Is TransAngels the best TS Porn Site?

[TSPornFan]

1094108

Mindgeek the owner of Brazzers finally created a TS site. I was a member at Brazzers now deleted forum and their staff said they would never film transsexual content. Their former director (not talented) and transphobic Brando insulted members who like trans-women.

TransAngels made its debut last year and has been on a role. A membership included one new hardcore scene a week. Then, earlier this year they added a solo scene on Mondays and a hardcore scene on Saturday. A month ago they raised the bar again. Their weekly updates now include a solo scene on Monday, a hardcore scene on Thursday and Saturdays. Two hardcore scenes a week and a solo scene (I'm not a fan of solo scenes) are the best deal on the market.

No other TS sites provides two hardcore scenes per week. Most sites just have one hardcore scene a week or biweekly. Kink.com USE TO update TS Pussy Hunters and TS Seduction weekly for two TS updates a week, but now they only update one site a week for one TS scene weekly.

TransAngels film the best and most popular models in the industry. Domino Presley, Chanel Santini, Aubrey Kate, Natassia Dreams, Kayleigh Coxx, and Casey Kisses have scenes on the site. I know Domino Presley has an unreleased office themed scene and I am looking forward to it.

You are not going to see a random new model, who just started transitioning. I don't think it is fair to feature new transwomen when they just come out. They have not had enough time to feminize themselves with hormones and surgery. Don't judge Kim's looks after she started transition a day ago. I like the fact TransAngels only shoot models after they have established themselves and not put newcomers in a bad spot.

Their video quality is the best in TS porn. All videos are in 1080 HD. They are colorful and bright. They use a variety of settings and themes. Schoolgirls, nurses, maids, naughty neighbors, and cheating wives are just a few of the themes in the videos. They also filmed the amazing Wonder Woman parody with Chanel Santini as Wonder Woman.

I think their site is hands down the best TS site ever made. No prior TS site has come close in the terms of quality and presentation. My only complaint is the site has been live for a year and there is not a single scene with a black man having sex with a transwomen. It's very disappointing and I hope this is corrected soon.

[Lester316]

Did you get a job in PR for them?

Anyhow; they do seem to have impressive content going by the trailers I've seen but last I checked they didn't offer downloads so doesn't justify the price for me.

[TSPornFan]

Did you get a job in PR for them?

Anyhow; they do seem to have impressive content going by the trailers I've seen but last I checked they didn't offer downloads so doesn't justify the price for me.

They started offering downloads last November. Every scene can be downloaded with a membership.

[timxxx]

Best production values imho, it's great to see the established girls in cool new scenarios. Instead of here's a bed lets fuck, which can work for me if the girl is new. But l don't need to see another Domino Presley (http://join.ts-dominopresley.com/track/NzUxLjIuMzMuMzMuMTMuMC4wLjAuMA) here's a bed....... scene :fuckin:
.

So is it the best ? No, because it can't match lets say Grooby Girls for the amount of girls you get and the amount of new girls.




Btw,l have nothing against Domino Presley (http://join.ts-dominopresley.com/track/NzUxLjIuMzMuMzMuMTMuMC4wLjAuMA)

[Lester316]

They started offering downloads last November. Every scene can be downloaded with a membership.

That's good to know; a big improvement. Never been a fan of paying non-netflix size monthly fees for a streaming only service.

[christianxxx]

i update my site with 2 hardcore scene per week btw

[Cereal Escapist]

I am actually not a fan of TransAngels.

I do not care for "storyline" in my porn so that aspect is lost on me and most of their storylines are silly. "Surprise, I have a dick now suck it" wears thin but they constantly repeat that.

I actually think their production value is more miss than hit in terms of lighting and camera angles.

I like variety instead of seeing more from already productive girls.

Simply put, the site just isn't for me.

[timxxx]

i update my site with 2 hardcore scene per week btw

Best thing about your site is,it's great for new girls.

[TSPornFan]

I am actually not a fan of TransAngels.

I do not care for "storyline" in my porn so that aspect is lost on me and most of their storylines are silly. "Surprise, I have a dick now suck it" wears thin but they constantly repeat that.

I actually think their production value is more miss than hit in terms of lighting and camera angles.

I like variety instead of seeing more from already productive girls.

Simply put, the site just isn't for me.

Did you honestly read any scene's scenario? Only a few of their stories are about "surprise, I am transsexual". Most of their stories flow as if the guy knew she has a cock or the guy is into TS women so there is no negative reaction. Watch this trailer. There is nothing about a surprise in this video. https://www.transangels.com/tour/video/2442506/aubrey-s-suite-fuck/

[TSPornFan]

Best thing about your site is,it's great for new girls.

Yes, sites Pure-TS and Grooby film a lot of new girls. However, no other genre in porn would film low quality models especially in a high quantity. Most new T-girls are not ready to model. Their femininity hasn't had enough time to even blossom. Very few new girls are ready to model. Aubrey Kate and Kylie Maria are rare examples of girls being ready on day one.

[timxxx]

Yes, sites Pure-TS and Grooby film a lot of new girls. However, no other genre in porn would film low quality models especially in a high quantity. Most new T-girls are not ready to model. Their femininity hasn't had enough time to even blossom. Very few new girls are ready to model. Aubrey Kate and Kylie Maria are rare examples of girls being ready on day one.

Not to state the obvious, that's just your opinion, even among GG how we define femininity couldn't be more different.

[Laphroaig]

Yes, sites Pure-TS and Grooby film a lot of new girls. However, no other genre in porn would film low quality models especially in a high quantity. Most new T-girls are not ready to model. Their femininity hasn't had enough time to even blossom. Very few new girls are ready to model. Aubrey Kate and Kylie Maria are rare examples of girls being ready on day one.

Are you even aware of how offensive you're being?...

