Poll: will there be white house indictments?

[chefmike]

Will there be white house indictments...on Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, or even Cheney?

[Overlord Abomination]

I don't care, I'm just here for the booty...

That was me

[chefmike]

so...harriet has withdrawn her supreme court nomination...

only our chimp-in-chief shrubya could be stupid enough...

to pick a nominee that both parties ridicule...

and yes...there will be indictments...

[Hara_Juku Tgirl]

I guess Maybe orrr maybe not..We shall just have to see what happens. :wink:

~Kisses.

HTG

[yourdaddy]

Old burgewr flipper is so cock sure. I wonder how he knows already. Nobody else does. He reminds me of why i left the dems back in 1996. Politics comes before their family, and their country.

[hondarobot]

I totally called it on Miers withdrawing! Haha! I really did, it's posted on here somewhere.

I bet Gonzales gets the next nomination. I could be wrong, but it's a hunch.

[yourdaddy]

I totalled called it on Miers withdrawing! Haha! I really did, it's posted on here somewhere.

I bet Gonzales gets the next nomination. I could be wrong, but it's a hunch.I think you're right robot. As long as he says he won't legislate from the bench like the liberal justices do, he may be the one.

[chefmike]

Old burgewr flipper is so cock sure. I wonder how he knows already. Nobody else does. He reminds me of why i left the dems back in 1996. Politics comes before their family, and their country.

LMFAOOOOOOO...before I go flip another burger... :lol: ...was it T Jefferson or someone else who said sumthing about dissent being the highest form of patriotism...are you sure you're not Rush Limbaugh emerging from the closet... and how's that oxycontin thing workin out for ya'?... :lol: don't brag about bein a dem..we're not proud of senator byrd either...a former klansmen...no doubt like yourself...

http://usera.imagecave.com/chefmike/bush.gif

[chefmike]

I totalled called it on Miers withdrawing! Haha! I really did, it's posted on here somewhere.

I bet Gonzales gets the next nomination. I could be wrong, but it's a hunch.I think you're right robot. As long as he says he won't legislate from the bench like the liberal justices do, he may be the one.

ah yes...gonzalez...shrubya's go-to guy in Texas...when he specialized in defending the chimps prediliction for executing retarded people...now has his sights set on eradicating porn...you could get hurt on both counts...porn...and the execution of retarded people... :lol:

[yourdaddy]

Old burgewr flipper is so cock sure. I wonder how he knows already. Nobody else does. He reminds me of why i left the dems back in 1996. Politics comes before their family, and their country.

LMFAOOOOOOO...before I go flip another burger... :lol: ...was it T Jefferson or someone else who said sumthing about dissent being the highest form of patriotism...are you sure you're not Rush Limbaugh emerging from the closet... and how's that oxycontin thing workin out for ya'?... :lol: don't brag about bein a dem..we're not proud of senator byrd either...a former klansmen...no doubt like yourself...

http://usera.imagecave.com/chefmike/bush.gifThe clan wouldn't let me in back in the early 60's. because i was Catholic. Rush is awesome....you should listen to him sometime. You might learn something. When you grow up Mike, you'll probably be a Proud Republican too.

[GroobySteven]

The Miers thing was a pretty good of political smokescreening, I called it exactly also.
Put forward a woman with no relevant experience, leak her agendas from the 90's and her staunch right wing anti-abortion issues and have her demonised in the press ("sucking satans cock you little bitch..." - Bill Hicks!) when you drop her nomination, the next guy who is a rightwing cocksucker also, doesn't look quite so bad next to Miers.
YourDaddy are you republican fiscally and US as the agressor, or also down with the other religiously motivated issues that seem to have been the only reason, Bush got in twice?
seanchai

[BlackAdder]

Proud republican.....Is there such a thing?? Oxymoron...emphasis moron.....

Im not down with the Libs wanting to take away my guns, but there not as evil as the cons thats for sure...

