PDA

View Full Version : Review Board guys



NadiaUSA
05-30-2007, 11:25 PM
TER and Ser are the worst. They breed A holes. Guys read the opinions on there and get the idea that thats how they should think.

They actually have a rating system stated in the rules that says a girl must bare back to get a high rating. I hope they all get sick!

I want to start a movement to undermind them. Whenever you tour, go to the hotel business center computer and set up a few fake Ids for the board and use them oftem to give false information to make the site useless.

Ecstatic
05-30-2007, 11:31 PM
I understand where you're coming from, Nadia, but not all posters on SER are like that; there are some good guys there (who also post here) who give very sound reviews. (I haven't posted a review in a long time because I've only seen the same three girls--who are "friends who escort"--over the past 2 or 3 years, so there's no point.) I think the best advice on SER is to review the reviewers as well as the providers; cream rises, and you'll soon see who is reputable as a reviewer, imho.

As for TER: I have no use for it. They are full of themselves and their reviews are wholly skewed for GG providers, to the point that they don't even really make sense for TS providers, imho.

BeardedOne
05-30-2007, 11:44 PM
I want to start a movement to undermind them. Whenever you tour, go to the hotel business center computer and set up a few fake Ids for the board and use them oftem to give false information to make the site useless.

While not impossible, you are putting far too much faith in the energy and motivation of the average human being. Besides, from what I've seen, that seems to be happening already, from both ends of the culture.

I joined one of the review sites (I can't, for the life of me, recall which one) and made a quick pass of the gurls that intrigued me enough to join such a site. I found some helpful/useful info and also some that were clearly laid out by some sour-ass git that was tweaked because the gurl wouldn't balance a lava lamp on her nose while blowing him (Or some equally nonsensical do-me benchmark of provider excellence).

Reviews are reviews are reviews. Take them with a grain of salt. In days of old, when Cleveland Amory had his review column in the back of TV Guide, my mother discovered that every show that he hated and tore down with great passion, turned out to be the best that the boob tube had to offer at the time. He never failed. If Amory hated it, it was worth watching.

I gather that the review sites allow you to block reviews (All or nothing, which is a reasonable policy), so you may do so if you feel that you are being unfairly treated there. I know one gurl that has had all of her reviews removed and, from personal experience, I can tell you that any negative ones were purely the "A holes" variety, as I never had any grief with her and found her to be most pleasant, intelligent, and entertaining company.

It's all a matter of personal experience. Can you share a particular review with us that you believe was false/unfairly slanted?

There's two sides to every tale. What's yours?

BeardedOne
05-30-2007, 11:51 PM
Heya, E! :D

I figured you'd weigh in on this, with sound advice as well.

I agree on the idea of "review the reviewers". If the same poster is hurling shite at most/all the gurls, then his opinion is worth less than a pig's life at a state fair barbecue.

I've actually done just that, on many venues, from forums to eBay. I'll follow the links on the member's/reveiwer's ID to see if they are legit or just a soapbox jockey. It's enlightening.


...cream rises...

And shit floats, so use your own judgement. :)

ARMANIXXX
05-30-2007, 11:56 PM
:roll:

BeardedOne
05-31-2007, 12:05 AM
They actually have a rating system stated in the rules that says a girl must bare back to get a high rating.

Eek! :shock:

This part only just registered. Which site is this?

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 12:34 AM
They actually have a rating system stated in the rules that says a girl must bare back to get a high rating.

Eek! :shock:

This part only just registered. Which site is this?

You may not have known the rule but it is obviosly reflected in the attitude of most of the posters.

The do nothing but complain if they dont get the raunciest experience.

God bless the normal nice guys that enjoy their time with a TS for the fascination factor most of all.

moose146
05-31-2007, 12:35 AM
i woudnt complain about someone as gorgeous as Nadia i mean how could you

BeardedOne
05-31-2007, 12:46 AM
God bless the normal nice guys that enjoy their time with a TS for the fascination factor most of all.

Thanky, ma'am. :D

Though, with me, 'normal' is a bit of a stretch. :wink:

Ecstatic
05-31-2007, 01:23 AM
Hey B1!

Like I say, TER is questionable. I know girls who love the site and have asked me to submit reviews for them simply because it gets the most traffic and therefore there's the potential of a high return, and it is a much snazzier site design and feature wise (SER is mired in html ca. 1995, lol), but the review quality on SER is much higher.

