek:

The opposite would be the communist sex farm. Everyone gets to have sex with a woman once a year, all paid for by the state. For some people that's much less sex, for others, much, much more!:)

[robertlouis]

The opposite would be the communist sex farm. Everyone gets to have sex with a woman once a year, all paid for by the state. For some people that's much less sex, for others, much, much more!:)

And this is that woman!

[theone1982]

And this is that woman!

"Tear down this wall, and, dammit, get some sexier women!"

[BellaBellucci]

Let's not forget Devil's Films. This company does shoot attractive transsexuals. However, it also shoots non-passable transsexuals.


Which often enough can be the same person.

A-fucking-men and certainly not limited to Devil's. :Bowdown:

~BB~

[Merkurie]

"Tear down this wall, and, dammit, get some sexier women!"

Well they did tear down the wall and lo and behold they were hoarding millions of beautiful women behind the iron curtain.
Damn Commies.

[theone1982]

Well they did tear down the wall and lo and behold they were hoarding millions of beautiful women behind the iron curtain.
Damn Commies.

Lol! This is true! I hear people can even receive their women in the mail these days!:)

[Merkurie]

Lol! This is true! I hear people can even receive their women in the mail these days!:)

Ugly Eastern girls are like supermodels in the West!
I saw it on the internet.

[robertlouis]

Lol! This is true! I hear people can even receive their women in the mail these days!:)

Huh, that's nothing. I downloaded two Ukrainian girls and a Filipina just last week. :jerkoff

[CaptainPlanet]

My impression is that the interest in and enthusiasm for transsexual porn has generally peaked. I don't think it's for lack of talent or beauty, I simply suspect that the genre is unable to attract new fans. The number of transsexual films produced each year seems to be on the decline (presumably, reflecting demand). Some transsexual "stars" have even become more mainstream and media darlings of sorts (e.g. Candice Cayne, Yasmine Lee, Allanah Starr, Sunny Delight, Jennifer Paris, just to name a few) but my sense is that the "bloom is off the rose", so to speak, for transsexual porn. For me, transsexual porn and sex has become just as exciting / boring as any other type of porn and sex.

Does anyone else feel the same way?

My impression is, that your bored!

[tsparisangelline]

Transsexual?

You mean drag...

[robertlouis]

Transsexual?

You mean drag...

We're not all into guys in wigs, Paris. Some of us like ultra-fem girls who tend to look like you. What's your problem?

[BigDF]

Huh, that's nothing. I downloaded two Ukrainian girls and a Filipina just last week. :jerkoffThe internet gives a whole new meaning to mail order brides!:dancing:

[TSPornFan]

We're not all into guys in wigs, Paris. Some of us like ultra-fem girls who tend to look like you. What's your problem?

Sometimes this forum feels like a drag queen forum considering that most members go crazy for men in wigs.

[Willie Escalade]

Sometimes this forum feels like a drag queen forum considering that most members go crazy for men in wigs.
I feel ya! I don't know how anyone can find these dudes in wigs attractive...

[aprilian]

t's now an undeniable fact; trannys turn on straight guys.

Guilty... As charged

[Mayrah]

I feel ya! I don't know how anyone can find these dudes in wigs attractive...


Hahah, good example. :wiggle:

[FreddieGomez]

it does appear to be over saturated now.

[TSPornFan]

I feel ya! I don't know how anyone can find these dudes in wigs attractive...

I was referring to many members going crazy for cross-dressers and transvestite. The people who posted pictures of aren't transsexuals?

[TSPornFan]

I think the main issue with transsexual porn is that there is NO mega company nor network. Look at straight porn for a second. Straight porn has many mega companies and networks such as Brazzers, Naughty America, Bangbros, Reality Kings, Hustler, etc. Gay porn has Suit 703 and it is owned by Naughty America.

There are ZERO porn networks for American transsexuals. Buying American transsexual porn is much more expensive than straight and gay porn. You also get less hardcore content than straight and gay porn.

