Post-Op Pics

[Realgirls4me]

What I love about these girls is that they come through the camera genuinely proud, happy, and content with not only their new "cock house", but their womanhood overall. It's like they are saying, Hey, I'm here. Come on in and try it out ...

I love post-ops. :)

[MrsKellyPierce]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times better

[luv4Tgirls]

some look like it was tied in a knot, not very pretty work

[DeathFox]

There goes my lunch

[peggygee]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times better

These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

I have noticed that some women are in a hurry to show off their
neo-vaginas, as they are proud that they have culminated their
life long dream. It also seems as if there are many photographers
who are open to taking those pictures.

I tend to feel that both the women and the photographers should
wait until the healing process has completed before a photo shoot.

In time I am sure that the post surgical results of these women will
improve, but in my opinion these are not accurate representations.

[Realgirls4me]

some look like it was tied in a knot, not very pretty work

You took the thought right out of my mind. My first(?) transsexual experience was with the stunning post-op Mila from the bay area, and hers looked nothing like those posted in this thread. Egads!

[nicoleneuman24]

some of those jobs look freaky haha

[Realgirls4me]

I just noticed I'm bound to hit the 2000 post plateau within a week or so.

... I hope my gold watch is being prepped and getting prepared for shipment, guys ?!


;)

[such beauties]

it looks like some of those surgeries were done using and aluminum can as a scalpal. no offense to the girls, but those doctors should be lined up and shot!

[Jericho]

their new "cock house",

:lol: :lol: :lol:

[banane18021802]

never had a post op... can they be fucked in pussy?

[peggygee]

:roll:

[TJT]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times better

These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

I have noticed that some women are in a hurry to show off their
neo-vaginas, as they are proud that they have culminated their
life long dream. It also seems as if there are many photographers
who are open to taking those pictures.

I tend to feel that both the women and the photographers should
wait until the healing process has completed before a photo shoot.

Interesting point. I've known normally modest GG's who will show of their new boob jobs to just about anyone who wants to see them?

Plastic surgery seems to make common sense go out the window w/ some folks?

[lisaparadise]

i am hoping in the next 5 years to get srs and i am proud of these girls who show the world there post op pix there doesnt seem to be enough pix of them out there,. to me a not so good looking pussy is always better then a great looking dick

[MrsKellyPierce]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times better

These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

I have noticed that some women are in a hurry to show off their
neo-vaginas, as they are proud that they have culminated their
life long dream. It also seems as if there are many photographers
who are open to taking those pictures.

I tend to feel that both the women and the photographers should
wait until the healing process has completed before a photo shoot.

In time I am sure that the post surgical results of these women will
improve, but in my opinion these are not accurate representations. That could be true Peggy, but working in an office that was transgendered owned and operated and having two post op bosses. We would get girls that came back either a few days later to show us or a few weeks from either Dr. Suporn, Dr. Reed. or Dr Brassard...in my opinion Dr. Reeds looked the most real after he did the vaginoplastey, cause he does do a two step process, but he waits a few weeks for the swelling to go down etc then goes in and does the second step. But none of the girls looked anything like that. Dr. Suporn's is pretty good, Dr Brassards is good but he sometimes gave the sideways effect or the girls would have difficulties.

[TsVanessa69]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times betteri hae to agree Kelly not one of those botch jobs looked like a real vagina, I have 3 post op girlfriends and the difference in their work and this work is night and day, thats horrible

[MrsKellyPierce]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times betteri hae to agree Kelly not one of those botch jobs looked like a real vagina, I have 3 post op girlfriends and the difference in their work and this work is night and day, thats horrible

Well can someone post some pictures??? did you not see the pictures of Kelly Van Der Veer or the video she had me post of her showing it off?

[MrsKellyPierce]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times betteri hae to agree Kelly not one of those botch jobs looked like a real vagina, I have 3 post op girlfriends and the difference in their work and this work is night and day, thats horrible I know these are horrible reprentations.

[MrsKellyPierce]

I want the names of these girls doctors, so I make sure not to go to their doctors. Those are some of the worst surgery pictures I've seen..no offense to the girls.