Libertarian party member since 1999. I wish our party could raise more money:(

[yourdaddy]

The Miers thing was a pretty good of political smokescreening, I called it exactly also.
Put forward a woman with no relevant experience, leak her agendas from the 90's and her staunch right wing anti-abortion issues and have her demonised in the press ("sucking satans cock you little bitch..." - Bill Hicks!) when you drop her nomination, the next guy who is a rightwing cocksucker also, doesn't look quite so bad next to Miers.
YourDaddy are you republican fiscally and US as the agressor, or also down with the other religiously motivated issues that seem to have been the only reason, Bush got in twice?
seanchaiNo seanchi, I'm just a good old American boy, who grew away from organized religion about 30 years ago. I'm still in the Union, still work hard for a living, voted for Jimmy Carter (whoops), voted for bill clinton (whoops), but finally realized that demsare actually not any different from the politburo. When no one else has any money, they will be in total power. That's all dems understand and practice and preach....total power over the masses.

[hondarobot]

Well, this thread is gonna be near the top for awhile. Good work chefmike, you know how to get posters posting (not a jab, I'm serious, debate is good).

And Seanchai, PLEASE post some spoilers on Lost. I willing to bet you've met some of the cast and crew, Hawaii isn't that big of a place. You gotta know something.

[chefmike]

Well, this thread is gonna be near the top for awhile. Good work chefmike, you know how to get posters posting (not a jab, I'm serious, debate is good).

And Seanchai, PLEASE post some spoilers on Lost. I willing to bet you've met some of the cast and crew, Hawaii isn't that big of a place. You gotta know something.

thanks, honda...glad to see you hanging out again

[chefmike]

Proud republican.....Is there such a thing?? Oxymoron...emphasis moron.....

Im not down with the Libs wanting to take away my guns, but there not as evil as the cons thats for sure...

Libertarian party member since 1999. I wish our party could raise more money:(

I've said before that I wish there were more third party choices, and a third party strong enough to attract someone who is electible..I'm disgusted by how beholden the dems are to corporate interests, nowadays...but for me...sometimes you have to hold your nose, and vote for the lesser of two evils...I will continue to vote against the religious right...I am very sympathetic with a great deal of the libertarian agenda, however...

[GroobySteven]

The Miers thing was a pretty good of political smokescreening, I called it exactly also.
Put forward a woman with no relevant experience, leak her agendas from the 90's and her staunch right wing anti-abortion issues and have her demonised in the press ("sucking satans cock you little bitch..." - Bill Hicks!) when you drop her nomination, the next guy who is a rightwing cocksucker also, doesn't look quite so bad next to Miers.
YourDaddy are you republican fiscally and US as the agressor, or also down with the other religiously motivated issues that seem to have been the only reason, Bush got in twice?
seanchaiNo seanchi, I'm just a good old American boy, who grew away from organized religion about 30 years ago. I'm still in the Union, still work hard for a living, voted for Jimmy Carter (whoops), voted for bill clinton (whoops), but finally realized that demsare actually not any different from the politburo. When no one else has any money, they will be in total power. That's all dems understand and practice and preach....total power over the masses.

Ok - given that in my opinion, both the dems and reps preach total power over the masses (please American get a viable 3rd party) - you support the Republicans based on how you think they're going to run the US. What are you're personal feelings on:
1/ The abortion issue?
2/ Gay marriage?
3/ Gun Control?
4/ Religion in schools?

It seems that many many Americans vote purely on one of the above agendas and not on the big picture. That is fine when in general it's going with your thoughts but what if it was going against you. Do you not feel that the Republican stance is weakened somewhat by having what many (including most of the rest of the world) see as "crazies"?
I don't think any government leader in a democracy should be putting their religion at the front of so many of their policies (that includes you Mr Blair).
seanchai

[chefmike]

The Miers thing was a pretty good of political smokescreening, I called it exactly also.
Put forward a woman with no relevant experience, leak her agendas from the 90's and her staunch right wing anti-abortion issues and have her demonised in the press ("sucking satans cock you little bitch..." - Bill Hicks!) when you drop her nomination, the next guy who is a rightwing cocksucker also, doesn't look quite so bad next to Miers.
YourDaddy are you republican fiscally and US as the agressor, or also down with the other religiously motivated issues that seem to have been the only reason, Bush got in twice?
seanchaiNo seanchi, I'm just a good old American boy, who grew away from organized religion about 30 years ago. I'm still in the Union, still work hard for a living, voted for Jimmy Carter (whoops), voted for bill clinton (whoops), but finally realized that demsare actually not any different from the politburo. When no one else has any money, they will be in total power. That's all dems understand and practice and preach....total power over the masses.

