Transplant instead of SRS?

[Vala_TS]

I've always wondered. Why can't they just transplant a pussy/dick to the TG instead of doing all these "inversions" such to the organs? Transplant the male parts to a FTM and the female parts to a MTF?

I know finding donors might be hard but why has it never been mentioned anywhere of the possibility?

Vala,

[Lone Wolf]

Stupid, stupid question

[panama_red]

I don't think many people fancy the prospect of having a dead person's sexual organ sewn on to their body. And even if they did manage to find a living person as a donor... would you really want to have someone else's used sexual organ? Kinda gross.

[Jericho]

I can't wait for the DVD's, "Frankencock" and "My Pussie's Haunted".

Vala, apart from the surgical difficulties, [you can't exactly graft a minge on], i imagine it would cause HUGE psychological problems for the recipient.

[Trogdor]

:lol:

[Legend]

I can't wait for the DVD's, "Frankencock" and "My Pussie's Haunted".

Vala, apart from the surgical difficulties, [you can't exactly graft a minge on], i imagine it would cause HUGE psychological problems for the recipient.

LOL

[wjcdiver]

It is hugely complex surgery. If you want to go all the way you are talking vulva, uterus, ovaries and fallopian tubes. Your start by dissecting away essentially the entire pevic area. Then you have to create a huge space, not just the space needed for the vagina. Lots of blood loss. You have to know all of the blood suppies needed and figure out how to connect organs that do not have any existing blood supplies. (The male anatomy does not have arteries and veins to provide blood supplies for the uterus or ovaries.)

The other big problem is nerve grafts of different nerves. If the nerves don't work not much sex life - or at least not much joy. Its very difficult to reconnect (graft) a nerve that has been cut back with itself and have it work. Try different nerves from different people that serve different organs.

Then of course you have the social issues. Easier to get the ethics committee and donor families to approve something that will clearly save a life - heart, lungs, kidney, liver etc. You also have to get a tissue match so that the organs are not rejected - which makes the donor family issue even bigger.

I am only trying to point out the challenge.

[Vala_TS]

Sorry for asking if it's a stupid question but I've always wondered.

Well, thanks.

Vala,

[Jericho]

Sorry for asking if it's a stupid question but I've always wondered.

Well, thanks.

Vala,

The only stupid question is the unasked one. :wink:

[peggygee]

I don't think many people fancy the prospect of having a dead person's sexual organ sewn on to their body. And even if they did manage to find a living person as a donor... would you really want to have someone else's used sexual organ? Kinda gross.





Its hugely complex surgery. If you want to go all the way you are talking vulva, uterus, ovaries and fallopian tubes. Your start by dissecting away essentially the entire pevic area, have to create a huge space, not just the space needed for the vagina. Lots of blood loss. You have to know all of the blood suppies needed and figure out how to connect organs that do not have any existing blood supplies. (The male anatomy does not have arteries and veins to provide blood supplies for the uterus or ovaries.)

The other big problem is nerve grafts of different nerves. If the nerves don't work not much sex life - or at least not much joy. Its very difficult to graft a nerve that has been cut with itself and have it work. Try different nerves from different people that serve different organs.

Then of course you have the social issues. Easier to get the ethics committee and donor families to approve something that will clearly save a life - heart, lungs, kidney, liver etc.

I am only trying to point out the challenge.



What you are proposing would be very difficult for many of the reasons
stated; finding a donor, getting it past an ethics committee, and the
the logistics of it, not to mention the huge costs of such a surgery.

The most feasible transplant of any of the female reproductive organs,
might be the uterus of a close relative. A female relative would be
needed to donate their uterus after a hysterectomy. Immunosuppresive
drugs would be utilized to prevent rejection, and even then the uterus
would only remain in place for a relatively short time.

This transplantation technique would be used for in vitro fertilization of
post operative tranwomen or non fertile genetic females.

However the procedure for the SRS would remain the same, penile
inversion or via the penile inversion / sigmoid colon techniques.




http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l2/magi43/uterus.jpg

[blackmagic]

is it me or is anyone failing to see that the transplants have only been done on women? not men?

in saying that i mean dont get your hopes up until you see some good proof that it can work in a man* :wink: