(D) Rockefeller:Iraq Better With Saddam(WCBS)

[White_Male_Canada]

Now the mask slips from one of the Wilson/Plame cabal and we see the true nature of the radical neo-marxist left:

"...Rockefeller went a step further. He says the world would be better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq — even if it means Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq.

He said he sees that as a better scenario, and a safer scenario, "because it is called the 'war on terror.'"

Does Rockefeller stands by his view, even if it means that Saddam Hussein could still be in power if the United States didn't invade?

"Yes. [Saddam] wasn't going to attack us. He would've been isolated there," Rockefeller said..."http://wcbstv.com/topstories/topstories_story_252203351.html

[White_Male_Canada]

Yeah right :

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - A 56-year-old Kurdish-American woman told of seeing people sickened and dying during an alleged chemical attack carried out by Saddam Hussein's forces, as his genocide trial resumed Monday. The defiant ex-president told his countrymen they should not feel guilty for crushing the Kurdish insurgency in the 1980s.

The prosecution alleges about 180,000 people were killed in the Anfal campaign in 1987-88 to put down a Kurdish insurgency during the later stages of an Iraqi war with Iran. Saddam accused the Kurds of helping Iran in the war.

"My message to the Iraqi people is that they should not suffer from the guilt that they killed Kurds," Saddam said as his trial resumed after a three-week break.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060911/D8K2OAF80.html