Ok - given that in my opinion, both the dems and reps preach total power over the masses (please American get a viable 3rd party) - you support the Republicans based on how you think they're going to run the US. What are you're personal feelings on:
1/ The abortion issue?
2/ Gay marriage?
3/ Gun Control?
4/ Religion in schools?

It seems that many many Americans vote purely on one of the above agendas and not on the big picture. That is fine when in general it's going with your thoughts but what if it was going against you. Do you not feel that the Republican stance is weakened somewhat by having what many (including most of the rest of the world) see as "crazies"?
I don't think any government leader in a democracy should be putting their religion at the front of so many of their policies (that includes you Mr Blair).
seanchai

and, more importantly...neither did America's founding fathers....

[AllanahStarrNYC]

ok

can someone explain to me why we need to own guns?

[TheAlphaMale]

ok

can someone explain to me why we need to own guns?

For protection my dear!!

[yourdaddy]

ok

can someone explain to me why we need to own guns?Yes, it's a worn out, trite saying, and I hate to quote it. " when owning guns is criminalized, only criminals will own guns" I have had my house broken into 4 times in 20 years. 3 of those times, they stole guns that I keep for self defense. How would you like to get shot with your own gun? Those hoodlums only understand firepower. That is their ticket to macho.

[Harrys Boy]

u need a gun to protect u from all ur admirers Allanah ;)

[joyboy123]

ok

can someone explain to me why we need to own guns?

Same reason people are into antique cars, harley motorcycles etc. It gives them something to talk about and they feel like they are part of something. Other than that, I really can't think of a good reason, unless your are into hunting.

No offense to the Harely guys, or antique car owners.

Yeah, I know, my post sounds pretty lame and stupid to me also.

[chefmike]

ok

can someone explain to me why we need to own guns?
the only gun I own is between my legs...but my only problem with gun ownership is automatic weapons...I don't hunt...but neither am I a vegan, so I can't speak out against fair hunting...not that shit they do on the game preserves, or whatever they call em

[hondarobot]

I don't agree with being opposed to guns in general. They are dangerous, but so are lots of things. I mean, lots of commonly available things are far more dangerous than a gun.

There should be gun control, many people should not own them. But a gun is just a machine, and machines have ways to be used for good or bad. Admittedly, guns have only one purpose, but self defense is not a bad option for some people (I know, that sounds like John Wayne looney bullshit, but really it is true sometimes).

I wouldn't want to live in a society that said no private citizen could own one.

It's a Big Question, just my take on it and I can see both sides of the argument.

[AllanahStarrNYC]

huh i see-

to protect you from who alpha?

yourdaddy said himself his house was broken into and his guns were stolen- then in the hands of more criminals.

well- i think guns, unless for law enforcement are pretty pointless. i am all for gun control

[hondarobot]

Come on now Allanah, what would all the hard drinking private eyes do without a gun in the pocket of their rumpled suits? I love hard drinking private eyes, the world would suck without that kinda flair. You gotta slap the bad guys with something from time to time.

hehe. But really, gun control good, no guns at all would be bad, just my opinion.

Oh, and I don't hunt, but I do eat meat. Hunting just seems kinda boring and weird.

:)

[chefmike]

some visual editorial comments...

the GOP viewpoint...then (Clinton) and now....

[chefmike]

and shrubya's brain, karl rove...

[chefmike]

and the evil empire...owned by the Saudi's...bought and paid for...

[chefmike]

yes!



scooter libby 5 counts

karl rove remains under suspicion

dick cheney scared shitless

shrubya....nice job "restoring honor and dignity to the oval office"

[chefmike]

"restoring honor and dignity to the oval office"

[Quinn]

I started looking into Patrick Fitzgerald's track record just to see what type of prosecutor he is. He is exceedingly thorough/meticulous and definitely not the type of guy that you want looking into your background. Still, I would be surprised if he gets any further than Libby. If there's one thing that has become painfully obvious over the last twenty five years, it's that the White House is a great shield to hide behind when seeking to avoid prosecution as a senior public official.

-Quinn

[chefmike]

I hope he gets further, but I'm not bettin on it...

[hondarobot]

I'm betting Karl Rove is found guilty of high treason and is publicly executed.

Or it gets no further then Libby. It could go either way on this one.