[TSPornFan]

Not to state the obvious, that's just your opinion, even among GG how we define femininity couldn't be more different.

I am clearly talking about physical appearance. Let's say Joe down the street started transitioning a week ago. He is not going to be feminine just yet. It takes time for hormones to take affect in the body. He will eventually become more feminine as time passes. If he started to transition earlier in life then he could have a better time transitioning.


Are you even aware of how offensive you're being?...

Please realize porn is part of the sex industry. Physical appearance does matter. It is a sensitive topic, but customers buy particular movies for a number of reasons. One of those reasons is the model's attractiveness. We judge pornstars by their physical appearance and performances on camera. Why are there so many pornstars? There are so many pornstars because everyone has different taste. Domino Presley has a lot of fans, but not every guy is into her. There is nothing wrong with that.

Is it truly fair for a TS-woman who started transitioning a day ago to be modeling? The model is put into a bad spot. She isn't feminine at the moment as she just started transitioning.

Look at the most popular T-girls in porn. Domino Presley, Natalie Mars, Aubrey Kate, Chanel Santini, etc. What do they have in common? They are all very feminine. Each one entered the business being feminine.

Most new girls at Pure-TS and Grooby's sites will never appear on TransAngels, Kink, and Devil's Films because they are not quality models. 99% of the models at Grooby's Black sites will never appear on TransAngels. It's sad to say the porn industry has low standards for black females especially in TS porn. Most rare and good looking black women in the sex industry are not in porn.

[Stavros]

Please realize porn is part of the sex industry. Physical appearance does matter. It is a sensitive topic, but customers buy particular movies for a number of reasons. One of those reasons is the model's attractiveness. We judge pornstars by their physical appearance and performances on camera. Why are there so many pornstars? There are so many pornstars because everyone has different taste. Domino Presley has a lot of fans, but not every guy is into her. There is nothing wrong with that.
.

Physical appearance does indeed matter, but not in the way you define it. I can think of at least two individuals who produce content for their own sites which are both popular, and cater to men who want to see 'amateur tv's' rather than professional models like the ones you have named. Judged by your criteria, you would not want to see them on Transangels, but they would probably not want to appear in those films either. They know what their customers want and their customers are satisfied. We now have as much diversity on the web as you can handle, it does't make sense to judge content according to so limited a set of criteria.

[Cereal Escapist]

Are you even aware of how offensive you're being?...

i am starting to understand why in other threads, people have said, "another tspornfan" rant.

@TSpornfan, please consider changing your name to Selfish&JudgmentalFan

[Cereal Escapist]

Did you honestly read any scene's scenario? Only a few of their stories are about "surprise, I am transsexual". Most of their stories flow as if the guy knew she has a cock or the guy is into TS women so there is no negative reaction. Watch this trailer. There is nothing about a surprise in this video. https://www.transangels.com/tour/video/2442506/aubrey-s-suite-fuck/

So you pointed out one video. So be it. Aubrey is my favorite pornstar and that video looks good but I won't join that site just for her because overall, I find the entire site to be of low value to me, especially because of story lines.

I also want to point out how odd it is that you chose only to address one of my criticisms but to that end of story line, I do have a huge boner for Janelle Fennec and as I understand it from a friend who is a member, there is a rather disappointing video of her up now in a library. He told me there is something like 7 min of intro before the action starts and it is lackluster. Why would I pay for that?

Additionally, when i realized that 2 of my favorite girls were going to be in a scene together, Annabelle Lane and Marissa Minx, I was interested but my boy showed me the clip before I could join and it was horribly lit and produced. Why would I pay for that?

I realize that I am pointing out 2 of what could be 100 clips on the site but then I come back to my other point....saturation. Those 100 clips repeat the same models too often.

The beauty of variety is that whether or not EVERY girl appeals to me is irrelevant, just that some do. The girls on Trans Angels are ubiquitous so I don't need more porn from them since it is easily attained elsewhere. There is such a thing as overexposure or saturation for me as when I see the same girl too often, I get bored more quickly with them and move on. See Natalie Mars as an example of a girl I used to be into but now am incredibly bored with.

I don't watch porn for "entertainment." i watch porn to see hot naked women in compromising positions. The more variety of hot women, the better.

[Laphroaig]

I am clearly talking about physical appearance. Let's say Joe down the street started transitioning a week ago. He is not going to be feminine just yet. It takes time for hormones to take affect in the body. He will eventually become more feminine as time passes. If he started to transition earlier in life then he could have a better time transitioning.



Please realize porn is part of the sex industry. Physical appearance does matter. It is a sensitive topic, but customers buy particular movies for a number of reasons. One of those reasons is the model's attractiveness. We judge pornstars by their physical appearance and performances on camera. Why are there so many pornstars? There are so many pornstars because everyone has different taste. Domino Presley has a lot of fans, but not every guy is into her. There is nothing wrong with that.

Is it truly fair for a TS-woman who started transitioning a day ago to be modeling? The model is put into a bad spot. She isn't feminine at the moment as she just started transitioning.

Look at the most popular T-girls in porn. Domino Presley, Natalie Mars, Aubrey Kate, Chanel Santini, etc. What do they have in common? They are all very feminine. Each one entered the business being feminine.

Most new girls at Pure-TS and Grooby's sites will never appear on TransAngels, Kink, and Devil's Films because they are not quality models. 99% of the models at Grooby's Black sites will never appear on TransAngels. It's sad to say the porn industry has low standards for black females especially in TS porn. Most rare and good looking black women in the sex industry are not in porn.

Why do sites like femout exist then if there isn't demand for them?...


Femout.XXX is a showcase of TG models who are early in their transition and ready to show themselves to the world.

