How do Tgirls on estrogn get hard?

[Casanovaman]

How do Tgirls on estrogn get hard? Especially the castrated ones with no testosterone? Viagra?

[youcancallmeclaire]

How do Tgirls on estrogn get hard? Especially the castrated ones with no testosterone? Viagra?

It just kind of goes if you ask it real nice. (or if you show it some really hot porn)

[BrendaQG]

By being attracted to the person we are going to have sex with.

[BeardedOne]

Vewwy, vewwy carefuwwy.

[justatransgirl]

I've been on Estrogen for nearly 3 years and I still get hard IF my partner turns me on sexually and rubs me just right.

If not it will lay there all night.

It doesn't get as rock hard as when I was 19, and because I'm quite thick it's hard for me to do anal as a "top" (which is fine - I'm a girl) but vaginal sex with a gg is no problem.

My partner Jessica, who's 23, gets plenty hard - which is good since she's my top!

Giggle,
TS Jamie :-)

[wombat33]

How do Tgirls on estrogn get hard? Especially the castrated ones with no testosterone? Viagra?


viagra

[Lady Angela]

Yes viagra.
And of course us transexual ladies are feminine women. I'm a lady, in the submissive feminine role in my relationship, and many men, like my handsome masculine man, like a beautiful, feminine transexual lady with a cute limp ladystick.

[justatransgirl]

Oh yeah, I forgot. Viagra.

And I agree with Lady Angela. If you want a big hard cock full of sperm - date a man - I'm a girl with a dick - that doesn't mean I want to stick it into things.

Giggle,
TS Jamie :-)

[Hara_Juku Tgirl]

Mind over matter! LOL ;)

~Kisses.

HTG

[JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel]

http://onlineviagrabuy.com/wp-content/viagra.jpg

[qeuqheeg222]

it depends on the tg feelings at the moment-like some have said,if they are really into you they get hard and can still cum with some difficulty and diligence...maybe teabaggin them will help...

[Lady Angela]

As I mentioned, my man likes my feminized ladystick.
One thing I sometimes do to enhance the femininity of my ladystick, is to tie a little sensual chiffon scarf around the base of my ladystick. My man loves the look and feel of my ladystick and testicles in sensual chiffon.

[slinky]

Castrated TS's were getting hardons long before Viagra was invented.

[youcancallmeclaire]

I always wondered this... does viagra mess with your hormone levels?
I think it would be great for solo shoots, but I have no problem functioning when someone else is involved. :)

[SarahG]

I always wondered this... does viagra mess with your hormone levels?
I think it would be great for solo shoots, but I have no problem functioning when someone else is involved. :)

Viagra works by messing with the blood system, remember the penis is just a hydrologic system and not so much of a muscle.

It also causes migraines for some people, esp GGs- so if you have migraine problems naturally you may wanna be careful with viagra

[BrendaQG]

The men who make me hardest are the men who want it in them te least. You could try to act like you are uninterested in being topped.

What androgen blockers and estrogen can do is lower your sperm count to near zero...

[dan_drade]

I could be wrong and I am not a hormone expert. But I would think that an erection has more to do with sexual desire rather than homones. So if you have the sexual desire to have sex with someone, the erection will be there.

[slinky]

What are the Side Effects
Even when a drug is taken as prescribed, side effects can occur. Viagra is no exception. Here are some common and not so common side effects you should be aware of before taking the drug.

Common

* flushing
* headache
* nasal congestion
* stomach discomfort following meals

Less Common

* abnormal vision including blurred vision, seeing shades of colors differently than before, or sensitivity to light
* bladder pain
* cloudy or bloody urine
* dizziness
* increased frequency of urination
* pain on urination
* diarrhea

Rare

* bleeding of the eye
* convulsions (seizures)
* decreased or double vision or in extreme cases blindness
* a blue tint to your vision
* prolonged, painful, or inappropriate erection of penis
* redness, burning, or swelling of the eye
* anxiety

[slinky]

PS I think they are wrong about how rare the blue vision is.