Transsexual porn needs a mega company like Brazzers or Naughty America to make a transsexual porn network only starring American Transsexuals.

[Teydyn]

that most members go crazy for men in wigs.
SOME do.
MOST others accept their preferences, even though they dont think so themselves.


The people who posted pictures of aren't transsexuals?Pretty & feminine looking doesnt equal TS. Maybe they are, maybe they arent.


Transsexual porn needs a mega company like Brazzers or Naughty America to make a transsexual porn network only starring American Transsexuals.
So you want world class TS, american only, for cheap?

I want someone to give me a million euro and i dont think my chances are that far worse then yours :D

[TSPornFan]

So you want world class TS, american only, for cheap?

I want someone to give me a million euro and i dont think my chances are that far worse then yours :D

Straight Companies can afford to offer cheap prices. Brazzers has over 100,000 members. It can afford to be cheap and have the best women in the business star in movies. Straight companies know how to promote girls to lure new members and keep loyal members.

[pantybulge69]

Transgender people have allways been a part of the sex industry and will allways be. And I do not only mean since 1972. In 17'th centrury England there was the molly-houses where men came to have sex with male prostitutes dressed as women (they was later baned though). In 13'th century england there was trans gender prostitution, acording to court records and even bishops is soppose to have been the johns in those days. When you look at world history, prostitution is one of the ways that was open to transgendered people to make a living along with other forms of intertainment. Even in places such as the christian middle ages where it was forbidden. Probably because there was a demand for it.
So transgender peoples involvement in the sex industry has not "peaked". It will allways be there.


sex industry and porn industry two different animals in this sense of the
discussion.
true that sex-prostitution been around for centuries., but if we're talkin' actual porn industry where you see it on video,on demand,online,etc. to those who take curiousity to it ( men, women, couples) then thats where i think the peak of TS porn can be brought up.
i think it starts with experiencing TS porn, drag shows and translates to
the escorting-prostitution biz.

[robertlouis]

sex industry and porn industry two different animals in this sense of the
discussion.
true that sex-prostitution been around for centuries., but if we're talkin' actual porn industry where you see it on video,on demand,online,etc. to those who take curiousity to it ( men, women, couples) then thats where i think the peak of TS porn can be brought up.
i think it starts with experiencing TS porn, drag shows and translates to
the escorting-prostitution biz.

Porn is essentially a voyeuristic approach to sex, so in terms of visual stimuli via pictorial representations or verbal descriptions of sexual activity, porn has been around for as long as books have been written. Porn in moving images via film and arcade machines etc has been around for just over 100 years, but there are certainly no grounds for claiming that it started as an industry only when video became available in the 70s and 80s.

[GroobySteven]

straight companies can afford to offer cheap prices. Brazzers has over 100,000 members. It can afford to be cheap and have the best women in the business star in movies. Straight companies know how to promote girls to lure new members and keep loyal members.


you know nothing about the industry whatsoever.

All bollocks.

[TSPornFan]

you know nothing about the industry whatsoever.

All bollocks.

Are you jealous? Let's be real and state the facts. Straight porn is cheaper than transsexual porn. Straight porn has a larger consumer base and the mega sites have way more members than any transsexual site.

Shemale Yum is $34.99 a month.

Brazzers is $19.99 a month.

This is also a weak economy. Transsexual porn cannot peak when it is the most expensive porn to buy.

Let's also look at Parodies. Straight porn has good quality parodies. The first transsexual parody This Isn't Ugly Betty was awful because out of the four scenes, only one had anything to do with Ugly Betty. The other scenes were recycled scenes from past Brazilain DVDs and one random gonzo scene. You never see BS like this in straight porn today.

Striaght porn standards are always raising. While transsexual porn's standards have barely changed.

[GroobySteven]

Are you jealous? Let's be real and state the facts. Straight porn is cheaper than transsexual porn. Straight porn has a larger consumer base and the mega sites have way more members than any transsexual site.

Shemale Yum is $34.99 a month.

Brazzers is $19.99 a month.