Note that they do not delete bad reviews and keep good ones, though at the provider's request they'll take all the reviews down (and leave a "do the math" notie in their place). They are exclusively TS, with relevant review fields, and are not intimidated by any providers, positive or negative.

The two main rules: read a number of reviews by a number of different posters for any girl you want to see for the first time to get a consistency and reality check (e.g., one negative, 15 positive, 3 neutral reviews, or 15 negative, 3 positive, or any other combination), and review the reviewers, to see if they have a particular axe to grind or are even-handed and fair with all their reviews, etc.

Their review guidelines are straight forward:

a) Overall grade (1-10)
b) Attitude (cool, impatient, take the money and run...)
c) Looks & voice (good looking, husky voice...)
d) Measurements (36-24-36...)
e) Cock size in inches. Shape, cut or uncut, etc.
f) Body-build (muscular, fit, thin, fat, big...)
g) Specialties (blowjob, special tricks, bait & switch...)
h) Orientation (top, bottom, versatile, dom, sub)
i) Phone, e-mail, website, ad on paper (which?) etc. - ALWAYS GIVE THIS INFO even if it was posted before!
j) Outcall, Incall options, independent or agency

I don't ever recall SER giving bonus points for bareback encounters. Could this be TER?

Realgirls4me
05-31-2007, 03:05 AM
Nadia,

I emphatically must disagree with your premise that TER breeds a-holes, or the implication that it is a haven for depraved, unsafe sexual acts. A rating system -- ANY RATINGS SYSTEM -- at any forum carries a caveat emptor and mileage-may-vary assumption tethered to it. One size does not fit all, regardless of what her reviewer or for that matter, her ad might say. I don't know TER's rating's policy, but I would venture to say that any rational person with half a brain utilizes their, or any forum's reviews, as just another source to attempt to get a general "reading" or feel for the escort they are interested in. A review is just another tool to help the consumer decide iow. Like BeardedOne said, you take it with a grain of salt. Don't take what they disclose about an escort's practices, or lackthereof, as ascribing or condoning the practice, regardless of how the numbers read. If a woman's overall review score suffers because she doesn't engage in unsafe practices such as unprotected sex, hey, she's closer to closing the sale with yours truly.

You can't cherry-pick or take snapshots of a forum and run with it. As a member to this forum, how would you like it if someone in another forum mentioned that the posters here at HA are of one mindset, or that the place corrupts individuals? What does that imply about you? I started at TER and I can tell you that most longtime posters there that I know are not into unsafe sex practices. Fwiw, some post here at this forum. The TER site would have long been history if that's what they were advocating, and they are not to my knowledge.


.

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 03:18 AM
Great, I look forward to the webmaster retracting the rule. Until then my mind is unchanged.

Realgirls4me
05-31-2007, 03:22 AM
Great, I look forward to the webmaster retracting the rule. Until then my mind is unchanged.

But by doing so, you're asking them to apply a judgement on a particular practice imo. I guess we are seeing things differently, and we're going to have to agree to disagree.

PatrickFromNYC
05-31-2007, 05:56 AM
TER and Ser are the worst. They breed A holes. Guys read the opinions on there and get the idea that thats how they should think.

They actually have a rating system stated in the rules that says a girl must bare back to get a high rating. I hope they all get sick!

I want to start a movement to undermind them. Whenever you tour, go to the hotel business center computer and set up a few fake Ids for the board and use them oftem to give false information to make the site useless.

I actually have seen those review sites and was shocked about how many of the guys bragged about the girls "cumming in their mouths" ????

Fuck, in this day and age??? Idiots who are destined to get themselves and their wifes sick

ARMANIXXX
05-31-2007, 06:26 AM
TER and Ser are the worst. They breed A holes. Guys read the opinions on there and get the idea that thats how they should think.

They actually have a rating system stated in the rules that says a girl must bare back to get a high rating. I hope they all get sick!

I want to start a movement to undermind them. Whenever you tour, go to the hotel business center computer and set up a few fake Ids for the board and use them oftem to give false information to make the site useless.


__________________________________________________ ___



There's no system that I know of that employs a Barebacking experience as part of the criteria for a "high rating" score.

The truth is, the scores of TER serve to do 1 important thing.......they indicate trends and patterns. If said girl is a good provider the scores overall will indicate so.

Conversely, if said provider is an unenthusiastic one, the cumulative scores will show that.

Do you want to know the major pitfall of TER's review system? The worst part are the false reviews. But guess whom the false reviews tend to favor at LEAST 3 to 1? The bad/false/shill reviews usually oblige the provider. In other words said girl writes the false-glorifying reviews or gets a friend to write them for her.

At anyrate, The review sites you seemingly dislike, for whatever reason, do seem to serve a solemn purpose. They conveniently expose the lackluster providers while giving the more inspired girls their just due.

Technology for teh win.......well.....for some.

*shrug*

JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel
05-31-2007, 07:07 AM
TER and Ser are the worst. They breed A holes. Guys read the opinions on there and get the idea that thats how they should think.

They actually have a rating system stated in the rules that says a girl must bare back to get a high rating. I hope they all get sick!

I want to start a movement to undermind them. Whenever you tour, go to the hotel business center computer and set up a few fake Ids for the board and use them oftem to give false information to make the site useless.


__________________________________________________ ___



There's no system that I know of that employs a Barebacking experience as part of the criteria for a "high rating" score.

The truth is, the scores of TER serve to do 1 important thing.......they indicate trends and patterns. If said girl is a good provider the scores overall will indicate so.

Conversely, if said provider is an unenthusiastic one, the cumulative scores will show that.

Do you want to know the major pitfall of TER's review system? The worst part are the false reviews. But guess whom the false reviews tend to favor at LEAST 3 to 1? The bad/false/shill reviews usually oblige the provider. In other words said girl writes the false-glorifying reviews or gets a friend to write them for her.

At anyrate, The review sites you seemingly dislike, for whatever reason, do seem to serve a solemn purpose. They conveniently expose the lackluster providers while giving the more inspired girls their just due.

Technology for teh win.......well.....for some.

*shrug*

Couldn't have said it better myself. Damn good reply.

SER IMO is a decent review site. I've noticed that the mods do allow the girls to reply in a review to something a reviewer posted. I also agree with some earlier repliers to this thread that some of the reviews written on SER are some of the grossest, vile, filthy things I've ever read. The oral sex stories without protection are plentiful and are truly disgusting. I have no clue whether it's the same person reviewing the several girls he met or various people, but the fact that the girls let them do anything bareback frightens the hell outta me..........................

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 07:21 AM
There's no system that I know of that employs a Barebacking experience as part of the criteria for a "high rating" score.

*shrug*

Ter has the rule right in their own rating standards. The webmaster promotes the sickness of us all and laughs all the way to the bank.

JohnnyWalkerBlackLabel
05-31-2007, 07:23 AM
post the link to that exact wording please? this I have to see

ARMANIXXX
05-31-2007, 07:59 AM
escort available: available daytime:
massage available: available nighttime:
s&m available: agency/driver/independent:
incall available: porn star:
outcall available:


sex:
massage:
s & m:
blow job:
cum in mouth:
touch pussy:
lick pussy:
kiss:
anal:
two girl action:
more than one guy at a time:
full no-rush session:
massage quality:
will bring second provider:
multiple pops allowed:
rimming:
other services offered*:




are the photos real?:
are they a fair representation of the provider?:
build:
height:
age:
hair color:
hair type:
hair length:
breast size:
breast cup:
breast implants:
breast appearance:
piercings:
tattoos:
pussy:
ethnicity:
overall looks:
transsexual:




smokes:
delivered as promised?:
on time:
overall attitude:
overall atmosphere:
overall performance:

ARMANIXXX
05-31-2007, 08:02 AM
The only "Scoring", is

"overall looks:"

and

"overall performance:"


The rest of the dropdown info is misc. details.

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 08:17 AM
Here is the link:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/info_policies/reviewFAQ.asp#B


HOW DOES THE REVIEW RATING SYSTEM WORK?
Your reviews should be as honest and objective as possible since a TER staff member will verify them. Even so, actual experiences still vary due to the simple fact that everyone has their own opinion. A lady’s performance may also vary from client to client, or during more than one encounter, so please try to be fair. Please use the rating system below to express your thoughts and experiences with each provider. Tell us how the provider measured up to your expectations. Also, save the 8 and 9 appearance ratings for ultra-special ladies. The 10 rating should be reserved for a provider who just lived up to your most powerful fantasy.