I've seen post op vaginas done in person and wow they looked NOTHING like that ten hundred times betteri hae to agree Kelly not one of those botch jobs looked like a real vagina, I have 3 post op girlfriends and the difference in their work and this work is night and day, thats horrible

Well can someone post some pictures??? did you not see the pictures of Kelly Van Der Veer or the video she had me post of her showing it off?

No. where is it? http://www.vnotw.nl/overview.asp?Cat=56404&Video=24857&s=

[peggygee]

Following this thread, reading the posts, viewing the pictures, had me
sitting by a sunny window with 400 watts of light and a magnified
mirror up my coochie. From time to time, I do this, much like a breast
self exam.

And rather than bore you with a 'vagina monolouge' from my
gynecologist, or testimonials from former lovers, I will just report that
everything still looks fine.

As I have said in the past, I had a excellent Thai surgeon. In the years
post operatively I have administered Premarin cream internally, both as
an Estrogen supplement and to render the vagina soft, pliable, and aid in
lubrication.

Initially, externally I administered %4 Hydroquinone cream to fade
the scars. I also used Vitamin E, and cocoa butter to minimize scarring.

Over the years the scars have for the most part faded. There are a few
minute scars, for those I allow pubic hair to cover them, and they are
for the most part undetectable.

Bottom line, for any women contemplating SRS, go to a reputable
surgeon, do the appropriate aftercare, and you shoud have a natural
looking, functioning vagina.

[62des]

I'm sorry but those are some of the most fu%ked up post-op pics I've ever seen.

[CORVETTEDUDE]

I too, am not impressed with many of the outcomes these gals must now live with. Isn't there someone(s) that does a better job? I understand it requires both a technician AND an artist.

[Tanuki]

I never want to see that ever again.

[El Nino]

To each there own and I respect individual decisions, but those pictures make my stomach roll over

[johnnyshemalelover]

These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

That's obviously wrong, all of those are completely healed. Surgery scars that haven't healed don't look like that at all. The photos are just of bad surgeries. Maybe those women couldn't afford the best, or they were done years ago before GRS surgery had gotten where it is today.

On the other hand, whenever I see someone post lots of photos of horrible-looking post op vaginas, someone always comes out and says most of them look much better than that--but rarely if ever do they post any photos of "good" looking ones. I wonder why. Maybe the women who have had bad surgeries are more willing to be photographed? :roll:

Realistically, the good ones are probably rare. Cosmetic surgery of a delicate nature is one of the most difficult surgeries to perform, because the surgeon is essentially working blind--things change unpredictably as they heal.

I wish more money was being spent on real medical research, as it should now be possible or nearly possible to grow organs (including sex organs) from one's own cells. For TG folks this would mean a complete set of sex organs--meaning M to F transsexuals could conceive and bear children!

Unfortunately most money in medical research is spend on developing new drugs which keep you alive and relatively comfortable as long as you take them--because that's where the profit is.

[peggygee]

Post 1800





These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

That's obviously wrong, all of those are completely healed. Surgery scars that haven't healed don't look like that at all. The photos are just of bad surgeries. Maybe those women couldn't afford the best, or they were done years ago before GRS surgery had gotten where it is today.

On the other hand, whenever I see someone post lots of photos of horrible-looking post op vaginas, someone always comes out and says most of them look much better than that--but rarely if ever do they post any photos of "good" looking ones. I wonder why. Maybe the women who have had bad surgeries are more willing to be photographed? :roll:

Realistically, the good ones are probably rare. Cosmetic surgery of a delicate nature is one of the most difficult surgeries to perform, because the surgeon is essentially working blind--things change unpredictably as they heal.

I wish more money was being spent on real medical research, as it should now be possible or nearly possible to grow organs (including sex organs) from one's own cells. For TG folks this would mean a complete set of sex organs--meaning M to F transsexuals could conceive and bear children!

Unfortunately most money in medical research is spend on developing new drugs which keep you alive and relatively comfortable as long as you take them--because that's where the profit is.