[Wicked Mira]

The truth is that without testosterone, there is no libido. As long as a pre-op has testicles, no matter how small, there are trace amounts entering the body. Once they're gone so is the only real source and usually that means good bye to your libido.

As a post-op I can tell you that it isn't easy to figure out how to get that fixed. I finally found a sympathetic gyn who listened and proscribed a testosterone supplement. That's all it took but why many post-ops seek to settle down and lose interest. For me, well I can't seem to get enough! Never liked cock before but now I seem to be addicted!

Hope that helps.

[blackrob]

The men who make me hardest are the men who want it in them te least. You could try to act like you are uninterested in being topped.

What androgen blockers and estrogen can do is lower your sperm count to near zero...

you'd like me then.

[NYTSJulie]

I dated a urologist for a while. The 3 erection medications are Cialis, Levitra and Viagra. Most people find Viagra to be the least effective of the 3.

[Jericho]

How do Tgirls on estrogn get hard?

They learn karate. 8)

[KiraHarden]

I am castrated ( Orchiectomy), (2 yrs ago) and I still have the ability to get erections without viagra, but only if im attracted to the man and he is masculine top. The passive fem or bottom guys do nothing for me sexually, and I never get erect. Its all about being sexually attracted to someone, not testosterone.

[TsJennifer]

Warning, me being nasty!

Well Im taking a low dose of hormones right now and I have no problem getting hard. In fact I wake up with a huge hard on every morning. I swear I just jerked off as I have been doing every night b4 bed and I shot clear past my head and got cum in my hair....lol

I guess u just need to take the right amount of hormones for you!

Btw: Cialis works the best and last for 2 to 3 days.

Jennifer Paris

http://www.JenniferParis.net

Imagine waking up to this !

[wombat33]

Warning, me being nasty!

Well Im taking a low dose of hormones right now and I have no problem getting hard. In fact I wake up with a huge hard on every morning. I swear I just jerked off as I have been doing every night b4 bed and I shot clear past my head and got cum in my hair....lol

I guess u just need to take the right amount of hormones for you!

Btw: Cialis works the best and last for 2 to 3 days.

Jennifer Paris

http://www.JenniferParis.net

Imagine waking up to this !



I am in love..............yet again. Gorgeous photo and with what you said about waking up with a hard on.............OMG

[wombat33]

Warning, me being nasty!

Well Im taking a low dose of hormones right now and I have no problem getting hard. In fact I wake up with a huge hard on every morning. I swear I just jerked off as I have been doing every night b4 bed and I shot clear past my head and got cum in my hair....lol

I guess u just need to take the right amount of hormones for you!

Btw: Cialis works the best and last for 2 to 3 days.

Jennifer Paris

http://www.JenniferParis.net


Worth saying again............I AM IN LOVE.

Miss Jennifer this is one of the prettiest and alluring photos I have ever seen TG or GG. You are stunning and this photo made my day.
Imagine waking up to this !

[whatsupwithat]

great thread.

i think it depends on the person and their physical makeup. been in a relationship where she got an erection no problem and came everytime. i've aso been in a relationship where the erection was there but having an orgasm was tres difficult for her.

personally, i prefer the former because sex to me is not just about my pleasure. i find it to be the most fulfilling and erotic when myself and my partner can orgasm together.

but, again, we are all different and there are other ways to express love for our partners without an orgasm.

[hustle13]

Hey cool! I just joined, and I came here looking for just this type of information. I was with my first T-girl last week, a hot top escort. I did not know what to expect regarding her and erections, but was surprised-she stayed very hard for the entire hour, and shot a lot (and I mean a lot!) of come. Considering it was late afternoon, and she was on tour, I assumed I was not her first guy that day. That made the amount of come even more surprising. This is not common is it?

[Lady Angela]

Of the t-women I know, after being on estrogen for awhile, they need viagra or some other such drug, if they want to be as virile as they once were.

Kira,
That is lovely that you are castarated.
Like yourself, I am considering being castarated, but also keeping my "ladystick".
I know castrated women can quit taking anti-andrgoens, and take less estrogen, which is better for a t-lady's health.