To rate the provider’s appearance and performance, please use the following:

RATING LOOKS
10 She was a one in a million.
9 She was model material.
8 She was really hot.
7 She was attractive.
6 She was nice looking.
5 She was plain looking
4 OK, If you are drunk
3 She was fairly homely.
2 She was simply ugly.
1 I was really scared.


Again, please try to save the 8 and 9 ranks for situations where out of the ordinary services are provided (i.e. Blow Job - without condom, Kissing with tongue, Really Bi, More than one guy). Each of these, beyond-the-call-of-duty talents count for one hard earned point. Of course, the 10 rating should be reserved for an experience that is really worth a million!

Rating Service:

RATING LOOKS
10 It was a one in a million.
9 I forgot it was a service.
8 She went the extra mile.
7 It was really hot
6 It was a nice time.
5 Average
4 She just laid there.
3 It was barely worth the effort.
2 I should have stayed home.
1 A total rip-off.

Ratings above 7 are reserved for providers who render services that are considered to be real perks (i.e. Anal, BBBJ, Kissing with Tongue).

The rest of the review is fairly simple to fill out. If you have any questions, Ask a Review Question and we will respond.

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 08:21 AM
I wish I could, I would need a full advance sponsor for that trip.

nikkitsfun
05-31-2007, 08:22 AM
Do not want to get too off point of original Thread Comment.

Just want to keep it simple:

We have had 47 "Erotic Adventures" in the 10 months since we started letting guys co-star with Nikki to become a part of our site.

35 of those men tried to post a Review for us on TER 5 of them have been posted:

TER either tells the poster that the "Story behind the scenes" is not erotic or using enough XXX language so they refuse to post the Review...or simply ignore the review.

We even offered the owner of TER a free Adventure just so they would quite being so difficult letting our reviews get posted...(never took us up on it)...lol

Getting to the point...Obviously we like having a few reviews on TER as it makes it easier for guys to see we are real (before we actually started the site)...

For people who use these sites to decide to use a girl for fun...just use it as a rough guide coz what you see on sites like these more often than not...falls short of reality.

Michael

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 08:31 AM
TER either tells the poster that the "Story behind the scenes" is not erotic or using enough XXX language so they refuse to post the Review...or simply ignore the review.
Michael

There has got to be a way to not deal with the devil.

Myself and friends I know have delisted from there.

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 08:32 AM
I wish I could, I would need a full advance sponsor for that trip.

I dunno Nadia, I don't think you'd have too many problems...

http://www.hungangels.com/board/files/nadiawhitevynl_156.jpg

Ill have to get a stewardess outfit and fly over.

ARMANIXXX
05-31-2007, 08:39 AM
So Nadia,

What is your issue with TER/SER and their like?

Do you feel the reviewers are bad?

Explain.

NadiaUSA
05-31-2007, 09:06 AM
So Nadia,

What is your issue with TER/SER and their like?

Do you feel the reviewers are bad?

Explain.

Well there is another issue which I always thought is a shame. That is that many shemale newbie guys read these attitudes and think that's the normal view.

I like the guys that enjoy the whole experience and know how to appreciate experiences in life. I love the look in a guys eyes when he is intoxicated to be in the same room as an amazing transsexual. As if whatever happens after that is the icing on the cake.

It seems most of those guys leave an escort pissed off if they didn't leave with a raunchy recreation from what they read in an overstated fictional review that had to be enhanced in order to make it on ter for profit.

ARMANIXXX
06-01-2007, 07:31 AM
I'm gonna give some examples.

brb.

ARMANIXXX
06-01-2007, 07:39 AM
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=54554

TS NAUTICA'S PROFILE

Nov 2006 tomadams 9 - Model Material 10 - One in a lifetime
Sep 2006 Bsktballer 10 - One in a Lifetime 10 - One in a lifetime
Sep 2006 tynerider 9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
Jul 2006 goodguy34476 10 - One in a Lifetime 10 - One in a lifetime
Jul 2006 Rocket21 8 - Really Hot 8 - Went the extra mile
Jun 2006 stellarsoldier 10 - One in a Lifetime 10 - One in a lifetime
Mar 2006 gregbeware 9 - Model Material 10 - One in a lifetime
Feb 2006 mikeinsoindiana 9 - Model Material 10 - One in a lifetime
Nov 2005 latinochulo 9 - Model Material 10 - One in a lifetime
Sep 2005 richmassage 9 - Model Material 10 - One in a lifetime



__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ___




http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=27570

TS CLAUDIA / TS ANA'S PROFILE - RIPOFF!


