PDA

View Full Version : Barbacking Badly Needed in American TS Porn



Mr. Sinister
06-05-2010, 01:55 AM
I just finished watching a European transsexual porno. The European transsexual, who was a hot blond, did all her scenes BAREBACK. She fucked a male, and got fucked by a male without any use of condoms. She allowed ass to mouth and actually let the male ejaculate on her cock. She then proceeded to use his cum as lubricant as she stroked her cock until she blew her load.

I have watched American transsexual porn quite a bit and have noticed that many tgirls refuse to do bareback. The videos and shoots that Kimber James has done bareback are so hot! Why isn't shemale porn in America completely bareback? Most GG porn is bareback and female stars seem to love a man's cum. I have rarely ever seen a tgirl in America swallow a man's cum on camera and have never seen Ass to Mouth. Most American tgirls seem afraid of a man's cum. The most famous man in shemale porn, Christian, seems to love barebacking tgirls and usually barebacks when he does films with GGs.

Ron Jeremy said it best when asked if condoms would ever be used on a regular basis in GG porn, "Porn is a fantasy and condoms ruin that fantasty." Until I start seeing more bareback in American films, I would much rather watch a European, Asian, or Brazilian film where the actors are willing to do bareback.

Watch a bareback flick vs. one where condoms are used. There is a huge difference in quality and performance. Barebacking films are simply the best! Remember, porn is about creating a sexy fantasy that is as real as possible for the viewer.

bellamy
06-05-2010, 02:08 AM
Well I'm sure I don't speak for all American performers but the cost of losing you as a view probably won't sway them if they don't already.....

Schimmel
06-05-2010, 02:22 AM
http://www.andreanobiliproductions.com/tgp/gallery.php?idf=56&type=v&ccr=2115008&pr=vhg

TSPornFan
06-05-2010, 02:37 AM
STDs are a huge problem in the TS community. I am sure this is the number one reason why.

I have no problems with performers doing this as long as all performers are tested before the shot.

serial138
06-05-2010, 12:19 PM
I would rather see the girls stay healthy and keep making the movies that we all love rather than see bareback videos. While yes, I do enjoy them and always fantasize about what it must be like, I prefer that all the girls stay healthy so we can keep doing all those wonderful kinky things.

saintpatrick
06-05-2010, 09:38 PM
Remember, porn is about creating a sexy fantasy that is as real as possible for the viewer.

And all professional athletes should be required to use performance enhancing drugs and all gunfight scenes in action movies should be done with live ammo. It's all about making the fantasy real for the viewer, right?

TheGuard
06-05-2010, 10:47 PM
Never understood the allure of bare-backing, without intending to sound overly sycophantic I prefer everyone just stay safe.

CaptainPlanet
06-05-2010, 11:20 PM
STDs are a huge problem in the TS community. I am sure this is the number one reason why.

I have no problems with performers doing this as long as all performers are tested before the shot.

The community is so small, why would STD's pose a problem when the actors are getting tested anyways right?

Also i see BBBJ in every TS porn with condoms, so what makes that any different?

TSPornFan
06-06-2010, 12:13 AM
I would like to add an interesting thought for all of you.

The TS Girls give the guys blowjobs when they are not wearing condoms and vice versa. So wearing a condom only during anal is not any good because they already had unprotected oral sex.

Just give that a thought.

TheGuard
06-06-2010, 12:22 AM
It's hard to take anything you say seriously because right next to your words Mario is sucking off Princess Peach. :)

CaptainPlanet
06-06-2010, 12:50 AM
It's hard to take anything you say seriously because right next to your words Mario is sucking off Princess Peach. :)

your reading to hard maybe, he only stated the obvious

sucka4chix
06-06-2010, 12:51 AM
This has been beat to death in the old forum. Like I said then, if there's some difference in TSes that make them tend to catch more diseases people need to tell us. I hate so much to see a scene with a GG a guy and a TS and it's all bareback until the TS gets involved. And you people who have porn morals make me laugh!

TheGuard
06-06-2010, 01:05 AM
porn morals or empathy for another human being?

fred41
06-06-2010, 03:20 AM
Actually there is a vast difference between BBBJ and unprotected anal sex.

sucka4chix
06-06-2010, 03:32 AM
What empathy? Please wear a condom while you fuck those fifteen guys and get sodomized while wearing a habit!
Is this right wing extremist porn (sin with a heart)? You watch porn made by companies called Devil's films etc., but you want them to be sweet! I get it--- it's Green porn. Pa-lease! It's fucking porn!

sucka4chix
06-06-2010, 03:35 AM
Actually there is a vast difference between BBBJ and unprotected anal sex.
The point is there seems to be a difference between unprotected anal sex with a GG which is rampant, and unprotected anal sex with a TS.

fred41
06-06-2010, 08:52 AM
The point is there seems to be a difference between unprotected anal sex with a GG which is rampant, and unprotected anal sex with a TS.

Because statistically there IS a difference.

sucka4chix
06-06-2010, 03:21 PM
Because statistically there IS a difference.

So do your PSA, and tell us what the difference is, statistically. Maybe TS porn should be banned, if they are carriers of diseases at a significantly higher rate than everyone else. Give me the ammo and I'll call my congressman.

jniowa
06-06-2010, 04:19 PM
the fantasy of bareback is hot but the reality is not. it can be dangerous. i don't mind them all being safe.

Prospero
06-06-2010, 07:07 PM
re bareback oral and HIV... very very low risk according to medical profession. You'd have to have major lesions in mouth. Anal unprotected = Very High risk. I think that is the answer, isn't it. HIV may not kill anymore for certain but it does lower life expectancy and means a lifetime of expensive and unplesaant medication

sucka4chix
06-06-2010, 07:42 PM
re bareback oral and HIV... very very low risk according to medical profession. You'd have to have major lesions in mouth. Anal unprotected = Very High risk. I think that is the answer, isn't it. HIV may not kill anymore for certain but it does lower life expectancy and means a lifetime of expensive and unplesaant medication

No that is NOT the answer. If it was then all GG anal porn would be done with condoms! You guys are pussy-footing all around this topic. Seems to me what you want to say is TSes have a higher probability of having/spreading HIV; and AIDS is indeed a Gay disease and straight people have nothing to worry about!
Actually it seems a TS-only disease, because it's ok for a male performer, who surely does gay porn, to plow into a GG without a hat, but a TS has to wear a condom!
BTW, people have lesions in their mouths all the time.

Mr. Sinister
06-06-2010, 08:39 PM
The number one actor used in shemale porn in America is Christian. Most of the scenes he does with GGs are bareback. They are not afraid of getting a disease from him, but American shemales are?

Female stars will always allow facials, will swallow cum, and will either allow ass to mouth or pussy to mouth. These events never happen in shemale porn in America.

I wish some American Shemale porn company would start making bareback videos. As long as the actors get tested, there should not be any worries about STDs.

slinky
06-07-2010, 09:13 AM
From what I remember seeing, a fairly large percentage of the male and TG American talent have done bareback scenes, but it's not the percentage of talent that has done bareback is small, but the percentage of scenes/content which has been shot is small. That would lead me to believe that's it's more of a production/producer's decision than willingness of talent to to do so.