This is also a weak economy. Transsexual porn cannot peak when it is the most expensive porn to buy.

Let's also look at Parodies. Straight porn has good quality parodies. The first transsexual parody This Isn't Ugly Betty was awful because out of the four scenes, only one had anything to do with Ugly Betty. The other scenes were recycled scenes from past Brazilain DVDs and one random gonzo scene. You never see BS like this in straight porn today.

Striaght porn standards are always raising. While transsexual porn's standards have barely changed.


Jealous of whom, you? Hmmm - no.

You are trying to equate Brazzers which isn't only "straight" porn site, it's an all encompassing porn site that doesn't focus on one niche in the mainstream, with a smallish niche like "transsexual". It doesn't have any relation?

Brazzers can afford to charge less (I think it's $24.99) than niched sites as they do have a larger amount of customers with the same outgoings, it's simple economics, whether transsexual porn has "peaked" or not is irrelevant to your argument. You cannot compare the two.

Transsexual porn is by far not the most expensive porn, there are loads of cheap transsexual sites and DVD's that you can join and other niches are about the same prices. Nobody is forcing you to pay, a company like ours has worked out the economics needed to make a site work, reducing the price would not bring in enough new sales to make the budget work.

What has a "parody" got to do with anything? Who gives a fuck? There are plenty of TS productions released in terms of market share, there might even be more than other niches. There is plenty of mainstream content which is shit also.

I fail to see how transsexual porn standards have "barely changed" in comparison to the mainstream market? As PART OF the same industry, they have changed with it?

Your moaning and pissing into the wind, issues are just pointless. You do offer some good feedback some of the time but the rest of it, where YOU actually think you know about the industry and try to equate apples to oranges, is just a waste of time and complete crap.

[GroobySteven]

My impression is that the interest in and enthusiasm for transsexual porn has generally peaked. I don't think it's for lack of talent or beauty, I simply suspect that the genre is unable to attract new fans. The number of transsexual films produced each year seems to be on the decline (presumably, reflecting demand). Some transsexual "stars" have even become more mainstream and media darlings of sorts (e.g. Candice Cayne, Yasmine Lee, Allanah Starr, Sunny Delight, Jennifer Paris, just to name a few) but my sense is that the "bloom is off the rose", so to speak, for transsexual porn. For me, transsexual porn and sex has become just as exciting / boring as any other type of porn and sex.

Does anyone else feel the same way?


YES and NO.

Has the porn phenomena peaked? I'd say it's plateau'd for sure.
15 yrs ago with hardly any content available on the internet those intereted in transsexual porn were eager and excited to grab anything they could find and willing to pay for it. This continued for a while (we were lucky to be in early and build early) until other companies who didn't specialize in the niche, saw the financial opportunity and it became a "goldrush". Cheap generic product attached to micro-niched websites which promised exactly what that member wanted but then led into a "mega-site" which never updated in the specific micro-niche the customer joined.

Here is an article I wrote in 2010 for Xbiz about it if you wish to read more.
http://www.xbiz.com/articles/127037/steven+gallon

This created a glut of content.

So it's 2011. The amount of people joining the internet has slowed (I don't have the figures on this) and the amount of people enjoying free porn has increased. I wouldn't judge the amount of DVD's getting released as an indication of whether it's peaked, the DVD industry is dying rapidly. I'd look at the amount of scenes getting produced worldwide as a better indication and yes, there are less now than a few years ago (however, I expect there are a lot more American scenes now than 5 yrs ago, but less Brazil, Argie, Thai, Filipino, etc.).

This can be attributed to the two points above but also to the fact, which is what I think you were getting at, is that most people, who have access to the internet AND are into transsexuals or have a potential interest, have already been presented with that content.

So the rapid growth of the genre didn't so much reach a peak but a plateau of where transsexual porn isn't so much a phenomena but part of the mainstream porn niches. Productions continue to happen, new models come along which continue to titillate and excite even those like myself, who've been looking at content for 15+ yrs, new websites are built and like the whole porn industry, it continues to evolve looking for new avenues, revenue streams and projects.