Kira,
Do you feel more feminine now that you are castarated?
The t-women I know, whether they are completely post-op and have been given a vagina, or whether they just have their testicles removed and keep their ladystick, have told me they feel more feminine and ladylike.
Because I have been completely feminized (estrogen, breast implants, facial feminization surgery, etc.), except for my male genetalia, I already feel very feminine and ladylike, and consider myself a woman, my man considers himself hetrosexual and considers me a lady, as does everyone else, I live, look, and act as a woman.
But I suppose a castarated t-woman feels even more feminine and like a lady.

[KiraHarden]

Of the t-women I know, after being on estrogen for awhile, they need viagra or some other such drug, if they want to be as virile as they once were.

Kira,
That is lovely that you are castarated.
Like yourself, I am considering being castarated, but also keeping my "ladystick".
I know castrated women can quit taking anti-andrgoens, and take less estrogen, which is better for a t-lady's health.

Kira,
Do you feel more feminine now that you are castarated?
The t-women I know, whether they are completely post-op and have been given a vagina, or whether they just have their testicles removed and keep their ladystick, have told me they feel more feminine and ladylike.
Because I have been completely feminized (estrogen, breast implants, facial feminization surgery, etc.), except for my male genetalia, I already feel very feminine and ladylike, and consider myself a woman, my man considers himself hetrosexual and considers me a lady, as does everyone else, I live, look, and act as a woman.
But I suppose a castarated t-woman feels even more feminine and like a lady.
With all due respect you talk like a Crossdressing male, and not a Transsexual female

[Lady Angela]

With all due respect?
And how exactly do crossdressing males, or a t-ladies express themselves? Are they all the same? That is a generalization. And a silly statement.
But I was a crossdressing male for many years, until I transitioned to a t-lady over the past two years. Weren't all t-ladies that initially?

[SarahG]

Clinically speaking transsexuals spend their lives with the medical condition of gender identity dysphora... in that sense, no matter what, no transsexual was ever a transvestite.

Does that mean we are to use the term crossdressing separately from the psychological condition of TV to describe "the act of being part time"? Possibly and in that sense, transsexuals prior to going FT would be CDs... during that initial phase but that would not make them TVs.

Expanding from that, I would suggest that by and large tvs and people who have GID are going to talk differently from each other to some extent, for the same reasons why nontrans girls and nontrans guys talk differently from each other to some extent.

[PatrickFromNYC]

Warning, me being nasty!

Well Im taking a low dose of hormones right now and I have no problem getting hard. In fact I wake up with a huge hard on every morning. I swear I just jerked off as I have been doing every night b4 bed and I shot clear past my head and got cum in my hair....lol

I guess u just need to take the right amount of hormones for you!

Btw: Cialis works the best and last for 2 to 3 days.

Jennifer Paris

http://www.JenniferParis.net

:shock:

Imagine waking up to this !

[NYTSJulie]

I been on hormones for 11 years, I am still horny as fuck and always crank one out every night be4 bed..........Kiss Kiss

[mbf]

I been on hormones for 11 years, I am still horny as fuck and always crank one out every night be4 bed..........Kiss Kiss

what about morning wood? I am just curious

:?:

[NYTSJulie]

I been on hormones for 11 years, I am still horny as fuck and always crank one out every night be4 bed..........Kiss Kiss

what about morning wood? I am just curious

:?:

Sometimes I get morning wood but not always. I honestly HATE sex in the morning, its the last thing from my mind. I remember my ex learned the hard way, lol. When we first started dating I woke up to him licking my ass one morning. He ended up getting a knee to his forehead, lol.

I sleep in the nude and have since I was young. When I wake up I think of a strong cup of coffee with a cig. I put on my robe and head to the kitchen.

[hwbs]

all the girls that i dated were always on mones and had no problem ..this is another topic where the inexperienced are left out in the cold with their guessing games on what might be or not...