Johnny, thank you for your concern about the current state of
gender re-assignment surgery.

Before I re-iterate my previous assertion, I will state that in the
first photo, the sutures and black and blue bruising are clearly
visible at the surgical situs.

In the second photo that I have posted, there is also bruising
around the neo-vagina, indicative of recent SRS in the photo.

In the other photos the bruising isn't as visible and the other
vaginas are more aesthetically pleasing.

So once again, thank you for your on-going concern.

And here's my previous statement:

These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

I have noticed that some women are in a hurry to show off their
neo-vaginas, as they are proud that they have culminated their
life long dream. It also seems as if there are many photographers
who are open to taking those pictures.

I tend to feel that both the women and the photographers should
wait until the healing process has completed before a photo shoot.

In time I am sure that the post surgical results of these women will
improve, but in my opinion these are not accurate representations.

[johnnyshemalelover]

Post 1800





These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

That's obviously wrong, all of those are completely healed. Surgery scars that haven't healed don't look like that at all. The photos are just of bad surgeries. Maybe those women couldn't afford the best, or they were done years ago before GRS surgery had gotten where it is today.

On the other hand, whenever I see someone post lots of photos of horrible-looking post op vaginas, someone always comes out and says most of them look much better than that--but rarely if ever do they post any photos of "good" looking ones. I wonder why. Maybe the women who have had bad surgeries are more willing to be photographed? :roll:

Realistically, the good ones are probably rare. Cosmetic surgery of a delicate nature is one of the most difficult surgeries to perform, because the surgeon is essentially working blind--things change unpredictably as they heal.

I wish more money was being spent on real medical research, as it should now be possible or nearly possible to grow organs (including sex organs) from one's own cells. For TG folks this would mean a complete set of sex organs--meaning M to F transsexuals could conceive and bear children!

Unfortunately most money in medical research is spend on developing new drugs which keep you alive and relatively comfortable as long as you take them--because that's where the profit is.


Johnny, thank you for your concern about the current state of
gender re-assignment surgery.

You've been rude to me before and didn't apologize, so from past behavior I suspect you're being sarcastic. If I’m wrong, I apologize.



Before I re-iterate my previous assertion,
I will state that in the
first photo, the sutures and black and blue bruising are clearly
visible at the surgical situs.

No, there are no sutures that I can see, but I do notice some bruising. However this is one of the better ones--the worst ones are clearly all healed.



In the second photo that I have posted, there is also bruising
around the neo-vagina, indicative of recent SRS in the photo.

Nothing is clearly visible in that photo. Is that black stuff sutures or pubic hair? Is the "black and blue" from subdural hematoma or is it skin pigmentation? It's blurry enough to see whatever you want to see, I suppose. If you look at the third picture, which is actually in focus and a close-up, I don't see any bruising, but her hands may be blocking it.


In the other photos the bruising isn't as visible and the other
vaginas are more aesthetically pleasing.

Are you kidding me?? Most of the photos here show clearly deformed vaginas. The only one in this thread I saw that looked halfway decent was the one in Sylvester's post of Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:44 pm, specifically 232.jpg.



So once again, thank you for your on-going concern.

:roll:



These women clearly have not completely healed from their SRS
procedures.

You're ignoring the fully-healed ones which are the vast majority. Look at all the photos I've posted below. They are clear rather than blurry, and show no sign of unhealed surgery whatsoever. Your theory is that these twisted malformations are all unhealed surgeries that somehow form into normal-looking vaginas after they've healed makes no sense.

I'm not saying these photos are typical post-op vaginas, I don't know what a typical post-op vag looks like. All I know is that these ones look bad and they're fully healed. Where are the photos of the typical ones?



I have noticed that some women are in a hurry to show off their
neo-vaginas, as they are proud that they have culminated their
life long dream. It also seems as if there are many photographers
who are open to taking those pictures.

Where are all the photos of the good-looking ones? If these look bad as you say because they aren't healed, why did these women stop posing after they did heal?