[christianxxx]

because TSPornFan is doing what he always does...conflates HIS personal tastes and values for ALL fans of the TS genre. In reality he knows absolutely nothing about who is joining what site, which site is doing well or not, or really anything about the tastes of fans. same old TSpornfan as usual lol

[TSPornFan]

Physical appearance does indeed matter, but not in the way you define it. I can think of at least two individuals who produce content for their own sites which are both popular, and cater to men who want to see 'amateur tv's' rather than professional models like the ones you have named. Judged by your criteria, you would not want to see them on Transangels, but they would probably not want to appear in those films either. They know what their customers want and their customers are satisfied. We now have as much diversity on the web as you can handle, it does't make sense to judge content according to so limited a set of criteria.

Crossdressers are not transsexual women. Crossdressers are men who like to dress in women's clothing. Transsexuals are women and believe they are truly women.

Crossdressers (amateur TV's) are not in discussion. They do not belong on TS sites as they are not transsexuals. If you are into crossdressers, then more power to you. Enjoy your kink.

I would demand a refund from any TS site that features crossdressers since they are not transwomen.


So you pointed out one video. So be it. Aubrey is my favorite pornstar and that video looks good but I won't join that site just for her because overall, I find the entire site to be of low value to me, especially because of story lines.

I also want to point out how odd it is that you chose only to address one of my criticisms but to that end of story line, I do have a huge boner for Janelle Fennec and as I understand it from a friend who is a member, there is a rather disappointing video of her up now in a library. He told me there is something like 7 min of intro before the action starts and it is lackluster. Why would I pay for that?

Additionally, when i realized that 2 of my favorite girls were going to be in a scene together, Annabelle Lane and Marissa Minx, I was interested but my boy showed me the clip before I could join and it was horribly lit and produced. Why would I pay for that?

I realize that I am pointing out 2 of what could be 100 clips on the site but then I come back to my other point....saturation. Those 100 clips repeat the same models too often.

The beauty of variety is that whether or not EVERY girl appeals to me is irrelevant, just that some do. The girls on Trans Angels are ubiquitous so I don't need more porn from them since it is easily attained elsewhere. There is such a thing as overexposure or saturation for me as when I see the same girl too often, I get bored more quickly with them and move on. See Natalie Mars as an example of a girl I used to be into but now am incredibly bored with.

I don't watch porn for "entertainment." i watch porn to see hot naked women in compromising positions. The more variety of hot women, the better.

Please correct me if I am wrong, it sounds like you are more into gonzo porn, and that's fine. TransAngels is not a site for gonzo lovers. Most scenes have short stories and dives into the sex.

I 100% agree with you on Annabelle Lane's and Marissa Minx's scene. It is easily the worst scene on the site. You have two beautiful women, and they do not fuck each other. Instead they use toys. What the fuck? T-Girl on T-Girl should include someone fucking the other T-Girl. Tom Moore dropped the ball big time on this scene.

However, I enjoy the other scenes with the busty T-Girls of course.

I downloaded Janelle Fennec's hardcore scene, but have not watched it yet. I like role play and I must have it in a video to enjoy. I can't get into two people randomly starting having sex. I want build up! That's just my taste, and I am not speaking for anyone only myself.


because TSPornFan is doing what he always does...conflates HIS personal tastes and values for ALL fans of the TS genre. In reality he knows absolutely nothing about who is joining what site, which site is doing well or not, or really anything about the tastes of fans. same old TSpornfan as usual lol

As an affiliate, I know what sales and what keywords (names) drive people to sites. I know there are many guys who love new girls who just started transitioning. I never said your site or any site is struggling. Most of the "new" models on your site are not quality models and very few will be seen outside your site. The crossdressers on your sites will never be in mainstream TS porn. That's only because they are not transsexuals.

[peejaye]

Who, exactly, decides what is the best site? Isn't that a matter of opinion....& taste? I'm a huge fan of Latina T-girls but I'm informed US girls are more popular? :jerkoff

[Cereal Escapist]

Who, exactly, decides what is the best site? Isn't that a matter of opinion....& taste? I'm a huge fan of Latina T-girls but I'm informed US girls are more popular? :jerkoff

this guy
1094714

[Cereal Escapist]

.....
I would demand a refund from any TS site that features crossdressers since they are not transwomen.

....

Please correct me if I am wrong, it sounds like you are more into gonzo porn, and that's fine. TransAngels is not a site for gonzo lovers. Most scenes have short stories and dives into the sex.

...

To your second point...
I am not sure why you would make that leap. Gonzo porn has too few full-body shots of the chick and way way too many close-ups of just cock. I don't need to feel as if the scene needs to be POV, but rather, I do want to see a hot chick 99% of the time. Cock shots or cuts to a dude are as lost on me as storyline.

Now to your first point...
I do find it very strange that you feel the need to project. There exists the possibility the same customer who faps to Aubrey Kate and Janelle Fennec could be turned on by a crossdresser. That may not be you but again, you are just one person and one person does not a market make.

[TSPornFan]

To your second point...
I am not sure why you would make that leap. Gonzo porn has too few full-body shots of the chick and way way too many close-ups of just cock. I don't need to feel as if the scene needs to be POV, but rather, I do want to see a hot chick 99% of the time. Cock shots or cuts to a dude are as lost on me as storyline.

Now to your first point...
I do find it very strange that you feel the need to project. There exists the possibility the same customer who faps to Aubrey Kate and Janelle Fennec could be turned on by a crossdresser. That may not be you but again, you are just one person and one person does not a market make.

I made that leap since you don't like storyline porn. Gonzo porn is the only alternative. Gonzo porn is people just having sex without a storyline. It is not limited to POV or close ups to cocks. The majority of Evil Angel's TS porn is gonzo.

Please reread my statement. I never said someone is unable to jack off to Aubrey Kate and also enjoys crossdressers. Crossdressers do not belong on TS sites as they are not TS women. Crossdessing is basically gay porn with a man in a dress and wig. Anyone one can enjoy both genres. I simply said they do belong in the same category.