[ballbreaker]

love to wake up to you julie

[BrendaQG]

@ Lady Angela.

Yeah you really do sound like a CD'er. Transsexuals, real transsexuals feel fem no matter what their circulating hormones say. I mean...if you think that your brain was "hard wired" for transsexualism...then why would hormones change anything? Or do you just think like so many other fetishistic transsexuals and non-transsexuals that hormones can make you act like a man/woman?

@ Sara_G

All anyone can do is call it as they see it. The future is totally unknown.

[Wicked Mira]

http://pflag-es.org/marchapril06.html[/url]

I couldn't agree more! What is the fixation people have with labels? What is the source of the need to cateogorize, label and put people in neat little boxes? I think it's fear. What one person does and how they express themselves doesn't mean anything about how someone else expresses themselves. Male, female, TS, TG, CD. Label me what you want, it doesn't matter to me nor completely define me. I'm just me and I express myself in accordance with how I wish to define myself.

As for this entire hormone discussion, I'm concerned about misinformation being dispensed as though what is true for one person is true for all. And, by the way, I think scientifically there is a basis for asserting that hormones do cause physiological changes in the neural pathways of the brain. After ten years of being post-op and being someone highly attuned to their own thoughts, emotions and behaviors I do believe that time (and it takes a long time for the physiological changes to occur) does cause fundamental changes not just in anatomy but neurologically. Medically, the female brain and male brain are structurally different and how brains process information is different, generally speaking. If you lived any period of time on largely testosterone or largely on estrogen (post-puberty) your brain developed accordingly. And thoughts and emotions stem from the cerebral cortex, not from the genitals.

Ask any endocrinologist and I believe they will tell you that there is no exact science behind hormone therapy as everybody's body is different and people tend to react differently to different levels and doses.

But, why can't we just allow people to be themselves and give each other a lot more slack?

[SarahG]

[quote="tabathasiren
What is the fixation people have with labels? What is the source of the need to cateogorize, label and put people in neat little boxes? I think it's fear.

I don't think it is fear per say, I think that it is but human nature to try to make observations, to compare, classify, to understand... in a sense these observations and classifications are legitimate. There are real and tangible differences between feminine and masculine genders, hence the whole transistion thing.

Would transitioning exist in a world in which these differences were all moot? I don't particularly think it would... at least not in the sense that we know it as.

People can claim to be whatever they want, that doesn't always make it so. People can use terminology however they want, that doesn't make that terminology usage accurate.



But, why can't we just allow people to be themselves and give each other a lot more slack?


That one is simple. I am not accusing anyone here of playing apart in this, BUT- people's actions, protrayls, illusions have drastic ramifications on how we are seen by the general population. I am not saying that people shouldn't be allowed to be themselves, just pointing out that those actions have consequences in how we are seen in the eyes of others. There are certainly more than enough misconceptions, stereotypes and transphobic images to go around without people proliferating them on the inside of the community.

[Wicked Mira]

Your points are well made, Sarah, and I can't disagree. I do think, however, that at the bottom of the need to classify, categorize and label is a fear of the unknown, which is also human nature. Gender, more than anything in our culture, touches upon that fear. We need predictability, consistency as a species to feel safe. We need men to be men and women to be women. Also at the crux of it is a societal need for conformity. We are made to conform to societal norms on every level since we are born.

However, gender is one of the last frontiers. And there are different aspects of gender--first is the purely biological aspect for reproduction. But even in the animal kingdom (of which we are part, by the way) some species have the ability to change sexes to meet that biological imperative (certain fish, amphibians). Then there is the gender "roles" which is what we're speaking of in this thread.

Because of our need for predictability and consistency, we force genders to adopt specific roles and that has been eroding since the 1960s, maybe earlier. (Rosie the Riveter). My personal opinion is that each of us as human beings contain the essence of male and female and it is the suppression of one in favor of the other that creates problems. Kate Bornstein wrote that we shouldn't think of ourselves as male or female but a third gender. TG's have the courage (or need) to oppose the suppression of who we are. I defy anyone to state a personality characteristic of male or female which is exclusive to that gender.

