PDA

View Full Version : I'll ask the experts...What sites have this quality



Tianna
03-17-2005, 10:46 PM
Off and on other the course of several months I've been a member of about 4 to 5 sites. Among them 2 grooby sites 2 other and 1 european site. And it seems like they are all either going downhill or not pushing forward to a better customer experience.

Tonyasworld as of late has went to a place I dare not mention ;) it use to be very high quality, they still have tremendous models, though the photography ruins any chance of an enjoyable experience. I mean, 60 pictures with 4 actually showing a girls assets. They act like they're teasing us for some reason. We're paying adults, and to tease use with a lot of glamour shots is just terrible customer service.

Groobys sites still have exceptional models though it looks as if he's resting on his laurels especially since the competition has upped the ante with high res photos and video (wiredshemales, transpantyhose), although to be fair they too fall victim to the hide the penis rule (120 pics 6-10 hard penis shots).

To put it simply, the low resolution videos and pictures with bad photograpy and terrible model positions are simplly driving me up a wall.

At least now I've found exclusivetgirl. Does anyone know of a site that has comparable photographic quality to them. Like most of you, I use a high resolution monitor so the low resolution pictures and video of most of the other sites strain my eyes. Please don't reccomend Bobs he's the worst of the teasing offenders ;)

Thanks, Ciao

steeveX
03-17-2005, 10:52 PM
tianna rhymes with spammer ! (rather spamma)

partlycloudy
03-17-2005, 11:21 PM
brazilianshemalesclub

http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=1236&highlight=

Tianna
03-17-2005, 11:51 PM
tianna rhymes with spammer ! (rather spamma)

Are you just plain stupid? What is spamming about a serious question. You're soooo sad. Instead of an informed anwser to a first time poster. You insult me. You lower your worth.

You are soooo sad.

Vicki Richter
03-18-2005, 12:54 AM
Who wants to see 100 photos of the same penis naked in the same photo set? Part of the secret to adult photography is having some suspense... building to a climax. There is a reason that porn starts out with the girls dressed and they end up naked after some time period. Being bisexual I can talk about this with some degree of expertise. Look at Playboy magazine... They "hide the vagina" but it's still hot and people still wank off to it. If I goto a strip club, I would totally rather have the girls wearing thongs than full nudity. It adds another element.

So you have as good niche for your web site no doubt; geting rid of fluff and have all hard shecock in every photo. It pays to be different and some guys are totally going to appreciate that.

Vicki

ps - I was wondering if anyone here has heard of a site. It's called http://www.vickirichter.com. I also heard that unlike Grooby sites, it has literally thousands of exclusive pictures of that TS porn star Vicki Richter... You know the porn star of the year, etc etc... I think there are a lot of streaming videos, models, and other good stuff too. However, not being affilliated with the site in any way, I wouldn't know. :P

pss - I have been seeing a lot of this method of advertising lately being used by others in the industry so I am going to give it a shot.

LBCDO
03-18-2005, 01:24 AM
Yea, it just sounds like ashameless plug. When it comes into marketting of a website, high quality pics are considered, but not pics that are so hi-res that they feel 3d. I do graphic design all day and everyday, and I dont think any of the sites have photos taken in a resolution where the average consumer would have a problem.

dan_yearsgone83
03-18-2005, 01:50 AM
Coming from a college guy who has probably done about 10 1-month memberships to various sites over the last 2-3 years, there's a reason why I just signed up for Vicki's again when I got some extra breathing room in my checking account.

Ya hearrrrd me.

Tianna
03-18-2005, 03:31 AM
Yea, it just sounds like ashameless plug. When it comes into marketting of a website, high quality pics are considered, but not pics that are so hi-res that they feel 3d. I do graphic design all day and everyday, and I dont think any of the sites have photos taken in a resolution where the average consumer would have a problem.

I't seems some of those (most that have posted) on this board are "jaded", "aggressive", ill mannered. This is truly sad.

All I asked was a simple question looking for sites to my liking and I get philosophical rants about the lack of a penis in a photo from a "true" spammer model of the year or not. Sad, this aggressiveness seems to be a trend. I won't be coming back to this board, so many here are unhappy with their lives. Instead of speading joy, you spread ill will.

Soooo sad.