[christianxxx]

Please reread my statement. I never said someone is unable to jack off to Aubrey Kate and also enjoys crossdressers. Crossdressers do not belong on TS sites as they are not TS women. Crossdessing is basically gay porn with a man in a dress and wig. Anyone one can enjoy both genres. I simply said they do belong in the same category.

this is categorically false and once again you have no idea what you are talking about. you have a mental picture of someone in their 40s who puts on a wig and a dress. but in reality many of the hottest TS girls started off crossdressing in their teens and early 20s. These girls are about to start transitioning and blossoming into beautiful TS girls.


10947211094722

both of these girls are now on HRT and have begun transitioning as a case in point

[TSPornFan]

this is categorically false and once again you have no idea what you are talking about. you have a mental picture of someone in their 40s who puts on a wig and a dress. but in reality many of the hottest TS girls started off crossdressing in their teens and early 20s. These girls are about to start transitioning and blossoming into beautiful TS girls.


10947211094722

both of these girls are now on HRT and have begun transitioning as a case in point

Crossdressers and transwomen are not one in the same.

You certainly do not speak for me. I am not picturing 40 year old man. A man at any legal age can crossdress. Stop putting words in my mouth and speak the truth.

Yes, some crossdressers develop into transwomen, but that is NOT true for all cases. Some gay guys like to dress up from time to time. That does not mean they feel they were born in the wrong body.

The definition of a crossdresser is a man or woman, who enjoys dressing as the opposite gender. That is not saying they want to become a woman or feel they were born in the wrong body.

The definition of a transsexual is a man or woman, who believes he or she was born as the wrong sex and/or begins to transition to the opposite sex.

[Laphroaig]

Crossdressers and transwomen are not one in the same.

You certainly do not speak for me. I am not picturing 40 year old man. A man at any legal age can crossdress. Stop putting words in my mouth and speak the truth.

Yes, some crossdressers develop into transwomen, but that is NOT true for all cases. Some gay guys like to dress up from time to time. That does not mean they feel they were born in the wrong body.

The definition of a crossdresser is a man or woman, who enjoys dressing as the opposite gender. That is not saying they want to become a woman or feel they were born in the wrong body.

The definition of a transsexual is a man or woman, who believes he or she was born as the wrong sex and/or begins to transition to the opposite sex.

Then stop speaking for everyone else on your little rants and just admit it's all about what you want to see...

[Cereal Escapist]

The definition of a transsexual is a man or woman, who believes he or she was born as the wrong sex and/or begins to transition to the opposite sex.

you are not too bright are you.

The definition I think you are trying to get to is that a Transgender person is a male or female (genetically XX or XY) that feels their gender as genetically and behaviorally developed (i.e. man or woman) is inaccurate who then takes ANY NUMBER OF STEPS from crossdressing through full HRT to gender-affirming or genital reconstructive surgery, such that their physical appearance and hormonal balance is more in keeping with how they feel they should be.

who the fuck are you to tell someone what they are?????

I got news for you, every single transwomen you lust after likely put on a bra and panties before they ever touched HRT or went under the knife.

So what? Is closet crossdressing when you are 14-17 years old is ok so long as when you are legal you define yourself as a transwoman and take another step? that's happy horseshit from someone who knows diddly-dick.

finally, I have been lucky to know quite a few transwomen in my life though obviously not even 5% of those Christian knows, but some, despite a glorious transition phyiscally, are still more masculine than 2 my cis-gender male friends.

its 100% fine not to like crossdressers, traps, early transition girls, etc...whatever you want to call them but the audacity to think you can pigeonhole someone based on your porn tastes is astounding.

your understanding makes you seem either just a closet chaser who knows nothing outside his porn box, imbecilic or infantile. maybe its all three.

@everyone else. I mentioned above that I see why some people point this guy out. Is he just trolling? I really don't want to go back and read old posts to see. If he isn't trolling, then there is no point in engaging someone like this because he is probably too entrenched in thinking that he is right about everything to be able to make such ridiculous generalities. It's like trying to teach a 2 year old calculus when all they want is more pudding.

[TSPornFan]

you are not too bright are you.

The definition I think you are trying to get to is that a Transgender person is a male or female (genetically XX or XY) that feels their gender as genetically and behaviorally developed (i.e. man or woman) is inaccurate who then takes ANY NUMBER OF STEPS from crossdressing through full HRT to gender-affirming or genital reconstructive surgery, such that their physical appearance and hormonal balance is more in keeping with how they feel they should be.

who the fuck are you to tell someone what they are?????

I got news for you, every single transwomen you lust after likely put on a bra and panties before they ever touched HRT or went under the knife.

So what? Is closet crossdressing when you are 14-17 years old is ok so long as when you are legal you define yourself as a transwoman and take another step? that's happy horseshit from someone who knows diddly-dick.

finally, I have been lucky to know quite a few transwomen in my life though obviously not even 5% of those Christian knows, but some, despite a glorious transition phyiscally, are still more masculine than 2 my cis-gender male friends.

its 100% fine not to like crossdressers, traps, early transition girls, etc...whatever you want to call them but the audacity to think you can pigeonhole someone based on your porn tastes is astounding.

your understanding makes you seem either just a closet chaser who knows nothing outside his porn box, imbecilic or infantile. maybe its all three.

@everyone else. I mentioned above that I see why some people point this guy out. Is he just trolling? I really don't want to go back and read old posts to see. If he isn't trolling, then there is no point in engaging someone like this because he is probably too entrenched in thinking that he is right about everything to be able to make such ridiculous generalities. It's like trying to teach a 2 year old calculus when all they want is more pudding.