Allow me to refocus: All I'm asking is, if these photos aren't typical post-op vaginas, where are the photos of the typical ones?

[johnnyshemalelover]

More

[johnnyshemalelover]

And more--no signs of bruising or redness.

[peggygee]

I'm not saying these photos are typical post-op vaginas,

I don't know what a typical post-op vag looks like.

Well, Mr. Shemalelover, I'm going you tell you what an old
college professor of mine used to tell me.

Please research the matter further, and report your findings to the
rest of the class, in this instance to the rest of the forum.

Basically find the information to support your position, and to refute
mine.

I will even give you a tip. :google

The answers you seek are out there.

:shrug

[johnnyshemalelover]

Hey Johny, I'm with you on this. I just find these pics scattered amongst the TGP's while I'm searching 4 pics for good looking passable trannies. I, like you, have never seen a real post-op pussy. I suppose the problem is that us guys assume on here that all TS's b4 getting SRS were into being photod pre-op. I suppose since most TS's who have no contact with the erotica biz get SRS, the last thing on their mind is getting a photo of it taken for all to see, they just slowly dissolve into society full time as a woman. The other problem is that a post-op TS could just show photo of her pussy which looks good, and we accuse her of posting a fake pic, and ask to show her face, or pics of herself pre-op. These pics are scary, and no doubt a lot of TS's on here have looked at these pics and cringed, but there seems to be a poor lack of communication amongst TS's concerning this matter, and what the final result will look like. Then again, as Im drunk, I could be talking bullshit... :roll:

LOL no, I agree... Since I have never seen any post-op pussies myself, I'll have to take the words of the people who have, and assume that the almost all the post-ops who love to pose for the camera just happen to be ones whose surgeries went badly. As I did mention though, I have seen two photos here that looked passable, so I know it can be done.

[johnnyshemalelover]

[quote=johnnyshemalelover]

I'm not saying these photos are typical post-op vaginas,

I don't know what a typical post-op vag looks like.





Basically find the information to support your position, and to refute
mine.



Allow me to paraphrase our conversation to date:

Me: I'm not saying all post-op vaginas look bad, I just want to know why almost all the photos I see of post-ops are bad ones.

You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good.

Me: I'm not saying they don't, I'm just asking why almost all the photos I see of post-ops are bad ones.

You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good.

Me: Ok, fine. I don't know what typical post-ops look like, and I'm assuming you're right (that they look good) because you obviously know a hell of a lot more about this than I do, since I've never even seen one. All I want to know is why all the photos I see are of bad ones.

You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good. If you still think they don't, then prove it.

Look, I don't doubt what you're telling me. I have no experience here and you have a lot. You clearly have very high intelligence as well, and I mean that sincerely.

Being an intelligent, educated and rational person doesn't mean you never have feelings, of course. The problem with feelings is that when they're strong, they can interfere with perception which of course leads to communication difficulties.

Everyone has at least one thing they're so passionate about they forget reason. I have lots of them myself. I am guessing you're hurt, frustrated, sick and fed up with attacks from guys who get offended by GRS and react by insulting the result; and that's the sore spot which I am inadvertently pressing on here.

You're still lumping me in with all the people who are pissed at post-ops for getting their penises lopped off so they try to say all post-op vaginas look horrible. I've explained it to you several times that this isn't what I'm saying, but I can't get through the storm of emotion that surrounds you on this issue. You simply refuse to hear me. If that's the way you need to handle the issue, ok then.

I no longer expect an answer and I've lost interest in getting one.

I hope I haven't offended you.

[LG]

If I can end this long, tedious misunderstanding once and for all, here is a link from Lynn Conway's site, complete with many pictures of post of vaginas performed by the now retired Eugene Schrang who performed over 900 SRS procedures (and yes, the vaginas in the photos do look pretty good).
http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/SRS.html

http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/SchrangSRS7As.jpg

See also Dr Suporn's site:
http://www.supornclinic.com/
http://www.chet-plasticsurgery.com/Srs_result.html

For a listing of surgeons (for the girls):
http://www.tsroadmap.com/physical/vaginoplasty/

To compare photos of vaginoplasties performed by different surgeons:
http://www.annelawrence.com/srsindex.html

And for some rather upsetting photos and videos of the procedure (not for the squeamish):
http://srs-resources.info/srs%20images%20and%20videos.html

I believe the debate is now over. Thank you.