As for conduct which casts us in a bad light. That is society's problem in preception. I strongly and adamantly believe that sex workers provide an incredibly valuable service to society. Personally, I believe a lot more marriages would fall apart if men didn't have an outlet for what they need. Based largely in our Christian heritage, we have labeled anything to do with our sexuality as based in our "animal" origins and therefore wrong, dirty and sinful. Those who provide the service are, therefore, classified as dirty, immoral and sinful. I would give a thousand Christian evangelical hypocrites for one cock-sucking street tranny who has a good heart.

[SarahG]

As for conduct which casts us in a bad light. That is society's problem in preception. I strongly and adamantly believe that sex workers provide an incredibly valuable service to society. Personally, I believe a lot more marriages would fall apart if men didn't have an outlet for what they need. Based largely in our Christian heritage, we have labeled anything to do with our sexuality as based in our "animal" origins and therefore wrong, dirty and sinful. Those who provide the service are, therefore, classified as dirty, immoral and sinful. I would give a thousand Christian evangelical hypocrites for one cock-sucking street tranny who has a good heart.

I wasn't talking about sex work by any means.

I wouldn't throw all the blame at societal perceptions, that is very much a cop out to explain away the transphobic sentiments out there. There are things in our community that have real ramifications, things of which it is really no surprise that there are bad results. All the infighting, violence, not to mention the widespread stereotypes of stuff like some of the late transistioners running around with only srs completed, using their postop status to "flash" convince people in public that they're "really girls after all"

It's one thing when a society just "gets it entirely wrong" in their perspectives and false assumptions, its another altogether where in addition to such, the process is fed by actions that can have no productive purpose.

The last thing we need is more confusion among the general public pertaining to the differences between those who are ts and those are tv... the reason why medical care for our legitimate medical condition has had such opposition in this country and others like it is directly related to the (false) notion by medical professionals and the general public alike that transsexuality is a sexual fetish or has fetishist components. This generates a lasting legacy of problems for us. Beyond the fiscal drain of out of pocket transitioning expenses, class divisions of appearance based on fiscal access to surgical procedures... it is precisely Bailey & Blanchardist like fetishist philosophies that are used to both prevent governmental protections from extending to our populations and to keep medical treatments as abrasive and far from reach as possible.

Fear is only one aspect of discovery, curiosity is probably a bit greater of a force. People seen to have an appetite for discover, knowledge, expierence... there are simply too many dry, boring, fearless technical or scientific fields out there to merely say we fear what isn't known, so we must try to know everything IMO.

[SarahG]

it is precisely Bailey & Blanchardist like fetishist philosophies that are used to both prevent governmental protections from extending to our populations and to keep medical treatments as abrasive and far from reach as possible.

Not to sound ridiculously new to all this, but I don't suppose you'd know any good places to start reading about this whole Bailey/Blanchard controversy, would you? I picked up a copy of The Man Who Would Be Queen after seeing the recent write-up of Bailey in the Times, and my curiosity about the whole autogynephilia debate has been piqued.

What kind of information are you looking for?

All it really boils down to are a select few nontrans "professionals" who are running around making baseless, evidenceless causation theories after realizing the more controversial, radical, and insane their claims become, the more likely they are to keep their institutional jobs, get raises as publicity arrives, and find any number of special interest proprietors.

Since its all about GID causation theory, only those in the religious right, people who are trans, and the hacks spewing this crap give a damn about the theories and/or their lack of scientific method... and in the end it distracts the community into battling over something that doesn't impact our existance in any tangible way, giving power & control over to opponents from the right whom can take hold of the issue and use it to define GID related dialogs.... there is a reason why in a formal debate, the person who defines the conversation always wins. Politics is no different, Bailey (or Blanchard) debates shift us into the position of reactive rather than proactive policy, waring over scientific fiction while real issues slip to the background.

The book should be evidence enough alone to Bailey's lack of scientific principle.