Gender and sex are not the same. Transsexuals believe they should have been born THE OPPOSITE SEX. Sex is your biological makeup. Gender is the roles given to us from society.

This debate isn't about liking or disliking crossdressers. If you like them, then good for you. Enjoy your kink. However, a crossdresser is NOT a transsexual. Here is Webster for you. Have a good day.

: a person who wears clothes designed for the opposite sex : a cross-dresser
An older term for crossdresser is transvestite. Crossdressers often dress only in certain situations. They do not usually identify as transgender—most identify as straight men.
—Laura Erickson-Schroth
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transvestite

[christianxxx]

thats pretty ironic that tspornfan says don't speak for him and yet he wants to speak for everyone else. i mean thats the actual textbook definition of the word irony.

[Cereal Escapist]

thats pretty ironic that tspornfan says don't speak for him and yet he wants to speak for everyone else. i mean thats the actual textbook definition of the word irony.

1094788

[Stavros]

Maybe the best analogy is with a man obsessed with cars, who doesn't know how to drive.

As with the song:

I am a Passenger
and I ride and I ride
I ride through the city's backside...

[TSPornFan]

thats pretty ironic that tspornfan says don't speak for him and yet he wants to speak for everyone else. i mean thats the actual textbook definition of the word irony.

I have never said I speak for everyone. None of my comments say "everyone agrees or thinks the same way." The only irony is you lying about what I have said. You do not speak for me. You're just upset because I said your site has many low quality models. No other genre in porn has such low standards for new models.

[Laphroaig]

I have never said I speak for everyone. None of my comments say "everyone agrees or thinks the same way." The only irony is you lying about what I have said. You do not speak for me. You're just upset because I said your site has many low quality models. No other genre in porn has such low standards for new models.

You're only interested in what you want and demand that what you like be applied, without any thought to what others may prefer. There's enough content out there to suit you and everyone else. Make the most of it and quit complaining.

[Cereal Escapist]

what's funny is that this guy too the time to write essentially a shill review, several paragraphs long trying to impress upon us why what he likes is superior but then caused the degradation of his own thread by his idiocy.

[TSPornFan]

You're only interested in what you want and demand that what you like be applied, without any thought to what others may prefer. There's enough content out there to suit you and everyone else. Make the most of it and quit complaining.

Not true at all. A Person does not need to say "in my opinion" and "I think" in every sentence. It is a given fact that opinions are not facts. Yes, I said TransAngels is the best TS site, but my opinion is not fact or universal. Saying some models are low quality does not mean everyone feels the same way. Low Quality is clearly an adjective for a subjective opinion.

It is a fact that most models on Grooby and Pure-TS do not appear on other mainstream sites such as Kink and TransAngels. Those models do not have the look that those sites normally go for.

[Fitzcarraldo]

You're saying CDs and girls just beginning transition are not trans, and you're arguing with anyone who thinks otherwise. We know your opinion and what you think. You don't have to keep shouting it every time someone expresses their own opinion.

[Cereal Escapist]

....
It is a fact that most models on Grooby and Pure-TS do not appear on other mainstream sites such as Kink and TransAngels. Those models do not have the look that those sites normally go for.

Irrespective of your judgement of the girls, your very statement is why I don't find TS Seduction and Pussyhunters as well as TransAngels to be worthwhile. It is too much of the same thing over and over again. The same could be said for other sites/producers as well.

What makes Kink or TransAngels a "mainstream" site anyway? It must be the fact that YOU like it because last time i checked the very FUCKING existence of all the different sites fighting to carve up the same audience signifies that you are talking out of your ass. If all the sites used ALL the same models, what would set them apart? Why even exist if you are doing the same as every other porn producer?

If you doubt that variety is the spice of life, then stop eating whatever the hell you shovel into your piehole in your hermit cave and chow down on this:

1095086

[TSPornFan]

You're saying CDs and girls just beginning transition are not trans, and you're arguing with anyone who thinks otherwise. We know your opinion and what you think. You don't have to keep shouting it every time someone expresses their own opinion.

I never said new girls in transition are not transsexuals.


Irrespective of your judgement of the girls, your very statement is why I don't find TS Seduction and Pussyhunters as well as TransAngels to be worthwhile. It is too much of the same thing over and over again. The same could be said for other sites/producers as well.

What makes Kink or TransAngels a "mainstream" site anyway? It must be the fact that YOU like it because last time i checked the very FUCKING existence of all the different sites fighting to carve up the same audience signifies that you are talking out of your ass. If all the sites used ALL the same models, what would set them apart? Why even exist if you are doing the same as every other porn producer?

If you doubt that variety is the spice of life, then stop eating whatever the hell you shovel into your piehole in your hermit cave and chow down on this:

1095086

I am not saying they are mainstream because I like the sites. TransAngels is owned by Brazzers, the most well known mainstream site.

Have you looked or at least noticed advertisements from different porn companies? Every company can film the same girls and stand out from each other. Many straight sites use the same girls. For example, Cory Chase's Productions was one of the first companies to start creating incest type porn. She uses the same girls such as Karma Rx, Ashley Adams, and Vanessa Cage. Her company stands out for taboo porn.

Bangbros stands out for public sex scenes, sex in a van, and gonzo porn, and Bangbros films the same girls from Cory Chase Production's Reality Kings, and Brazzers.

Look at transsexual porn. Kink stands out for domination TS porn with the TS woman on top. Yes, other companies have domination scenes, but they don't advertise as it as their main fetish. TransAngels stands out for only filming role play porn as most TS studios have a mixture of gonzo and role play or gonzo heavy.

If you are really bored from certain studios filming the same type of scene, then I recommend buying a custom video if you can afford it. Only buy a custom video from a trustworthy studio.

