PDA

View Full Version : Bush official quits over escort scandal



LG
04-29-2007, 06:47 PM
So a Bush official hired escorts. Nothing wrong with that. What was wrong was the hypocrisy and holier-than-thou attitude: A man publicly opposing prostitution but privately making more than a little use of prostitutes. He claims that the services rendered did not involve sex. Yeah, right. Pull the other one.

From the International Herald Tribune:


WASHINGTON: Deborah Jeane Palfrey has not been at all shy about it: For more than a decade she ran an escort service that catered to upscale clients in the nation's capital, sending college-educated women to men's homes or hotel rooms.

For about $300, she provided about 90 minutes of what she has described as a discreet "legal high-end erotic fantasy service." But the discreet part is over, after federal authorities charged her with operating a prostitution ring.

"The tentacles of this matter reach far, wide and high into the echelons of power in the United States," Palfrey wrote in a court filing last month, as she prepared to release a list of her clients' telephone numbers and vowed to subpoena her customers - some of whom she described as prominent Washington officials.

It is a defense strategy that had its first casualty Friday.

Randall Tobias, the top foreign aid adviser in the State Department, became the most prominent person on the list to be publicly identified when he resigned after acknowledging to ABC News that he was among Palfrey's clients. The State Department's statement on Tobias's resignation said simply, "He is returning to private life for personal reasons."

ABC News reported that Tobias told the network Thursday that he had called Pamela Martin and Associates - Palfrey's business - for massage services, not for sex.

Tobias, 65, is a former chairman and chief executive of Eli Lilly and of AT&T International. He was chairman of the board of Duke University from 1997 to 2000. He has been a major donor to various Republican campaigns.

Tobias, who was the director of foreign assistance and the administrator of the Agency for International Development, ran agencies that required foreign recipients of AIDS assistance to explicitly condemn prostitution, a policy that drew protests from some nations and relief organizations.

From the Sydney Morning Herald:


RANDALL TOBIAS, the Bush Administration official responsible for foreign assistance who resigned because of his use of an escort service allegedly involved in prostitution, has been ridiculed as a hypocrite because he supported US policies that forced overseas organisations not to help prostitutes.

Others, who called Mr Tobias a strong manager, said he was so integral to US foreign aid that the Bush Administration may retreat from some projects rather than draw attention to the circumstances of his departure.

Mr Tobias, who is 65 and married, told American ABC News on Saturday that he had used the Pamela Martin & Associates escort service "to have gals come over to the condo to give me a massage" and there had been no sex involved.

"I think it is somewhat ironic and hypocritical that he would patronise an escort service while he was denying funding to organisations who want to help prostitutes and supporting a policy that obviously forbids fraternising with prostitutes," said Jodi Jacobson, executive director of the Centre for Health and Gender Equity.

The Bush Administration requires groups receiving US money to "have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking", she said.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Tobias_randall_l.jpg

guyone
04-29-2007, 06:54 PM
Eh, what about the names of democrats on that list that ABC decided not to reveal?

Can you say double standard?

chefmike
04-29-2007, 10:39 PM
More here, LG-

http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?p=244269&highlight=#244269

chefmike
04-29-2007, 10:50 PM
And while we're on the subject of bible-banging hypocrites aboard the rapidly sinking USS Shrubya, how about the 150 "lawyers" hired out of charlatan Jerry Falwell's televangelist jesus camp that masquerades as a university...

http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2007/04/jesus-camp-for-law-students.html

LG
04-29-2007, 11:27 PM
And while we're on the subject of bible-banging hypocrites aboard the rapidly sinking USS Shrubya, how about the 150 "lawyers" hired out of charlatan Jerry Falwell's televangelist jesus camp that masquerades as a university...

http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2007/04/jesus-camp-for-law-students.html

So true. But whenever I think of Falwell, I am reminded of this spoof ad:
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/falwelladL.jpg

guyone
04-30-2007, 04:16 PM
What about all the bolsheviks that go around America masquerading as 'disillusioned democrats'?

chefmike
04-30-2007, 04:30 PM
And while we're on the subject of bible-banging hypocrites aboard the rapidly sinking USS Shrubya, how about the 150 "lawyers" hired out of charlatan Jerry Falwell's televangelist jesus camp that masquerades as a university...

http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2007/04/jesus-camp-for-law-students.html

So true. But whenever I think of Falwell, I am reminded of this spoof ad:
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/falwelladL.jpg

A classic, LG. I used to love it when Larry Flynt ridiculed the so-called Moral Majority.

chefmike
05-01-2007, 09:31 PM
Dear Jerry Falwell
Maddie Lear

This letter was written by three sixth grade students -- two of my friends and myself -- as a sixth-grade history class assignment, while learning about the Buddha and his teachings. The assignment was to send a letter to someone who you think is not obeying the Buddha's teachings of the Four Noble Truths, and the Twelve Step Path.


Dear Jerry Falwell,
We are writing this letter to inform you of our feelings about your actions, and how they conflict with the Buddha's teachings. We are in sixth grade, and as a part of our history class, we are learning about Ancient India and the Buddha. We have chosen to write to you as a project because your teachings about other faiths and lifestyles are hurtful, and against the Buddha.

On your website, as a part of your mission statement, it says that you work towards "healing the wounds of immorality and godlessness in our nation." And, "seek morality in American life and government." The constitution states that religion and government are to be separated. By having one major religion, people of other faiths are not as well respected.

On television with Pat Robertson, you stated, "I really believe that the pagans, the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle. The ACLU, People For The American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say, 'you helped this happen.'" (This quote was said about the tragedy that took place on September 11, 2001). No apology will erase the amount of hate that you have caused and promoted throughout this world.

Also, you once said, "If you're not a born-again Christian, you are a failure as a human being." These remarks are hurtful, and completely disrespectful to the people of this world that are not exactly like you. We are not putting down your religion, simply encouraging you to respect other faiths and people, as well as your own.

The Buddha respected people of all religions. The Four Noble Truths inform us that, "suffering and sorrow are caused by people's greed, hatred, and ignorance." Also, "We can be freed from suffering by overcoming it's cause." We feel that your hatred for people of other religions and lifestyles is unruly, and causing much sorrow and distress to the people of this country and the world.

We hope that our letter has made a difference in the way you will act and treat others. We ask you to treat every person in this world with respect, and peace.

Sincerely,
Three Hopeful Sixth Grade Students

Jerry Falwell is accusing People For The American Way of attempting to secularize this country. Well, I don't understand how that is possible -- Norman Lear, its founder, believes in god more than anyone I've ever met. He accuses the gays and the lesbians "who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle." Not once have I ever heard of a gay or lesbian force people to believe in something, or to become homosexual. And when Mr. Jerry Falwell blames people for 9/11, because they apparently upset god, I don't know how that is possible.

I could never believe in a god who chooses to punish people by killing hundreds of innocent ones. God is supposed to be a kind figure, who is for everyone, who believes in peace. There is no difference between doing something that hurts other people in "the name of god," and doing something that hurts people for no reason. I believe in god, I truly do, but just because I don't have the same faith as someone else, does in no way imply that I try to force my beliefs on them, or that I am a bad person, or that I don't believe in god at all. So, I ask you, even if you may be hurting someone right now, what sounds better: trying to make things right, even though you've caused a lot of pain, or, never attempting to become a peaceful person, being to ashamed, and continuing to hurt someone more? I'd go with the first one if I were you.