8)

[chefmike]

lol...we got 2 more yes votes to indictments after they were announced

and now a third vote for "vast left wing conspiracy..." LMFAOOOOO

and I'm pretty damned sure I can name all 3 of those votes...

but elections are confidential...

but it didn't stop shrubya from stealing the last two...

[chefmike]

a suggestion for karl rove's Christmas card...

[chefmike]

scapegoat?

[chefmike]

let's not forget this indictment...

[chefmike]

for those of you still voting...
scooter libby was "cheney the dick's" white house chief of staff...
so, yes...there have been white house indictments...


now the question is...will there be further indictments?...

because if you think libby acted alone, without rove and cheney's knowledge....

then I got some nice real estate in the swamp to sell you...

and while I would love to see shrubya waving his resignation goodbye...ala tricky dick nixon...may he rest in hell...

I think the best we can hope for is a rove indictment...or a public hanging, as honda predicted...which I would buy tickets to...and have a tailgate party...everyone's invited, especially you schmucks who voted for vast left wing conspiracy...suck it up!

[hondarobot]

Oh come on ChefMike, you know the public execution thing was just an absurd point. Nice take on it, though.

Karl Rove, and Cheney, and the whole current White House Gang have been playing dirty pool for years. They should be held accountable.

I was just being silly with the execution thing.

It also occurs to me that this post I'm making is retarded, I'm just drunk right now.

Good Night!

:D

[chefmike]

Cheers...I'm fixing some tex-mex...as a salute to shrubya...and I wasn't kidding about my tailgate party, there's some collateral damage I can support...I wonder what all the retarded people he executed in Texas had for their last meal...probably the same thing... as the sheep who voted for vast left wing conspiracy....enjoy!!

[twowaybro]

well now....let's c....in all likelihood Libby will take the fall 2 protect Cheney....and Rove will probably cut some kind of deal 2 avoid jail time but imo these charges and this scandal is but a clever smokescreen that will divert one's attention from the total dismantling of all of our civil liberties in the guise of "Homeland Security". The following link is a good example....

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/102705_world_stories.shtml

Now that is some scary shit.... 8) 8)

[chefmike]

yeah, I hear ya...the only thing that could make Homeland Security sound more nazi-esque, is if we called it Fatherland Security...Bushland Uber Alles

[Roadblock7611]

who? muhahahahahah

[chefmike]

VP Cheney aka DICK will be called upon to testify...will he claim executive privilege?

Special Prosecutor refuses to accept Scooter "the lackey" Libby's attempt at a plea bargain...wants him to do time...

[Eric420]

Vast left wing conspiracy?

LOL...

break out the tinfoil hats fellas...

Uneducated people are almost as retarded as pseudo-educated people...

sheeeeeeeeeeet... Rumsfeld should have been bounced out a long time ago as well... or at least had a chemstick jammed up his rectum to see what its like to be on the other end of his orders... from Bush on down they are crooks and criminals.

[Hugh Jarrod]

There will be few indictments if any.

[chefmike]

Robert Novak (the right-wing columnist who started the CIA leak investigation), said today "I'm confident the president knows who the source is, I'd be amazed if he doesn't"

www.newsobserver.com/114/story/377675.html

Cheney lackey "scooter" Libbey already indicted, Rove still under investigation, will this lead to the oval office?

And isn't treason (outing a CIA agent) in a time of war punishable by death?

[chefmike]

:arrow:

[chefmike]

Will there be MORE Whitehouse Indictments?

Scooter Libby is rolling over on Cheney...and lets not forget that Agnew resigned before "tricky dick" Nixon - whose legacy shrubya not only appears to be destined to follow, but follow on a far "grander" scale...

shrubya is one lucky schmuck...considering that the GOP holds the majority on the hill,
for now anyway...lets see what happens after mid-term elections...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/10/schneider.tenors/

http://www.newkerala.com/news2.php?action=fullnews&id=7657

http://www.newshounds.us/2006/02/10/is_libby_shopping_for_a_pardon.php

[BOATER]

IMO, Bush is safe from impeachment. He is in the dark about much of what is going on. Cheney has his own agenda and fills in Pres when he needs to.
If anything goes down, it will be Cheney who will take the heat. And Bush will give him a pardon.
And in the end the Big Dick (Cheney) will get away with all the shit he helped, and continue making million on Weapon contracts.