[christianxxx]

tspornfan is doing his usual nonsense and he is trying to goad me into saying what I want to say, but I can't. But there is a reason why Grooby has been the most succssful TS site and company for 20 years while the competitors all come in, try, fail, and slowly fall away. tspornfan can say whatever he wants about quality, models, and who he thinks is doing well, but in reality he has absolutely no idea except his own personal tastes of jerking off.

[TSPornFan]

tspornfan is doing his usual nonsense and he is trying to goad me into saying what I want to say, but I can't. But there is a reason why Grooby has been the most succssful TS site and company for 20 years while the competitors all come in, try, fail, and slowly fall away. tspornfan can say whatever he wants about quality, models, and who he thinks is doing well, but in reality he has absolutely no idea except his own personal tastes of jerking off.

Once again you're lying just like when you falsely advertise PureTS as a shemale site when you have gay scenes with crossdressers. I am not insulting transsexuals on his site. He also updates his site with gay scenes with crossdressers.

I never said who is doing well. I only said TranAngels in the best TS site, and that is my opinion. My statement does not say who is making more sales. Anyone can think a product is better than another product, but that their opinion does not reflect the facts about the product's sales.

I also know what sites sale because I am an affiliate. You know damn well affiliates have some information on sales based on their numbers and comparisons.

[Laphroaig]

Once again you're lying just like when you falsely advertise PureTS as a shemale site when you have gay scenes with crossdressers. I am not insulting transsexuals on his site. He also updates his site with gay scenes with crossdressers.

I never said who is doing well. I only said TranAngels in the best TS site, and that is my opinion. My statement does not say who is making more sales. Anyone can think a product is better than another product, but that their opinion does not reflect the facts about the product's sales.

I also know what sites sale because I am an affiliate. You know damn well affiliates have some information on sales based on their numbers and comparisons.

Go back to jerking off, it's clearly the only thing you're good at...

[GroobySteven]

Objectively, I think it's horrible. It's not something I could get into or jerk off to, which is what it's intention is. The content is very nicely shot and very high quality, but appears sterile by the way it's lit and they use the same talent pool of perhaps 12 models, in the same scenes we've seen them in for years.

Different strokes for different folks. If you're looking for super high quality lighting and camera work with 12 or so, of the top TS models in the world then you will probably like TransAngels.com - but if you prefer authenticity with models that haven't appeared in 50+ other scenes and looking for that element of something new, then there are other options.

TSPornfan - while this appeals to you, it's your opinion and others have differing views. Your black or white approach has been noted on this forum many times before. It's not all about you.

[Fitzcarraldo]

I only said TranAngels in the best TS site, and that is my opinion.

Initially you asked if it was the best TS site. Look at your topic title. But then you started laying down the law.

[christianxxx]

welcome to Franklin's world where he asks a question and then go nuts on anyone who doesn't agree with his opinion on that topic. lol

[GroobySteven]

One thIng they TSPornfan has right is that cross dressers are not trans or transgender women. They are men dressing as women either for sexual gratification or comfort - and even early transitioning girls would rarely refer to themselves as a CD even before hormones. To confuse CDs with trans women is more problematic to furthering understanding or trans people than to be inclusive based on sexual preferences of men.

He’s incorrect on thinking that the girls on Transangels came into the industry fully femme. Most didn’t and were at the start of their transition. It’s also been pointed out previously that he displays a certain issue with his own sexuality and then projects on this forum giving the impression of a troll (he’s not, he’s a buying porn fan). I think he has a very difficult grasp understanding others differing points of views.

Who decides what the best site is? The customers do by making the purchases - which is why you can look at longevity of sites and the amount of content they produce that keeps members there, as a successful temperature of the most ‘popular or best site’.

What happened to another site that TSPornfan once thought was the best ? It’s gone (shemale clubs offerings), Trans500 has reduced its new US shoots and I’ll almost guarantee that Transangels will go the same way unless they change their production set up. Right now they have all the money of Mindgeek behind them but when their board doesn’t see the expected returns production will change.

[TSPornFan]

One thIng they TSPornfan has right is that cross dressers are not trans or transgender women. They are men dressing as women either for sexual gratification or comfort - and even early transitioning girls would rarely refer to themselves as a CD even before hormones. To confuse CDs with trans women is more problematic to furthering understanding or trans people than to be inclusive based on sexual preferences of men.

He’s incorrect on thinking that the girls on Transangels came into the industry fully femme. Most didn’t and were at the start of their transition. It’s also been pointed out previously that he displays a certain issue with his own sexuality and then projects on this forum giving the impression of a troll (he’s not, he’s a buying porn fan). I think he has a very difficult grasp understanding others differing points of views.

Who decides what the best site is? The customers do by making the purchases - which is why you can look at longevity of sites and the amount of content they produce that keeps members there, as a successful temperature of the most ‘popular or best site’.

What happened to another site that TSPornfan once thought was the best ? It’s gone (shemale clubs offerings), Trans500 has reduced its new US shoots and I’ll almost guarantee that Transangels will go the same way unless they change their production set up. Right now they have all the money of Mindgeek behind them but when their board doesn’t see the expected returns production will change.


Objectively, I think it's horrible. It's not something I could get into or jerk off to, which is what it's intention is. The content is very nicely shot and very high quality, but appears sterile by the way it's lit and they use the same talent pool of perhaps 12 models, in the same scenes we've seen them in for years.

Different strokes for different folks. If you're looking for super high quality lighting and camera work with 12 or so, of the top TS models in the world then you will probably like TransAngels.com - but if you prefer authenticity with models that haven't appeared in 50+ other scenes and looking for that element of something new, then there are other options.

TSPornfan - while this appeals to you, it's your opinion and others have differing views. Your black or white approach has been noted on this forum many times before. It's not all about you.

Hello Steven! I hope life is treating you well.