[SarahG]

it is precisely Bailey & Blanchardist like fetishist philosophies that are used to both prevent governmental protections from extending to our populations and to keep medical treatments as abrasive and far from reach as possible.

Not to sound ridiculously new to all this, but I don't suppose you'd know any good places to start reading about this whole Bailey/Blanchard controversy, would you? I picked up a copy of The Man Who Would Be Queen after seeing the recent write-up of Bailey in the Times, and my curiosity about the whole autogynephilia debate has been piqued.

What kind of information are you looking for?

All it really boils down to are a select few nontrans "professionals" who are running around making baseless, evidenceless causation theories after realizing the more controversial, radical, and insane their claims become, the more likely they are to keep their institutional jobs, get raises as publicity arrives, and find any number of special interest proprietors.

Since its all about GID causation theory, only those in the religious right, people who are trans, and the hacks spewing this crap give a damn about the theories and/or their lack of scientific method... and in the end it distracts the community into battling over something that doesn't impact our existance in any tangible way, giving power & control over to opponents from the right whom can take hold of the issue and use it to define GID related dialogs.... there is a reason why in a formal debate, the person who defines the conversation always wins. Politics is no different, Bailey (or Blanchard) debates shift us into the position of reactive rather than proactive policy, waring over scientific fiction while real issues slip to the background.

The book should be evidence enough alone to Bailey's lack of scientific principle.

Well, while I would definitely agree that it would be an understatement to say that Bailey is way too casual about taking things that "everybody knows" for granted, I did leave the book with the impression that he at least cares about issues of gender identity. I guess the sort of information I am looking for is, first, scientific evidence that contradicts his claims, and, second, information about him that might explain why he gets such a bad rap. I understand that the things he is saying are far from popular in the TG community, but a big part of me wonders how much of his work is discredited and how much of it is just against the party line.

I absolutely do not mean to suggest that anyone who disagrees with Bailey must be emphasizing the politics aspect of things; I just feel like I came into the whole discussion late and wondered if there was a good starting point on the factual issues at hand.

Why look for evidence to run counter his claims when he has no evidence to backup his own?

It just sounds like a dog chasing its tail after a while imo.

The issue is, at least as I see it, that he has no scientific backing in his assertions. You can't just run around without evidence saying that all GID patients are either just really fem gay guys, or guys that get turned on by feminization. What's to discredit when he has no real studies, no expirements, nothing of any value outside of a few twisted, spin'd interviews he made with a few (not many) girls out in public.

If virtually ANYONE involved with a scientific or technological field outside of lgbt "science" made a publication in recent memory without evidence, with over reaching assertions on such a scale... they'd be laughed out of their field. Why does Bailey get a free pass because the subjects are a trivialized, ignored minority?

Ok, I take that back, there are a few people presenting as scientists talking about intelligent design as if it were a scientific field worthy of our classrooms, museums and other institutions... but at least part of the population tends to view them as hacks in the same sense as holocaust deniers are.

[peggygee]

it is precisely Bailey & Blanchardist like fetishist philosophies that are used to both prevent governmental protections from extending to our populations and to keep medical treatments as abrasive and far from reach as possible.

Not to sound ridiculously new to all this, but I don't suppose you'd know any good places to start reading about this whole Bailey/Blanchard controversy, would you? I picked up a copy of The Man Who Would Be Queen after seeing the recent write-up of Bailey in the Times, and my curiosity about the whole autogynephilia debate has been piqued.

At this site you will find Lynn Conway, et al provide intensive, and exhaustive
insight and discussion on Blanchard and Bailey, replete with cites and
supporting material. (http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/LynnsReviewOfBaileysBook.html#How)

[Lady Angela]

Not all male to female transexuals believed they were females all of their life.
Many have been hetrosexual men married to beautiful genetic women. I have a beautiful genetic lady as my ex-wife, and have fathered four beautiful daughters.
My ex-wife and daughters have accepted my transition. My ex-wife now considers me one of her best women friends, and my daughters now refer to me as their other mom, not their dad. I get along well with my ex-wfe and my daughters.
Gradually I became more gay, more femme, started dressing more as a lady, using feminine mannerisms, etc.. and then gradually became more like a woman and wanted to become one, and live and dress as a lady, and be a beautiful, feminine lady and be with a hetrosexual man.
Some male to female transexual women are lifelong femmes, who always wanted to be women, but some are not.