Ciao

GroobySteven
03-18-2005, 03:43 AM
Groobys sites still have exceptional models though it looks as if he's resting on his laurels especially since the competition has upped the ante with high res photos and video (wiredshemales, transpantyhose), although to be fair they too fall victim to the hide the penis rule (120 pics 6-10 hard penis shots).



This is so obviously spam for a site your working with - I use this board to my advertising advantage but rarely need to slander other websites to do it.
I fail to see how I rest on my laurels? We're showing at least 8-9 sets a week with video clips on Shemale Yum (compared with about 6 a week a year ago - many without clips), have upped the content and the quality massively on all sites with all photographers using higher end camera than a year ago (mainly 8Mp) - no other transsexual site has more video content than Brazilian-Transsexuals.com (or more hardcore content for that matter) and Ladyboy-Ladyboy.com is still the largest Asian Shemale site with more than 28 new models a month + video clips. Black Tgirls image quality has increased massively and is well received judging by how many questions are asked and how often the photos get posted on this board.
So basically....suck my ass!
seanchai

Ecstatic
03-18-2005, 03:44 AM
Not our loss, guy. May you find what you are looking for.

GroobySteven
03-18-2005, 04:08 AM
I also heard that unlike Grooby sites, it has literally thousands of exclusive pictures of that TS porn star Vicki Richter... You know the porn star of the year, etc etc... I think there are a lot of streaming videos, models, and other good stuff too. However, not being affilliated with the site in any way, I wouldn't know. :P

pss - I have been seeing a lot of this method of advertising lately being used by others in the industry so I am going to give it a shot.

Shemale Yum has 243 images of Vicki + videoclips.
(and over 940 other models)
Franks Tgirlworld has 408 images of Vicki + videoclips.
(and over 480 other models)

Only a diehar fan would want more and realise the value for money to be found on a GROOBY site!!!
seanchai

GroobySteven
03-18-2005, 04:12 AM
more

ndial
03-18-2005, 07:10 AM
seanchai, he may be plugging for another site but I think all he is saying is the same thing I've asked for on a couple of occasions in the past...just bump up the resolution. 8MP cameras are wasted when everything gets resized down to 563x750 anyway. There is no such thing as too big a picture. For those of us running 1600x1200 and above an increase would be excellent, and for those running much lower resolutions, pretty much every browser I can think of has an auto-resize option.

GroobySteven
03-18-2005, 07:19 AM
Ndial, I see your point but the increase would also increase the image size resulting in more download and slower download for many. Also the browser resize thing, is pretty poor - if my browser auto-resizes any images they look grainy and pixelated.
We're aiming at the majority of people and our images are 900-1000 pixels if landscape (on longest side) and 750-850 on height, so they're not small images. The image he showed didn't appear to be much or any better quality than the images we now show?
seanchai

ndial
03-18-2005, 07:42 AM
Have you ever considered the market feasibility of a Grooby "Premium HQ" type of site? I'm talking photos of 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 in size, most likely only the "top" models and very hottest newcomers. I have some pics of Duda Little like this and they are simply stunning. Of course I realize the membership fee would likely be hefty compared to the other sites, but I know I'd join and there is no way I'm the only one who feels this way.

ndial
03-18-2005, 07:47 AM
I can certainly imagine this would be difficult to get off the ground for most...a new site with an abnormally high membership price but I would think it would be a lot easier for a site with Grooby's reputation behind it.

Vicki Richter
03-18-2005, 08:59 AM
Seanchi shoosh. My post was retaliatory and witty sarcasm to the other guy, not a slam on your site. Goober. But now I know EXACTLY how many pictures of me you have on your sites. Muhahahahahaha. Actually, you left off Joey Silvera dot com as well I think. Quite a few pix of me on there I am sure.

I just think the guy would have done better to come in here and say "hey all, I started a new site, this is it's focus". People can get behind and respect that and not view it as spamming or being cheesy. Then he could have come back with a 2nd fake ID like a lot of other people in this forum and agreed with himself for added impact. (eg. "Ohhh yeah! I saw that site and it is awesome!!!! My favorite model is myself!")

Me? I just am too lazy to create another ID for promo use. So I will save myself the trouble and just agree with myself with this one.