Mar 2007 bigmac46969 9 - Model Material 4 - She just laid there
Mar 2007 mikepeterson1984 9 - Model Material 4 - She just laid there
Mar 2007 fabdan27 9 - Model Material 3 - Barely worth the effort
Feb 2007 critter516 9 - Model Material 4 - She just laid there
Jan 2007 Tleon69 10 - One in a Lifetime 10 - One in a lifetime
Nov 2006 rebaha 7 - Attractive 2 - I should have stayed home
Oct 2006 marcpullen1 9 - Model Material 3 - Barely worth the effort
May 2006 dtbctrek 9 - Model Material 2 - I should have stayed home
Feb 2006 ssteveowens 8 - Really Hot 2 - I should have stayed home
Feb 2006 usiel 9 - Model Material 2 - I should have stayed home

ARMANIXXX
06-01-2007, 07:42 AM
Awesome girls for the win

ROB (rip off bitch) girls for the lose.

ARMANIXXX
06-01-2007, 11:56 PM
I'm not really much of a trick,

But Nautica,

Based on the reviews there, based on her obvious care and meticulously good service that she provides and gives,

I would pay for some of that.


Claudia/Ana on the other hand, I wouldn't trust her to buy me a Big Mac.


So please don't try and tell me that TER is full of shit, it seems work pretty darn well in more cases than not.



btw...are there any nudes of Nautica anyone? I could have sworn I've seen 1, but I've seen so many of so many girls here, I coulda dreamt it up or something.

NadiaUSA
06-02-2007, 01:01 AM
So please don't try and tell me that TER is full of shit, it seems work pretty darn well in more cases than not.


Your point above is only that you use it to avoid horrible providers and find good ones.

My point is that TER doesnt give a hoot about us. They would have us all get sick and promotes scoring points on high risk.

Plus, as stated by another reviewer in this thread, he screens the reviews for his motives which is promoting A hole attitudes. He told them their reviews wern't dirty enough so they were not incuded in TER's site.

Why do you stick up for a scum bag like that. Just because you find his service convinent?

Every provider should suck it up and Delist from there.

Azanti
06-02-2007, 01:23 AM
I don't see a problem with reviewes as such, as long as one remembers one man's cherries is another man's poison.

Nadia's points on this bareback thing are extremely well made. I know what I am taking about.

SkyTwo
06-02-2007, 03:58 AM
I think SkyTwo is just the sort of sophisticated, witty, yet gracious guy whose presence inspires gratitude in all who come across one of his delightful posts.

Oh, and the word 'review' in 'Review Board Guys' is a verb, right?

ARMANIXXX
06-03-2007, 09:56 AM
So please don't try and tell me that TER is full of shit, it seems work pretty darn well in more cases than not.


Your point above is only that you use it to avoid horrible providers and find good ones.

My point is that TER doesnt give a hoot about us. They would have us all get sick and promotes scoring points on high risk.

Plus, as stated by another reviewer in this thread, he screens the reviews for his motives which is promoting A hole attitudes. He told them their reviews wern't dirty enough so they were not incuded in TER's site.

Why do you stick up for a scum bag like that. Just because you find his service convinent?

Every provider should suck it up and Delist from there.


__________________________________________________ ___________________________

What I'm sayin is, the good providers shine through.

I also don't believe the girls dubbed "excellent" providers are judged/graded as such because they practice unsafely.

They are judged highly because they take excellent care into what they do. They make sure each and every customer/client is satisfied.

That girl NAUTICA for example, she also posts here, although rarely btw, I read that she didn't feel she gave her best in 1 particular session and she ran back after her the guy and gave him his money back.....ON HER OWN :o

TER isn't perfect and you have to weed through plenty of bullshit, but when the smoke clears, TER does more good than harm for both the good providers and the admirers.





btw...here's another girl that's head shoulders above the rest.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=18551