To me, when a person transitions from being a man to being a woman, by doing certain things; not only dressing in women's clothes, and wearing makeup, earrings and jewelry, etc., but using feminine mannerisms, going on female hormones, facial feminization surgery, eletrolysis, wearing feminine hairstyles (short hair or long hair), possibly women's breast implants, etc., and is living, looking, dressing, acting and passing as a lady, etc. and who considers herself a lady,............. then that person is no longer a male, or a "third sex", but a female, a different type of lady from a genetic lady, but still a lady, a transsexual lady.
That is why transexual women are refered to as "her" or "she".
Because I have dome those things, I am no longer a male crossdresser, but a transsexual woman, (regardless of what one or two of you may believe).
And because I am with a handsome masculine hetrosexual man, who considers me his lady, I am no longer a femme gay man, but a beautiful and feminine herosexual lady.

The longer a t-lady is on estrogen and anti-androgens, usually the less virile she is.
It is scientific. Anyone who has gone through it, or who is knowledgable about it, knows that.
It happens to some extent with every t-lady on estrogen and anti-androgens. Although I am sure it varies to what extent, as some of you women have mentioned. But it does happen to every t-lady to some degree. It is scientific. Estrogen and anti-androgens have an effect.
The same with castaration, no way is a t-lady as virile. The testicles produce male hormones. To believe it has no effect on virilty, is false.
Of course many t-women eventually complete their male to female transition, become post-op, and have their male genetalia removed and replaced with female genetalia.
I haven't decided yet when, or if, I am going to have that done.
It is nice having a ladystick, but having female genetalia would be wonderful also.

[Idgaf]

I find my preference for Ladies such as Lady Angela is for them to retain their "ladystick" ,it is both sensual and erotic.
But that is My preference ,I enjoy Ladies with a large "clit". If they enjoy oral that is ,that is of course a personal preference and some ladies do not think that "real" men should perform oral sex ,I think those people should join the 21st Century.

As far as getting and maintaining an erection it is a matter of exercise really.The penis is basically a hydraulic piston as long as more blood flows into the veins supporting the penis than flows out ,a firm erection will occur. That is whay masturbation is self defeating the localized pressure from the hand upon the veins in the penis will cause small holes to appear thus allowing blood a secondary exit from the penis.

Exercising the muscles is very easy and can be done at any time of the day.
First,when urinating try to stop the flow ,then release and try to stop it again.
When you have isolated that muscle group ,do not confuse it with muscles surrounding your anus.
You can begin to do sets of squeeze hold release ,squeeze hold release.
This will tighten the muscle group resonsible for allowing blood to flow out of the penis it will not inhibit flow into the penis.
Practice like doing crunches for your abs except these can be done ,on the bus ,at work ,during lunch ,wherever you desire.

I like sub femme ladies ,if they do or do not get hard or how hard they get is not the issue in my eyes.
I need to be hard to satisfy her and me.

[Lady Angela]

Idgaf,
You are like my man, he also wants me to keep my ladystick. He loves a beautiful, feminine lady with her ladystick.
I might be castrated though, and have my testicles removed but keep my ladystick. My man believes that would be sexy on me, and I wouldn't have to take as much estrogen, or anti-androgens. It is more healthy for a t-lady to be castrated in that regard, whether she is completely post-op, or keeps her ladystick.

[qeuqheeg222]

if someone tg is castrated like this can they cum?i've never met anyone like this.but i know someone in another city who went thru it...

[ludmilalover]

In fact I wake up with a huge hard on every morning. I swear I just jerked off as I have been doing every night b4 bed and I shot clear past my head and got cum in my hair....lol


:shock: :whoa :crazy