[TSPornFan]

Jealous of whom, you? Hmmm - no.

You are trying to equate Brazzers which isn't only "straight" porn site, it's an all encompassing porn site that doesn't focus on one niche in the mainstream, with a smallish niche like "transsexual". It doesn't have any relation?

Brazzers can afford to charge less (I think it's $24.99) than niched sites as they do have a larger amount of customers with the same outgoings, it's simple economics, whether transsexual porn has "peaked" or not is irrelevant to your argument. You cannot compare the two.

Transsexual porn is by far not the most expensive porn, there are loads of cheap transsexual sites and DVD's that you can join and other niches are about the same prices. Nobody is forcing you to pay, a company like ours has worked out the economics needed to make a site work, reducing the price would not bring in enough new sales to make the budget work.

What has a "parody" got to do with anything? Who gives a fuck? There are plenty of TS productions released in terms of market share, there might even be more than other niches. There is plenty of mainstream content which is shit also.

I fail to see how transsexual porn standards have "barely changed" in comparison to the mainstream market? As PART OF the same industry, they have changed with it?

Your moaning and pissing into the wind, issues are just pointless. You do offer some good feedback some of the time but the rest of it, where YOU actually think you know about the industry and try to equate apples to oranges, is just a waste of time and complete crap.

Brazzers does have a niche- Big Tits. Over 90% of their films feature big titty women. It has always been their main niche.

Brazzers isn't the only straight site. Naughty America, Bangbros, and Reality King are cheaper than transsexual sites.

What I meant by cheaper is that the American straight sites that are active are cheaper than the active American and Brazilian transsexual sites.

I didn't take into account DVDs. DVDs are the past for porn. In my opinion I think porn companies should focus on online porn sites. Online porn is cheaper than producing many DVDs.

My point about the parody is about the overall quality of porn. Straight porn provides much better quality than transsexual porn. Most transsexual porn companies in the US are way behind in quality. The movies are still watchable, but they don't look great.

It's true that no one is forcing me to pay. I never made comment to that. I don't have a problem supporting companies that shoot American transsexuals. At least I get what I want some of the time when signing up for sites. I can remember times when I didn't download anything for a month from TS Seduction because their damn director Tomcat has made that site go downhill with very few great scenes to watch.

[GroobySteven]

Brazzers isn't the only straight site. Naughty America, Bangbros, and Reality King are cheaper than transsexual sites.

They are cheaper because they can appeal to a larger amount of people while keeping the budgets pretty much the same. The transsexual niche (the BBW niche, the Asian niche, the Interracial niche, the Bukkake niche, etc, etc.) have much smaller prospective market than the companies you mention. If we had 100,000 potential members I could increase the amount of content AND lower the price - but we just don't have that many "potential" members. There is only so many people out there interested in buying TS porn and within that, many want different things. We compete with other sites/companies to get those members and sales but it's not limitless.


Let's not forget that Brazzers also are one of the main reasons the porn industry is in trouble, they also own many of the tube sites that are happy to steal content from other companies to promote their own sites.

[BellaBellucci]

Wow! The presumptuous arguing with the narcissistic! You can't buy tickets to a show like this! :dancing:

http://gentlepurespace.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/retarded-children-benefit-show-tickets.jpg

You're both right about things and wrong about things but none of it matters because the one of you who could do something about it is more than happy with the status quo because it feeds his ego and his wallet. :geek:

~BB~

[callahac]

Trannys are ONLY for straight guys... there's nothing gay about it...

That's not necessarily true- I would consider myself pretty much gay, but also dig trannys a lot.

[timxxx]

That's not necessarily true- I would consider myself pretty much gay, but also dig trannys a lot.
That's a new one on me,Do you like(like to fuck) girls ?

[callahac]

That's a new one on me,Do you like(like to fuck) girls ?

It's ok, I do it, I'm married after all. Much rather suck cock or get fucked in the ass.