It is very unfair to judge me as being not tolerate of other's opinions and dismissing them when people are not reading the first posts on a page. It is very lazy (not calling you lazy) for members to not read the first post and complain when I disagree with their opinion. Read the first post before judging. Here is a quote from the first post. to prove it.


I think their site is hands down the best TS site ever made.

First and foremost, my opinion is not universal. I am not objecting anyone's opinions of disliking TransAngels. As I said before not every porn site is for everyone. I think TransAngels is the best for various reasons. That is just my opinion. My opinion is not law. However, I can disagree with you just like you can disagree with me.

I am not offended or annoyed by your opinion of TransAngels. That's your experience. No one has the right to strip you of it. I disagree with your points. Saying they only filmed 12 models is an over exaggeration. The site is little more than a year old so it is not fair to compare its amount of models to sites much older than it. There are currently 39 models on the site. It will be 40 after they release Khloe Kay's scene.

TransAngels constantly offers what most sites like yours do not always film, that is role play porn. It's why I have stopped joining your site. I really like Aspen Brooks but all her sites at your site are gonzo.

You have me mistaken with someone else. I never said Shemale Club was the best site. I said they provided better quality videos during their run in the business. Also I was never a huge supporter of Trans500. When I was an active member here, I often criticize them for rarely booking American Tgirls. You know I have criticized the trans porn industry as a whole for this issue. The industry has gotten member over the years.

I wished GenderX offered a membership site because their content is really good.

I will say one last thing and it's not directed at you Steven. I find it very ironic that producers complain about people stealing their porn. Yet, they direct personal attacks at customers like me who buy their porn and given honest feedback. They may not always like my feedback, but at least I did not steal my porn.


Initially you asked if it was the best TS site. Look at your topic title. But then you started laying down the law.

I never "laid down the law." I only expressed an opinion. Read the first post before judging.

People like yourself are very hypocritical. You believe you have the right to disagree with me, but you criticize me for disagreeing with you.

[Fitzcarraldo]

People like yourself are very hypocritical. You believe you have the right to disagree with me, but you criticize me for disagreeing with you.

I don't think you know what criticism is. But you're clearly versed in hypocrisy.

People like me?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9a1JQi7G3k

I'll let you continue winning friends and influencing people now.

[WendyWilliams]

aww Good ole Franklin def doesn't change is fiddle.........

TransAngels is a beautiful site but the correct word is STERILE, its so staged and just DONE. Those scenes have been done in Porn for years, though Ill give you not as much in Trans Porn but still DONE. It does seem like the same saturated talent Pool with a few new here and there. Most of that is due to Tom Moore directing it since he is a bitch boy and uses casting as a way to make himself feel superior and important.

Sites that offer variety (of all stages) are able to meet supply and demand to a larger audience. That is why Grooby will always be on top and why Christian continues discovering and recruiting new talent.

As far as Trans500, Josh and Trans500 have a formula that is working for THEM. His quality videos, amazing photos and Miami style shooting isn't like any other. As far as American TS they have always rotated American TS in with the primary Columbian/Mexican/Brazillian content.

So to your question , is it the best site? NOT TO ME but it is a good site!

[christianxxx]

What’s funny is that groovy and I both shoot the same models transangels does. I just shot them before transangels and don’t shoot them 12 times. Seriously if they have 40 models on the site I’ve shot 35 of those.

[TSPornFan]

welcome to Franklin's world where he asks a question and then go nuts on anyone who doesn't agree with his opinion on that topic. lol

Please show me where I went nuts about anyone disagreeing with my opinion on TransAngels? You can't. You're lying as usual.

The only comments that I disagreed with anyone was the difference between crossdressers and transsexual (GroobySteven agreed with my definition.), and people's opinions on what makes a quality model.


What’s funny is that groovy and I both shoot the same models transangels does. I just shot them before transangels and don’t shoot them 12 times. Seriously if they have 40 models on the site I’ve shot 35 of those.

In fairness to TransAngels, they have filmed girls after the girls got implants. Please correct me if I am wrong. I don't see post-boob job Lena Kelly, Korra Del Rio, Casey Kisses on your site. Heck, I don't see Casey Kisses period on your site.

[Steezman96]

Would love for them to explain this

https://twitter.com/NATASSIADREAMSX/status/1042041581958823937?s=19

[TSPornFan]

Would love for them to explain this

https://twitter.com/NATASSIADREAMSX/status/1042041581958823937?s=19

Mindgeek (Brazzers) the company who owns TranAngels has a history of racism. I remember a time they did not hire a black performer (male and female) for over a year. The company has improved representation on its straight sites. Brazzers has more interracial scenes today than it did in its early years.

There is no excuse for TranAngels to go an entire year without hiring a black male talent for a scene.

Natassia Dreams is the only black transsexual on the site and she only has two scenes with them. Megan Snow would be awesome on the site.

[christianxxx]

Franklin - you have been raging against everyone else in this thread including the owner of Grooby. How on earth can you not see that? Steven did NOT agree with your opinion. You need to get your eyes checked.

what does that matter? its still the same model. just because you like fake boobs doesnt mean anyone else or the majority of fans do. once again, thats your personal opinion clouding what you think everyone wants to see.

No I have not shot Casey Kisses which is why i said 35 of the 40 models not 40 of the 40 models, or did you miss that part of what i said.

[Cereal Escapist]

Mindgeek (Brazzers) the company who owns TranAngels has a history of racism.

So you openly support a racist porn producer. that's a good look for you!

[GroobySteven]

So you openly support a racist porn producer. that's a good look for you!


LOL - that's a pretty funny comeback.

I don't think they're racist, they base their shoots based on sales for most of their sites. They're probably the smartest porn company in the world and have technology which I'd love to have access to, in order to find our what sells and what doesn't - down to each and every banner or image. No matter how much people might disagree, in our testing on sites with mixed models (Tgirl.porn, Tgirls.xxx, GroobyVR) on average, the black model (not every black model) sells poorer than other races (with white models selling above any other race). This has nothing to do with looks/attractiveness but what SELLS!