;)

Vicki

Vicki Richter
03-18-2005, 09:06 AM
By the way, I would post pix in that resolution. God knows I have the bandwidth and server speed to support it. Like Seanchi most of my stuff is shot 5-8MP depending on the shoot, but I shrink the images, not to save money, but to make it easier for my viewers. I have a 22" top of the line Viewsonic CRT (I'm a gamer so I need the higher refresh) that I run at 1600x1200 and photos > 1024 x 768 are still too big I think. It might actually upset the members with 17" or 19" monitors if all the photos on the site were 1600x1200 or greater. It's abnoxious to not be able to see the entire picture one the screen without scrolling.

Still... Do you guys really think that bigger would be better? Interesting idea.

GroobySteven
03-18-2005, 09:40 AM
Ndial - it's something which is going to have to happen, probably sooner rather than later, as more people come along with high spec computers and internet speeds, I think doing a seperate site at this point wouldn't have enough of a membership base to make it worthwhile, even if offered at regular rate (I honestly don't think there are that many members who aren't satisfied with the current sizes) but will certainly include the topic in the new survey I will do on the site.

Vicki, I think you love making little digs at people to amuse yourself - why did you feel the need to mention "Grooby" sites when there are plenty of other sites around. There was just no need to call the company by name, you know I read this forum and will comment back.

seanchai

Felicia Katt
03-18-2005, 09:52 AM
Do you guys really think that bigger would be better? Interesting idea.

ask a silly question LOL but if you mean pics, a more screen friendly size is better

Felicia

Bigguy
03-18-2005, 02:46 PM
I've seen some adult sites that had a (high rez) link under each thumbnail so the person got a choice of size for each image. I even seen some with a choice of three resolutions. I think its a good idea giving the subscriber the choice of resolution they want.

Tianna
03-18-2005, 09:54 PM
I've seen some adult sites that had a (high rez) link under each thumbnail so the person got a choice of size for each image. I even seen some with a choice of three resolutions. I think its a good idea giving the subscriber the choice of resolution they want.


"What planet do most of these people come from", someone asks for quality and everybody starts shouting spam and conspiracy theories. They are a saad bunch.

Your reply makes sense I think. Whats wrong with a choice.

I guess if you're an extremely protective (to the point of being juvenile) businessmen like the guy who made the "ridiculous" assertion that I worked for the website (paranoia is a tragic condition senachi) you don't have to upgrade your site because the ignorant people in question will accept anything.

You can bet senachi or any of the intelligent people in this forum don't hesitate to ask for quality when buying a car, a home, appliances, ect. And surely when they point out that another car dearler or store has a quality product, the sales people and fellow customers don't start yelling they work for the other car dealer or store.

Does anyone really see how silly this seems? Well, at least to intelligent people.

Ciao

Vicki Richter
03-18-2005, 11:54 PM
Ndial - it's something which is going to have to happen, probably sooner rather than later, as more people come along with high spec computers and internet speeds, I think doing a seperate site at this point wouldn't have enough of a membership base to make it worthwhile, even if offered at regular rate (I honestly don't think there are that many members who aren't satisfied with the current sizes) but will certainly include the topic in the new survey I will do on the site.

Vicki, I think you love making little digs at people to amuse yourself - why did you feel the need to mention "Grooby" sites when there are plenty of other sites around. There was just no need to call the company by name, you know I read this forum and will comment back.

seanchai

My humor is beyond many, especially the English. It goes like this:

Guy pitches his site making comments about 3-4 different sites, one of them Grooby related.

Vicki in a very "over the top" obvious sarcastic manner does the same exact thing... I mean come on Steven... I mentioned you guys because I am in no form of competition with you. It was a silly comparison to say that my site has more pictures of me. I mean, of course it has more pictures of me which is obvious to anyone. I mean that would be like me saying I have bigger breasts than you (although this may be up for debate). ;-)

Be defensive if someone says you're resting on your laurels, but don't get defensive if I'm teasing you.

Vicki

GroobySteven
03-19-2005, 10:10 AM
Vicki, I've spent time with you and your humour and believe me, it certainly isn't beyond the grasp of English getting it.
I think the pop-psychology term for you would be "a sniper".
Tianna your reply is just not worth answering.

Ok off on my hollies for a few weeks, will check in if and when the country I"m in allow it :-)
seanchai