[peggygee]

[quote=johnnyshemalelover]

I'm not saying these photos are typical post-op vaginas,

I don't know what a typical post-op vag looks like.





Basically find the information to support your position, and to refute
mine.



Allow me to paraphrase our conversation to date:

Me: I'm not saying all post-op vaginas look bad, I just want to know why almost all the photos I see of post-ops are bad ones.

You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good.

Me: I'm not saying they don't, I'm just asking why almost all the photos I see of post-ops are bad ones.

You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good.

Me: Ok, fine. I don't know what typical post-ops look like, and I'm assuming you're right (that they look good) because you obviously know a hell of a lot more about this than I do, since I've never even seen one. All I want to know is why all the photos I see are of bad ones.

You: You're wrong. Post-op vaginas don't look bad, they look good. If you still think they don't, then prove it.

Look, I don't doubt what you're telling me. I have no experience here and you have a lot. You clearly have very high intelligence as well, and I mean that sincerely.

Being an intelligent, educated and rational person doesn't mean you never have feelings, of course. The problem with feelings is that when they're strong, they can interfere with perception which of course leads to communication difficulties.

Everyone has at least one thing they're so passionate about they forget reason. I have lots of them myself. I am guessing you're hurt, frustrated, sick and fed up with attacks from guys who get offended by GRS and react by insulting the result; and that's the sore spot which I am inadvertently pressing on here.

You're still lumping me in with all the people who are pissed at post-ops for getting their penises lopped off so they try to say all post-op vaginas look horrible. I've explained it to you several times that this isn't what I'm saying, but I can't get through the storm of emotion that surrounds you on this issue. You simply refuse to hear me. If that's the way you need to handle the issue, ok then.

I no longer expect an answer and I've lost interest in getting one.

I hope I haven't offended you.

Johnny, thanks for your thoughts.

You are right to a large extent that the constant attack on post ops has
me somewhat defensive.

From your initial posts, I thought that you were yet another one on the
attack.

What hurt even more so, was that I didn't initially perceive you as a
threat. You struck me as a decent, amicable, likable fellow.

And that's even with a name like 'johnny shemalelover', which if you've
read any of my numerous posts on the topic is also a sore spot.

And because you struck me as a decent guy, I let my guard down a bit.
It was while letting my guard down that you began your line of
questioning, and I felt like I had been suckerd by the rope-a-dope.

Admittedly, I didn't think you were sincere about your concern for post
ops, because I am ass-u-med that you were like many of he men
here who are cock-centric and who become very testy when their object
of affection has been taken away from them.

To answer your question, you can go to any of the sites of the many
surgeons who perform SRS, and view their work.

And there are post op websites and forums, some run by women, most
of a non porn nature.

Before I close, I do want to address the lingering question why don't more
post op women show off their vaginas.

There are of course many post op women who remain in the
transcommunity, or the industry for a variety of reasons.

But after yearning and struggling all of your life to be the women that you
knew you were, and now you are legally, aesthetically, and for thw most
part functionally that woman.

Well then...you are on the first train or plane out of trannyville.

And most don't come back.

[peggygee]

Thanks LG for your post, you must have made it just as I was typing
my response.

Those are good links, and should allow those that would like to
peruse the pussy to do so.

There are a few surgeons that are missing, and of course the forums
and websites that I alluded to aren't there.

It has been posited that there are 30,000 - 40,000 post op transwomen in
America, seems like you would have a better chance seeing Bigfoot
than a post op. http://www.hungangels.com/board/viewtopic.php?t=12755&start=0

Maybe that's cause us gyno-Americans, don't particularly want to be found. :wink:

[muhmuh]

...

hm from a quick look at the pics it would seem like the clitoral hood and the labia minora are more or less absent in op results
is that observation of mine correct?

[youcancallmeclaire]

Another flaw that annoys me about srs results is that some surgeons make the labia minora dive directly into the opening of the vaginal canal rather than partially circle the outer rim of it, which I've only seen maybe once on a natal vagina.
And the labia minora are too small or missing completely.
If I get srs, I want something substantial enough to pierce down there. :)
That, and I just like big flappy labia. lol

[Rod la Rod]

more post ops

[Rod la Rod]

and more

[peggygee]

...

hm from a quick look at the pics it would seem like the clitoral hood and the labia minora are more or less absent in op results
is that observation of mine correct?





Another flaw that annoys me about srs results is that some surgeons make the labia minora dive directly into the opening of the vaginal canal rather than partially circle the outer rim of it, which I've only seen maybe once on a natal vagina.
And the labia minora are too small or missing completely.
If I get srs, I want something substantial enough to pierce down there.
That, and I just like big flappy labia. lol



Most surgeons are forming the clitoral hood. Both for aesthetic
reasons and functionality.

As you might imagine the clitoris is extremely sensitive, and the
constant contact on it could be uncomfortable - to some.

And I would agree with both of you some surgeons don't get the labia
minora quite right. Though most of the surgeons who do the two stage
procedure, tend to get it spot on.

I'm pleased with my vlotoral hood, labia minora and majora.

And in he words of Adele Givens, "all my lips are big". :oops:

[Jake 3]

Thanks for posting those Rod.

[youcancallmeclaire]

Can I ask who your surgeon was?

I've also noticed that the 2 stage procedures seem to be more accurate too.

You'd think there'd be some kind of annual world meeting of srs surgeons where they could exchange techniques and ideas, but many of them seem to guard their secrets well and that's unfortunate for us.

[BlackAdder]

wow....looking at this thread is AWESOME for my dieting...

Ive no desire to eat anymore after looking at these posts.


Thanks!

[CORVETTEDUDE]

wow....looking at this thread is AWESOME for my dieting...

Ive no desire to eat anymore after looking at these posts.


Thanks!

With ya', BA...This shit's keepin' me awake at night!!!

[DeathFox]

Most of these pics makes me wanna puke

[youcancallmeclaire]

It kinda sucks to hear things like this from you guys. Not every girl has 50k to fulfill her dreams.

I'm not saying I like any of these results or that I'm even going to get srs until someone perfects it... but I know alot of girls who would rather die with an ugly vagina than live with a perfect penis.

[tgirlzoe]

It kinda sucks to hear things like this from you guys. Not every girl has 50k to fulfill her dreams.

if you're only counting srs, it's less than half that, even for top surgeons. main point is you get one shot at this so go for the good stuff and get a two-stage procedure. suporn seems to do the best one stage (his own interesting method). two stages do seem to look the best so the second one is definitely worth it.

of course, i've never seen a post-op vagina in real life before so i can only go by pictures.


I'm not saying I like any of these results or that I'm even going to get srs until someone perfects it... but I know alot of girls who would rather die with an ugly vagina than live with a perfect penis.

yes, a lot of girls would but they might regret it, i know i would. if i do decide to get surgery, i'm going to get the best i can.

i think i'd rather have the perfect tummy or the perfect legs over the perfect penis... i'm okay with a little imperfection. of course, guys have complimented me on my "feminine penis" and i'm not entirely sure what that means, they say it just means that it fits me ~ small but cute. the first straight guy i was with preferred it smaller and non-threatening because he really had never thought about being with a tgirl, he wasn't into it or anything, he just liked me and i helped him relax about it.

i honestly don't know if i will get srs. i'd like to be happy with what i am and not feel that i'm trying to hide it and radically change my body (hormones are sorta natural...) just to fit in with what other people expect me to look like. on the other hand, some day i do want to settle down and blend in and i think a guy would be more likely to marry a post-op than a pre-op and i wouldn't have to worry about double-checking the locks on the bathroom door so nobody catches me naked accidentally.

tbh, though, i'm not a big fan of vaginas, natural or man-made.