[blackchubby38]

So you openly support a racist porn producer. that's a good look for you!

As a person who used to be a member of Brazzers, I wouldn't call their producers racist. They did try to do an interracial site a few years back. Lets just say the reaction from some of their members was less than positive.

[TSPornFan]

Franklin - you have been raging against everyone else in this thread including the owner of Grooby. How on earth can you not see that? Steven did NOT agree with your opinion. You need to get your eyes checked.

what does that matter? its still the same model. just because you like fake boobs doesnt mean anyone else or the majority of fans do. once again, thats your personal opinion clouding what you think everyone wants to see.

No I have not shot Casey Kisses which is why i said 35 of the 40 models not 40 of the 40 models, or did you miss that part of what i said.

Why is it wrong for me to disagree with anyone's opinions and it is okay for everyone to disagree with me? I am not the one calling people names for disagreeing with me. It's YOU.

Steven DID AGREE with my opinion and definition of crossdressers. Did you not read that?

It does matter if a company films a girl after she gets implants and you do not at all. Some fans like myself will not buy any videos of a transsexual model without big tits. Guys like me will skip your videos every day of the week for a company with updated videos of the same model after she gets implants. I never watched Chanel Santini until she got implants. Anything pre-boob has no interest to me.

Did I say everyone likes big boobs? NO

I know what an opinion is. Did I say it was fact? NO. Learn how to read.


So you openly support a racist porn producer. that's a good look for you!

Funny you skipped the part,

The company has improved representation on its straight sites. Brazzers has more interracial scenes today than it did in its early years.




LOL - that's a pretty funny comeback.

I don't think they're racist, they base their shoots based on sales for most of their sites. They're probably the smartest porn company in the world and have technology which I'd love to have access to, in order to find our what sells and what doesn't - down to each and every banner or image. No matter how much people might disagree, in our testing on sites with mixed models (Tgirl.porn, Tgirls.xxx, GroobyVR) on average, the black model (not every black model) sells poorer than other races (with white models selling above any other race). This has nothing to do with looks/attractiveness but what SELLS!

I think it is unfair to not even test it without trying it first.

I agree it has nothing to do with looks or attractiveness. It's about WHAT SELLS. I will say I think (MY FUCKING OPINION SINCE CHRISTIAN LIKES TO LIE) some people avoid interracial scenes because they don't like rap culture or urban culture in porn. Personally as an African American, I am totally turned off by many interracial scenes because they focus too much on race and stereotypes. I don't need to hear big black dick every two minutes. You rarely hear big white dick, big Asian dick, big German dick, etc. You will hear big dick with those guys, but their race is rarely mention.

[Steezman96]

Mindgeek (Brazzers) the company who owns TranAngels has a history of racism. I remember a time they did not hire a black performer (male and female) for over a year. The company has improved representation on its straight sites. Brazzers has more interracial scenes today than it did in its early years.

There is no excuse for TranAngels to go an entire year without hiring a black male talent for a scene.

Natassia Dreams is the only black transsexual on the site and she only has two scenes with them. Megan Snow would be awesome on the site.

Absolutely. I've been dying to see Megan Snow in more hardcore scenes

[GroobySteven]

Absolutely. I've been dying to see Megan Snow in more hardcore scenes


This one?

[correoelx]

For me, when I watch trans-girls porn is for the girls, don't really care for the guy... So the only requirements for the guy should be that he can take a cock really hard and should love to be with trans girls. And I love to watch girls of any race, height, weight, etc. as long a they enjoy fucking.

[Steezman96]

This one?

Well hello!

[Steezman96]

When can we expect that new Megan Snow scene?

[big_sexy_55]

tspornfan is doing his usual nonsense and he is trying to goad me into saying what I want to say, but I can't. But there is a reason why Grooby has been the most succssful TS site and company for 20 years while the competitors all come in, try, fail, and slowly fall away. tspornfan can say whatever he wants about quality, models, and who he thinks is doing well, but in reality he has absolutely no idea except his own personal tastes of jerking off.

Christian gets a bad rap on this forum, but my man nailed it right here! tspornfan is as judgmental and foolish as he is annoying! He just LOVES to hear himself talk and will go on FOR DAYS as long as there are fools to engage him. LOL! :salad

[dreamon]

Member here. I like them. I don't think I'll renew next year but I have gotten a lot of mileage out of them.

[kenmasters]

Great quality of work, and I'm basing that on watching previews.

[collector171]

LOL - that's a pretty funny comeback.

I don't think they're racist, they base their shoots based on sales for most of their sites. They're probably the smartest porn company in the world and have technology which I'd love to have access to, in order to find our what sells and what doesn't - down to each and every banner or image. No matter how much people might disagree, in our testing on sites with mixed models (Tgirl.porn, Tgirls.xxx, GroobyVR) on average, the black model (not every black model) sells poorer than other races (with white models selling above any other race). This has nothing to do with looks/attractiveness but what SELLS!

I prefer the girls topping the guy which other than a few sites (ts seduction, a few retired or sites no longer updating) is a small minority of content. Does it not sell so its not made that much or not made so it doesn't sell? Was actually thinking about custom videos but the price is high for me.

[scorpeo]

For me, when I watch trans-girls porn is for the girls, don't really care for the guy... So the only requirements for the guy should be that he can take a cock really hard and should love to be with trans girls. And I love to watch girls of any race, height, weight, etc. as long a they enjoy fucking.

I don't care much for the guys either but don't want to see disgusting fat or hairy guys in the scene! It ruins the aesthetic of the scene.

Also don't like TS on TS or TS with a girl. TS + guy is what I usually like to watch.